<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.mediamatters.org/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
<title>Media Matters for America - Limbaugh Wire</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve the latest research items from Media Matters for America</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.mediamatters.org/MediaMattersForAmerica-LimbaughWire" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
<title>Rush Continues To  Claim "Climategate" Proves Global Warming Is "A Hoax"</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200912010038</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p><strong>By 
Zachary Pleat</strong></p>
<h2>Rush joins Beck in hyping a supposed 
GE/NBC conspiracy concerning WH 
security breach</h2>

<p>Apparently feeling that a cartoon is 
more important than a major presidential speech on the war in Afghanistan, Rush kicked off his show 
today by complaining that President Obama's address on the war would pre-empt 
tonight's showing of <em>A Charlie Brown 
Christmas 
</em>(now <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediabistro.com%2Ftvnewser%2Fpolitics%2Fall_broadcast_nets_to_carry_obama_speech_144408.asp">scheduled 
to air</a> December 8). Not to worry, though, for Rush declared he was just 
concerned about America's children, and then he said Obama's ears are so floppy 
that the children would think they were watching a cartoon anyway. He also 
introduced his newest parody, focusing on the troop levels Obama plans to 
dispatch to Afghanistan. </p>

<p>After declaring that former Vice 
President Dick 
Cheney 
-- who apparently best represents the GOP's core values to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ftheplumline.whorunsgov.com%2Fpolling%2Fonly-125-percent-of-gopers-say-cheney-best-reflects-gops-core-values%2F">0.125 
percent of Republicans</a> 
-- is right about whatever criticism he decides to offer about 
Obama, Rush took issue with a <em>Washington 
Post</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2009%2F11%2F30%2FAR2009113003507.html">article</a> 
about Obama's address from West Point tonight. Rush also claimed that Obama 
doesn't like the military and that "it's a nagging annoyance to him." Naturally, 
Rush claimed that Obama's stance on Afghanistan encouraged the 
Taliban.</p>

<p>Deciding to treat us to the benefit 
of his logic and wisdom, Rush engaged in the kind of gossip that most rational 
people don't consider news, citing the <em>National Enquirer</em> to discuss Tiger 
Woods' car accident. 
Rush then <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200912010024">followed Glenn Beck</a> in 
alleging a conspiracy involving NBC, GE, and the couple who crashed the White House state dinner last week, 
claiming it was all 
being done to provide cover for the Obama administration.</p>
<h2>Rush blames Bill Clinton for letting 
bin Laden go</h2>

<p>Back from a break, Rush continued 
an earlier attack 
on Democratic Rep. Maurice Hinchey for his comments about 
the recently released <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fforeign.senate.gov%2Fimo%2Fmedia%2Fdoc%2FTora_Bora_Report.pdf">Senate 
Foreign Relations Committee report</a> on our failure to capture Osama bin Laden 
at Tora Bora and claimed that the report is nothing but political cover for 
Obama with his base on Afghanistan. However, as <em>The New York Times</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F11%2F29%2Fworld%2Fasia%2F29torabora.html">reported</a>, 
this Senate committee 
report is based in part on a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fas.org%2Firp%2Fagency%2Fdod%2Fsocom%2F2007history.pdf">2007 U.S. Special 
Operations Command report</a>. Rush then used a <em>Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052748703939404574567941741432788.html">editorial</a> to bash Sen. John Kerry's timing on the 
release of the Foreign Relations Committee report. In the middle of all this, 
Rush amazingly declared that he has always believed that bin Laden was killed at 
Tora Bora, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fac2%2Fwp-dyn%2FA62618-2002Apr16%3Flanguage%3Dprinter">apparently 
contradicting</a> the reported beliefs of the U.S. intelligence community. Later 
on, Rush claimed that his proof that bin Laden is dead is the fact that Obama 
hasn't captured him yet, and of course, in right-wing strawman land, Obama can do 
anything. Next, Rush blamed Bill Clinton and Richard Clarke for letting bin 
Laden go.</p>

<p>Apparently on a <em>Wall 
Street 
Journal</em> kick in his first hour, Rush 
then read in full a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052748703499404574558300500152682.html"><em title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703499404574558300500152682.html">Journal</em> op-ed</a> by Fouad Ajami, a senior fellow at 
the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rightwingwatch.org%2Fcontent%2Fhoover-institution">conservative</a> 
Hoover Institution. Rush interrupted his reading of the article a couple of 
times to rant that Obama was raised to hate the United States, something Rush 
seems to state 
just about every week:</p>
<blockquote>

<p> LIMBAUGH: Mr. 
Obama was born and raised on the notion that this country is unjust and immoral, 
that it discriminates, that it is unfair, that it is bigoted, that it is racist, 
that it has stolen the world's resources. It is the cause of poverty around the world. 
He believes all of this. It is easily understood when you see him running around 
the world apologizing for this country. He is essentially thinking he's making 
friends by telling these people that hate us that he understands the hate and 
that their hate's justified. 
</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Rush continues to claim "Climategate" proves global 
warming is "a hoax"</h2>

<p>After briefly complaining that Obama 
has mentioned the cost of our wars several times and actually plugging for the "lefty website" <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fcostofwar.com%2F">CostofWar.com</a>, Rush read in full a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2Fstories%2F1109%2F30007.html"><em title="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/30007.html">Politico</em> op-ed</a> claiming that the White 
House is more or less writing the media's script for coverage of Obama. 
Incidentally, <em>Media Matters</em> has 
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/search/index?qstring=gop+bulletin+board+politico&amp;from=&amp;to=&amp;tags=&amp;tags=&amp;tags=&amp;tags">repeatedly 
pointed out</a> that <em>Politico</em> 
often functions as a GOP bulletin 
board. Rush used this piece to claim that in fact, Obama never agonized over the decision to 
deploy more troops to Afghanistan and did not have real meetings with military, 
security, and diplomatic advisers over the decision.</p>

<p>After another break, Rush took a 
caller who wanted to talk about the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2009%2F12%2F01%2FAR2009120101231.html%3Fhpid%3Dtopnews">deployment 
of more troops to Afghanistan</a>, since he has a son in the Marines who is 
slated to deploy in January. Rush changed the course of the discussion once the 
caller mentioned that he cannot see a difference between the Democratic and 
Republican parties, wanting to "nip this in the bud" and declaring that a third party is not the way 
to go. Later on, Rush pontificated several times that third 
parties go nowhere. Rush then took another caller who talked about Afghanistan, 
specifically seeming to cite the Senate Foreign Relations Committee report about the failure to nab bin 
Laden at Tora Bora. Rush argued with the caller, not seeming to believe that he 
was an independent voter because he was "parroting" Kerry. Rush then reiterated 
for a second time his belief that bin Laden died at Tora Bora. A little bit 
later, Rush felt the need to confront head-on the accusation that bin Laden slipped away 
at Tora Bora, reading a 2004 <em>New York 
Times</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2004%2F10%2F19%2Fopinion%2F19franks.html%3F_r%3D1">op-ed</a> by 
retired Gen. Tommy 
Franks. <em>Media Matters</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200410190010">pointed out</a> at the time 
that several of Frank's claims contradicted news reports on this matter. </p>
<h2>Rush gets scared of talk of a 
conservative third party</h2>

<p>Seemingly 
preoccupied with talk of third parties, Rush 
continued to savage the idea of a conservative third party, arguing that 
conservatism is in ascendency and that they can take the Republican Party back. Rush 
said he's for a third party only if someone like Ralph Nader runs on the left again. Rush 
then appeared to tie the 
tea-party 
movement to the 
GOP, claiming that "there would be no tea parties" if the 
Republican Party were 
the same as the Democratic Party. Trying to emphasize the differences between 
the two, Rush declared that the Republican Party is not trying to harm the 
intelligence community. Former undercover CIA officer Valerie Plame might 
disagree with that. Rush continued his tirade against a conservative third-party movement, stating that it would 
guarantee a Democratic majority in perpetuity.</p>

<p>Rush started off his third hour by 
taking a sexist potshot at the editorial staff of <em>The Washington Post</em> 
for <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2009%2F11%2F30%2FAR2009113003846.html">publishing 
an article on loneliness</a>. He then attacked Obama's upcoming unemployment 
summit, using an <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2Fa_dearth_of_private_sector_exp.html">American 
Thinker blog post</a> to complain about the private-sector experience of Obama's Cabinet 
appointees. Interestingly, the 
Congressional Budget Office just <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fcboblog.cbo.gov%2F%3Fp%3D433">officially estimated</a> that an additional 
600,000 to 1.6 million people were employed in the country thanks to the 
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.</p>

<p>Next, Rush continued to claim that 
Senator Mary Landrieu was bribed with $300 million in needed federal Medicaid assistance, and then continued to claim 
that the stimulus money is a "slush fund" to re-elect Democrats. Rush then made the incredible claim that the stimulus 
money is "a threat to our democracy":</p>
<blockquote>

<p> LIMBAUGH: Looking 
for ways here to illustrate and dramatize the porkulus. Just how much money 800 billion dollars really 
is. And of course, 
we've -- we're told 
we've got a couple hundred billion in TARP money that hasn't been spent. So we've 
got basically a trillion-dollar slush fund for the executive 
branch, Obama to use. 
Now, even the liberals 
in Congress, and even 
some in the state-controlled media were shocked when they learned that Mary 
Landrieu was bribed with $300 million for her yes vote on Obamacare. 
But even that is chump change. The liberals have much, much street money to buy votes now. And 
that, more than anything, threatens our democracy. </p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Rush continues to push Alex 
Jones-esque conspiracy theories</h2>

<p>Back for the final half-hour of his show, Rush 
gleefully <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbc.ca%2Ftechnology%2Fstory%2F2009%2F12%2F01%2Ftech-climate-east-anglia.html">reported</a> 
that Phil Jones, head of the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit 
is stepping down, pending an independent investigation that "he overstated the 
case for man-made climate change." Rush then proudly mentioned that his favorite 
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200910200042">climate-change-is-a-cover-for-global-government 
conspiracy theorist</a>, Lord Monckton, released a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fscienceandpublicpolicy.org%2Foriginals%2Fclimategate.html">report</a> 
on "Climategate." Unsurprisingly, Monckton 
was <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prisonplanet.com%2Flord-monckton-shut-down-the-un-arrest-the-warmist-criminals.html">recently 
pushing his load of garbage</a> on noted 9-11 truther Alex Jones' radio show. 
Rush himself has <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911190030">recently promoted</a> Jones' 
website. </p>

<p>Rush rounded out his show today by 
crowing about an <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.yahoo.com%2Fs%2Fap%2F20091201%2Fap_on_en_ot%2Fus_books_palin">AP 
report</a> that Sarah Palin's book, <em>Going 
Rogue</em>, has 
gone "platinum." Of course, it helps to sell books when major retailers and 
conservative publications are <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911160066">deliberately losing money 
to try to get rid of their stockpiles</a> of a book.</p>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow 
and Kate Conway contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh 
Wire.</em></p>
<h2>Highlights</h2>

<p><strong>Outrageous 
comments</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p> 
LIMBAUGH: You can count me among 
those who think bin Laden is dead, by the way. I have always thought it, just 
like I've always known that global warming is man-made hoax.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Mr. Obama was born and 
raised on the notion that this country is unjust and immoral, that it 
discriminates, that it is unfair, that it is bigoted, that it is racist, that it 
has stolen the world's 
resources. It is the cause of poverty 
around the world. He believes all of this. It is easily understood when you see 
him running around the world apologizing for this country. He is essentially 
thinking he's making friends by telling these people that hate us that he 
understands the hate and that their hate's justified.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p><a name="OLE_LINK2"></a><a name="OLE_LINK1">LIMBAUGH: Now, to Obama and his paid hacks on TV today. Tell me, I want to know: How many people has Barack Obama liberated? 
You say he's such a 
great president, he has such a command of all these foreign policy issues and 
military issues. How many people has Barack Obama liberated from bondage? Reagan 
liberated </a>Eastern 
Europe. Reagan liberated Latin America. 
Bush 43 liberated 50 million Muslims. Obama hasn't liberated anyone, and he won't. Barack Obama 
likes Fidel Castro. 
He likes Hugo 
Chavez. He likes the dictators in the 
Middle East. He bows down to them. He kisses up to them.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Looking for ways here to 
illustrate and dramatize the porkulus. Just how much money 800 billion dollars really 
is. And of course, 
we've -- we're told 
we've got a couple hundred billion in TARP money that hasn't been spent. So we've 
got basically a trillion-dollar slush fund for the executive 
branch, Obama to use. 
Now, even the liberals 
in Congress, and even 
some in the state-controlled media were shocked when they learned that Mary 
Landrieu was bribed with $300 million for her yes vote on Obamacare. 
But even that is chump change. The liberals have much, much street money to buy votes now. And 
that, more than anything, threatens our democracy. </p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>"Socialism" 
watch</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p> 
LIMBAUGH: Anybody who is voting for 
anybody else in the Democrat Party is an -- a liberal. Or a progressive. The 
progressives call themselves that because "liberal" in politics is a dirty word. It's a harmful 
term. They come up with all other 
kinds of labels for themselves to hide who they really are. But who they really 
are in the modern parlance, modern lexicon, is liberal. If they are in the 
Democrat Party and voting for Democrats, if they don't know what they're doing 
or if they do know what 
they're doing doesn't matter. They're causing the problem. They are facilitating 
the problem. They are all leftists. </p>

<p>Some may be further left than the 
liberals you say are not as further 
-- far 
left as the progressives, but they're all voting Obama. They're 
all voting for Harry Reid. They have empowered Nancy Pelosi. They made 
Howard -- Harry 
Reid -- they empowered 
Howard Dean to become chairman of the Democrat Party, and he's out there saying that capitalism's dead, socialism is the order of 
the day, and so 
forth. So, in my attempt to communicate to people who 
think they're independent, who 
are moderate, who are not as ideological as I am, who I wish would 
become as ideological as I am 
-- the whole point of global warming debate is to say these people 
who have been caught engaging in fraud are the same people that are running the 
United States of America, proposing health care.</p>

<p>I don't want to get into 
distinctions here because it doesn't matter. We have an ideological chasm in 
this country, and the 
left, the far left, the kook fringe, whatever -- the combination of the American left is 
the greatest threat that we have right now. And the only way that that threat's 
going to be understood is through a simple, understandable explanation of who 
those people are. So, 
that's why I say: 
progressives -- eh, 
just trying to cover up the fact that they're leftists. They're socialists, 
they're Maoists, they're Marxists. They're all liberals, as far as I'm concerned. They're all 
leftists. 
</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author>Z.P.</author>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200912010038</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:26:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rush Calls Global  Warming A "Scam," Compares Climate Scientists To Tobacco  Companies</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911300026</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p><strong>By Tom 
Allison</strong></p>
<h2>Rush on poll as most influential 
conservative: "This is news?"</h2>

<p>Naturally, Limbaugh couldn't resist 
starting today's show promoting <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fcbs3.com%2Fentertainment%2Frush.limbaugh.conservative.2.1340312.html">recent 
polling</a> that put him as the nation's most influential conservative, although 
he was miffed that he 
earned only 26 percent of the vote.</p>

<p>Rush cited numerous examples of how 
America is being "scammed" by the Obama administration, including alleged state 
dinner crashers Tareq and Michaele Salahi's connections to one of the right's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911290009">lamest bogeymen</a>, Rashid 
Khalidi: </p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Now, this stuff at the White House, these two intruders at the White House. I'm 
not so sure we're not being scammed here by the White House. I -- it turns out that these two people know Rashid 
Khali -- Khahil -- Khalil, who is the anti-- 
pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel adviser to Obama. He -- these two people, this guy was on a 
board -- his name's since been scrubbed -- but his name was -- he was on a board with Rashid Khalili -- I think that's his name. 
And apparently, these 
two people's faces were not unfamiliar to Obama. I'm still collecting data. I got something sent to me 
just before the program starts. I don't have time to digest it right 
now. But when it's the Obama White 
House, remember we're 
not dealing in the universe of reality.</p>

<p>Now, something clearly is going on up there. The 
Secret Service -- there were two checkpoints where these 
people's names were not on the list and yet they were passed on to the next 
checkpoint and ultimately admitted. </p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Rush compares climate scientists to 
tobacco companies</h2>

<p>Back from the break, Rush discussed the "scam" 
of global warming 
and didn't really stop until the end of the show. He read from an American Thinker <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2Fcru_emails_were_leaked_before.html">blog 
post</a> asserting that 
emails from Britain's Climate Research Unit (CRU) weren't hacked, but rather were leaked, which seems to be a common
conservative argument as of late.</p>

<p>Limbaugh claimed that the mainstream science 
community "hijacked the peer review system and threw it all out" and that the 
IPCC has destroyed the scientific process.</p>

<p>Limbaugh read from a Hot Air <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fhotair.com%2Farchives%2F2009%2F11%2F29%2Fweird-science-east-anglia-cru-threw-out-their-raw-data%2F">post</a> 
(that linked to a London<em> Times</em> 
article) that reported on CRU officials "throwing away" raw temperature data. Of 
course, Rush didn't 
exactly emphasize that the scientists still had the data that was "adjusted to 
take account of variables in the way they were collected." </p>

<p><a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911300003">Echoing George Will</a>, 
Rush claimed that CRU scientists said that it was "devastating" that they 
couldn't disprove global cooling. Incidentally, the email in question 
referred not to global cooling, but the difficulty in explaining temporary 
"lack of warming at the moment."</p>

<p>Rush also read from a <em>Guardian</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guardian.co.uk%2Fenvironment%2F2009%2Fnov%2F29%2Fipcc-climate-change-leaked-emails">article</a> 
to criticize IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri for stating that "even if an author 
or two has a particular bias it is completely unlikely that bias will find its 
way into the IPCC report."</p>

<p>Limbaugh really started to stretch 
things when he compared the CRU's handling of data to tobacco companies' hiding of studies that showed smoking causes 
cancer.</p>
<h2>Rush contradicts himself on suppression of evidence of 
global warming in one breath</h2>

<p>In what was 
without a doubt the highlight of a 
very tired and recycled first hour, a caller hilariously called out Rush for 
hypocritically ignoring the Bush administration's suppression of evidence of 
climate change, accusing Limbaugh of "simply lying" about the scientific 
consensus. Rush dived 
head first into an all-out attack on the caller, calling him a 
"menace" and claiming that while 
there is no data supporting global warming for the Bush 
administration to have suppressed, the Bush administration was doing us a favor 
by suppressing data that supported global warming: 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Now, wait. You're missing the point here. You're just 
being totally guided by your ideology, by your liberalism, by your partisanship. 
There is no man-made global warming. Do you understand that? There was nothing 
to suppress. Anybody that suppressed data that said there was man-made global 
warming was doing us a favor. They knew it was a hoax, and they were not spreading lies. 
</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Returning to smearing advocates of 
climate change legislation, Rush mocked a U.K. climate scientist who <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fscotlandonsunday.scotsman.com%2Flatestnews%2FWarming-will-39wipe-out-billions39.5867379.jp">predicted</a> 
widespread devastation if climate change isn't addressed and was unmoved by a 
BBC <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.bbc.co.uk%2F2%2Fhi%2Fscience%2Fnature%2F8375949.stm">article</a> that 
reported that "[c]limate 'is a major cause' of conflict in 
Africa." Rush then <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911300015">accused</a> the climate change 
community of employing "terror tactics" and of being a "cabal of thugs" who are 
"shaking down" oil companies.</p>
<h2>Rush calls Paul Krugman a "genuine 
idiot"</h2>

<p>Before playing 
Paul Krugman's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911290003">comments</a> on ABC's <em>This Week</em> in which the Nobel Prize-winning economist defended climate change 
theory, Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911300020">called him</a> a 
"genuine idiot." Wrapping up the hour, Rush bizarrely claimed that "there aren't any" green jobs and 
that photographs of polar bears stranded on ice floes are doctored. Oh, and Rush informed his 
listeners that polar bears love swimming, anyway.</p>

<p>Tying up a few loose ends in a very 
climate-heavy segment, 
Rush again <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911180043">ignored</a> prominent 
conservatives' support and criticized the Obama's administration's decision to 
hold civilian trials for terror suspects.</p>

<p>Limbaugh claimed that Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) "suggests that people who don't believe in 
civilian trials for terrorists should just leave America and go someplace else." 
Conrad <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnsnews.com%2Fnews%2Farticle%2F57508">actually said</a> 
that trying terror suspects in civilian courts has been done "very successfully" and that "if 
people don't believe in our <em>system</em>, they ought to go somewhere 
else."</p>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow 
and Kate Conway contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh 
Wire.</em></p>
<h2>Highlights</h2>
<blockquote>

<p> LIMBAUGH: 
Now, this stuff at the 
White House, these two intruders at the 
White House. I'm not so sure we're not being scammed here by the White House. 
I -- it turns out that these two 
people know Rashid Khali -- 
Khahil -- 
Khalil, who is the anti-- pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel adviser to Obama. He -- these two people, this 
guy was on a board -- 
his name's since been 
scrubbed -- but his name was -- he was on a board with 
Rashid Khalili -- I 
think that's his name. And apparently, these two people's faces were not unfamiliar 
to Obama. I'm still 
collecting data. I got 
something sent to me just before the program starts. I don't have time to digest it right 
now. But when it's the Obama White 
House, remember we're 
not dealing in the universe of reality.</p>

<p>Now, something clearly is going on up there. The 
Secret Service -- there were two checkpoints where these 
people's names were not on the list and yet they were passed on to the next 
checkpoint and ultimately admitted.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Senator Kent Conrad 
suggests that people who don't believe in civilian trials for terrorists should 
just leave America and go someplace else. This, from last Wednesday. Senator Kent Conrad told 
Cybercast News Service that civilian courts are well-suited to prosecute Al Qaeda terrorists, and if 
people don't believe in our system, maybe they ought to go somewhere else. So 
here you have a political hack -- 
and by the way a friend of Angelo at Countrywide -- who has never done 
anything in his life except hold public office, thinks we should all leave America if we 
don't understand how important it is to try Khalid Shaikh Mohammed in a civilian court in New York 
City. He obviously knows so much more about both radical Islam and American 
history than any of us. Doofus Democrat.</p>

<p>Rush wrapped up the show with 
another nod to his purported greatness, complete with a wink to the ditto cam. 
</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Outrageous 
comments</h2>
<blockquote>

<p> CALLER: Hi. I 
have to say I'm kind of surprised at your outrage over the suppression of scientific data when it was 
something that the Bush administration was so dedicated to. There's 
dozens of examples of them suppressing and censoring any data that would support 
global warming. I didn't -- 
don't recall you making a peep about that.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Because there isn't any 
data that supports global warming. That's the whole point.</p>

<p>CALLER: Then why would they choose 
to censor so much of it from government reports?</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: They didn't censor 
anything; they refused to go along with the hoax. They were censoring data that 
did not prove what the global warming people wanted it to prove. And that's what 
the Oba --</p>

<p>CALLER: Well, you're just wrong. You're just -- you're simply lying about 
that. There's --</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: No. I'm not --</p>

<p>CALLER: -- loads of evidence of them removing language 
from government reports that support, you know, scientific theories about global 
warming.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: There is -- now, wait --</p>

<p>CALLER: They did it dozens of 
times.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Now, wait. You're missing the point here. You're just 
being totally guided by your ideology, by your liberalism, by your partisanship. 
There is no man-made global warming. Do you understand that? There was nothing 
to suppress. Anybody that suppressed data that said there was man-made global 
warming was doing us a favor. They knew it was a hoax, and they were not spreading 
lies.</p>

<p>It's that there is no man-made 
global warming. There is no need for Obama national health care reform. There is 
no need for tax, 
crap, and spend. There 
is no need for further stimulus. There is no need for Obama. There is no need 
for liberalism. There is no need for you. You are a menace.</p>

<p>You pose a threat to freedom and 
liberty of your fellow citizens because you are too blind to understand what the 
people you respect are doing. And you're going to be the first they come for. 
Because you're the easiest to get, because you're the most gullible and the 
most uninformed. People like you, John, will give up your freedom if it means 
putting Bush in jail.</p>

<p>God save our country from people 
like you. There is no 
-- how can you call here today and say global warming data was 
suppressed by the Bush administration? Snerdley ought to get a raise for finding 
you. Good God. We just got a call from the universe of lies. 
</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>America's Truth 
Rejecter</h2>
<blockquote>

<p> LIMBAUGH: 
Remember, in these emails, they 
-- one of them 
-- somebody wrote to somebody, "It's devastating, it is devastating that we 
can't explain the earth cooling." Meaning, it's -- they don't have a reason that they could give for the earth 
cooling that would also 
support the whole global warming thesis. </p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author>T.A.</author>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911300026</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:27:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rush claims  liberals are "never held to account for the inhumanity they propose and  promote"</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911250037</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p><strong>By Greg Lewis</strong></p>

<p>"Welcome to the universe of 
reality," Rush greeted us as he started off his program today, clearly 
indicating that he wasn't about to give us a break on the "climate change is a hoax" nonsense 
before the holiday. </p>

<p>But first Rush read a nonsensical <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fcorner.nationalreview.com%2Fpost%2F%3Fq%3DNzY2ZTNjZDcyNjY3MjdkY2JkYjAyYjVmYWM3NDc4N2Y">post</a> 
from The Corner 
claiming that "they are not happy in India" over the way Obama introduced 
their nation's prime 
minister at last 
night's state dinner. What was National Review's Kevin Williamson's evidence 
that Indians were upset about Obama's comments? Well, there was 
none.</p>

<p>Then Rush trumpeted the news that 
Obama would be attending the climate change conference in Copenhagen next month. 
Rush declared this good news, since every event Obama attends is an abysmal failure. 
Rush wondered who Obama would bow down to over there.</p>

<p>Finally, Rush got back to 
yesterday's big topic: 
that the reportedly 
hacked CRU emails show that man-made global warming is hoax. <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911230052">Never mind that they 
don't</a>, but that didn't stop Rush from making that notion into the topic of 
the day for the second day in a row. Rush warned the climate scientists in the 
middle of this controversy that it won't blow over, even though some in the 
state-controlled media are trying to circle the wagons for 
them.</p>

<p>Rush added that doctors have been 
demonized by Democrats, 
while scientists are the "essence of purity." Rush then called CRU scientists 
Michael Mann and Phil Jones frauds, and NASA climate scientist James Hansen an "insane" fraud. 
</p>

<p>Rush went on to complain about 
<em>Newsweek</em>'s "<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsweek.com%2Fid%2F224178">puff piece</a>" on 
Hansen, and then 
claimed that the fraudulent "Yamal study" meant that climate change was all 
based on fiction. (Rush's claim about the Yamal study has been <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.realclimate.org%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F2009%2F09%2Fhey-ya-mal%2F">completely 
debunked</a>.)</p>

<p>Then Rush launched into a rant 
claiming that liberalism "kills," basing this assertion on the banning of DDT "for the sake 
of our environment." Rush cried that this move resulted in millions of deaths 
because of malaria, and therefore, liberals have blood on their hands: 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: [Liberals] are never held 
to account for the inhumanity they propose and promote. No one ever studies the 
human suffering and toll that results from the left's policies, and thus they can continue 
to make claims and create images of salvation without ever having to answer for 
the untold damage they've already committed. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush and conservatives can cry as 
much as they want, but it won't make DDT into a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scientificamerican.com%2Farticle.cfm%3Fid%3Dddt-use-to-combat-malaria">malaria-solving</a> 
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2005%2F06%2F04%2FAR2005060400130_2.html">silver 
bullet</a>. </p>
<h2>Rush falsely portrays himself as 
inhabitant of the "universe of reality"</h2>

<p>After the break, Rush reminisced 
about his <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911230018">comments</a> earlier this week 
that Sen. Mary Landrieu "may be the most expensive prostitute in the history of 
prostitution" and played audio clips from MSNBC's Dylan Ratigan discussing them. 
Rush countered MSNBC's apparent disapproval with a clip from last night's 
<em>Leno</em>, who apparently "side[d]" 
with Rush.</p>

<p>Following another break, Rush joined 
numerous conservative bloggers in decrying the case of four Navy SEALS being 
charged with "roughing 
up" a detainee. Rush blamed political correctness for "literally" destroying 
the country. Rush 
claimed that "everyone" is outraged about this (HotAir's Allahpundit <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fhotair.com%2Farchives%2F2009%2F11%2F24%2Fthree-navy-seals-court-martialed-after-giving-most-wanted-iraqi-terrorist-a-fat-lip%2F">sounds 
skeptical</a>, though). Rush also asserted that this stems from Abu Ghraib and 
the "supposed torture" at Guant&aacute;namo Bay. He warned that by doing this, we're 
telegraphing our "utter weakness and vulnerability." </p>

<p>Next up, Rush looked at a recent 
<em>Washington Post</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2009%2F11%2F24%2FAR2009112402989.html">poll</a> 
finding that while fewer people believe global warming is happening, they still 
support carbon caps. Rush -- citing absolutely no evidence to support his claim 
-- called it a "rigged poll." </p>

<p>This got Rush started on another 
rant about the global warming "hoax" and how the CRU email scandal is the 
equivalent of the global warming "bubble" bursting. Rush said that Obama is a 
"crook speculator" perpetrating the global warming bubble and went on to discuss 
how the scandal might impact the "entire field of science," claiming that 
science has now been "corrupted." He also accused Obama of living in the 
"universe of lies and deceit," while bragging that he himself lives in the 
"universe of reality." </p>

<p>Rush closed out the first hour with 
a few audio clips from an appearance by actor Ed Begley Jr. on Fox News' 
<em>Your World with Neil Cavuto</em> 
yesterday afternoon. He mocked Begley as an "idiot" for his defense of climate 
change.</p>
<h2>Rush: "Hopefully" Obama will be 
detained during his press conference next week at West 
Point</h2>

<p>The second hour of today's show 
began with this comment from Rush: 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: You see where President 
Obama, in announcing how he intends to lose the war in Iraq 
-- sorry, Afghanistan -- or both, actually -- is going to do it, the national address 
will occur from West Point on December 1st. My question is, will 
they detain him? Hopefully. 
</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Then Limbaugh was back to railing 
about the CRU emails and the "hoax" of global warming, again bragging that he 
resides in the "universe of reality." Then the black helicopters swooped 
in: 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: This is about advancing 
socialism, liberalism, Marxism, whatever you want to call it. It's about 
advancing an agenda that takes people -- freedom away from people, their 
individuality. It destroys capitalism, and 
seeks to establish everybody under the auspices of a giant world government 
somewhere in the United Nations. That's what this is about. And it has been 
exposed. 
</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush went on to relive his 1992 
appearance on <em>Nightline</em>, opposite 
Al Gore, in which they discussed climate change and environmental policies. 
There is something surreal about listening to Rush picking up his argument with 
Gore from 17 years ago. It also makes us wonder: When is the last time you've seen a Rush 
Limbaugh media appearance that has positioned Limbaugh opposite somebody 
he disagrees with? </p>

<p>Rush spent the remainder of the hour 
with a couple of callers with military backgrounds. The first caller was a 
self-described Navy intelligence officer who expressed concern about the Navy 
SEALs case Rush had 
discussed earlier. Rush agreed with the points the caller made.</p>

<p>The other caller was a military 
veteran who also had 
worked for Blackwater in Iraq. The caller described the situation with the 
SEALs as payback for 
the way the Somali pirate ordeal a few months back was handled. This led to a 
broader discussion with the caller about the "feminization" of the military and 
political correctness. </p>
<h2>Rush defends his accusation that the 
U.S. military 
is a victim of 
"chickification"</h2>

<p>The third hour began with Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911250010">echoing</a> Michelle Malkin in 
demanding an apology from the media for falling for the reportedly faked suicide of the Kentucky census worker. 
Rush said this was just like the Duke lacrosse case in the way it was portrayed 
by the media. </p>

<p>Then Rush read an email from a 
listener who criticized him for saying the military has been the victim of 
"chickification." Rush said that he understood the listener's sentiment, but 
argued that she didn't understand what he meant by "chickification," so he 
explained it: 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: "Chickification" means precisely men stop being men. They've 
been neutered, and they 
just -- it results from 
a number of things. Nagging. In this case -- not nagging, but in this case it results 
from -- clearly these 
guys saw the way to the top is PC after Tailhook. That's the way to the top, PC. 
PC is destroying this country. It's destroying institutions left and 
right. 
</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Next, Rush decided to politicize 
college football. Discussing the "border war" <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FBorder_War_%2528Kansas%25E2%2580%2593Missouri_rivalry%2529%23Football">rivalry</a> 
between the Missouri Tigers and Kansas Jayhawks, Rush called on his listeners in 
Kansas to support Mizzou in their matchup this 
weekend because University of Missouri system president Gary Forsee <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.columbiatribune.com%2Fnews%2F2009%2Fnov%2F24%2Fcap-and-trade-bad-for-mu-forsee-says%2F">opposes</a> 
cap-and-trade legislation. Rush 
called Forsee's stance a "gutsy" and "courageous" move.</p>

<p>Before the commercial break, Rush 
quickly noted that Obama's grandmother's trip to Mecca is <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.adnkronos.com%2FAKI%2FEnglish%2FReligion%2F%3Fid%3D3.0.4036802442">reportedly</a> 
being paid for by the Saudi royal family. Rush said it looks like Obama's bow to 
the Saudi king has "paid off."</p>

<p>Following the break, Rush took a few 
more callers who spoke effusively about the host. One wanted to know if 
Republicans who support climate change legislation would admit that they've been 
duped in light of the CRU emails. Rush said that question could be asked of 
several Republicans on a number of issues, but there is still a fear that 
criticizing Obama will result in being called a racist. </p>
<h2>Rush partakes in his annual 
Thanksgiving revisionist history</h2>

<p>Rush spent the remainder of his show 
reading from a chapter in one of his books about the "<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rushlimbaugh.com%2Fhome%2Fdaily%2Fsite_112107%2Fcontent%2F01125113.member.html">real</a>" 
story of Thanksgiving. Save yourself some time: It's all an argument that the first 
Thanksgiving was a rejection of socialism. Here's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sail1620.org%2Fhistory%2Farticles%2F93-roast-bull-cranberry-sauce.html">one 
alternate take</a> on Limbaugh's attempt at revisionist history. 
</p>

<p><em>Zachary Pleat 
and Kate Conway contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh 
Wire.</em></p>
<h2>Highlights</h2>

<p><strong>Outrageous 
comments</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p> 
LIMBAUGH: One thing that I want to 
pound home here today: Liberalism, Marxism, socialism, whatever it 
is, kills. DDT banned for the sake of our environment, for the sake of birds, 
DDT was weakening the shells of little baby bird eggs, they said, and this was 
causing malformed and depletions in bird populations. So we had to get rid of 
DDT thanks to an insaniac by the name of Rachel Carson, may she rest in peace. 
May peace be upon her, whatever.</p>

<p>And as a result, malaria is killing 
millions all over Africa and the world simply 
because we decided erroneously to protect something that wasn't being damaged. 
The Third World, the Third World is strewn 
with dead babies thanks to the banning of DDT. It was advocated by the 
environmental movement in this country. </p>

<p>They should take credit for all the 
dead who might have otherwise lived. Marxism, socialism, liberalism kills, no matter how they dress it 
up. Fifty million deaths since DDT was banned. Today, it's global warming. 
Climate change. They could care less about the science. They could care less 
about the facts. It's about communism, statism, destroying the individual, 
destroying capitalism, destroying society, destroying freedom and liberty. 
Global cooling, an ice age, in fact, they said was coming. 1979. Then global 
warming. Then they said the seas will rise and swallow the cities. Now, they call it climate 
change, meaning any foul weather or act of God will be attributed to the 
horrible capitalist system of progress and advancement in lifestyles which is 
being blamed for all of 
this. </p>

<p>They are never held to account for 
the inhumanity they propose and promote. No one ever studies the human suffering 
and toll that results from the left's policies, and thus they can continue to make claims 
and create images of salvation without ever having to answer for the untold 
damage they've already committed.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: You see where President 
Obama, in announcing how he intends to lose the war in Iraq 
-- sorry, Afghanistan -- or both, actually -- is going to do it, the national address 
will occur from West Point on December 1st. My question is, will 
they detain him? Hopefully.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: If it's science, and if 
it's the truth, and if 
you are so brilliant to have discovered it, let the world see it and earn your 
reputation and money that way. But that's not what this is about. This is about 
advancing socialism, liberalism, Marxism, whatever you want to call it. It's 
about advancing an agenda that takes people -- freedom away from people, their 
individuality. It destroys capitalism, and 
seeks to establish everybody under the auspices of a giant world government 
somewhere in the United Nations. That's what this is about. And it has been 
exposed. 
</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>Ladies' 
man</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p> 
LIMBAUGH: Chickification is exactly 
what the SEAL tem member 
-- SEAL team member described with the Tailhook situation and so 
forth. But I -- nevertheless, I understand what she's 
talking about. But let me tell you 
something. "Chickification" means precisely men stop being men. They've 
been neutered, and they 
just -- it results from 
a number of things. Nagging. In this case -- not nagging, but in this case it results 
from -- clearly these 
guys saw the way to the top is PC after Tailhook. That's the way to the top, PC. 
PC is destroying this country. It's destroying institutions left and 
right. 
</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author>G.L.</author>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911250037</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:08:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh:  Scientists Involved In Global Warming "Hoax" Should Be "Drawn And  Quartered"</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911240038</link>
<description><![CDATA[<h2>Rush: Obama "has a huge problem with 
this country and has for his entire life"</h2>

<p>As egotistical as usual, Rush kicked 
off his show by mentioning President 
Obama's press conference with India's prime minister, insinuating that 
Obama chose to begin the press conference at the exact time Rush's show begins 
in an attempt to draw people away from El Rushbo. Don't worry, though -- Rush assures us all he 
has "more drawing power."</p>

<p>Rush then related that third-quarter gross domestic 
product <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bea.gov%2Fnewsreleases%2Fnational%2Fgdp%2F2009%2Fpdf%2Fgdp3q09_2nd.pdf">has 
been revised downward to 2.8 percent instead of 3.5 percent</a>, and claimed he predicted this 
would happen. Rush then shared a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2F157.166.226.108%2F2009%2F11%2F24%2Fnews%2Feconomy%2Fconsumer_confidence%2Findex.htm">CNNMoney.com 
article</a> about consumer confidence increasing slightly. Rush then happily pointed out several figures 
in the article that contradicted the headline. </p>

<p>After claiming that nobody wrote a 
positive review about Obama's recent trip to Asia, Rush cheerfully related that the Drudge Report 
"unearthed another picture of Obama bowing," this time to Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao. Rush then <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fclips.mediamatters.org%2Fresearch%2F200911160014">falsely 
claimed</a> that <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ftheplumline.whorunsgov.com%2Fforeign-policy%2Fcheney-blasts-obamas-bow-but-cheney-served-two-presidents-who-bowed%2F">no 
other president</a> has ever bowed to foreign leaders. 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Oh! And Drudge has unearthed another picture of 
Obama bowing, this time to the Chinese premier. So, he bowed to two -- he bowed to the Japanese emperor, and he bowed to the Chinese prime minister or pres-- I forget which one. Wen Jintao [sic]. Well, the 
Chinese understandably got 
-- no. It's never understandable. American presidents don't bow to 
anybody. Except this one. It's never happened. Except this one. This one's running around 
bowing to everybody. 
</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush then complained that Fox News 
was the only television channel to report on "Climategate," claiming it exposed climate change as 
nothing more than a hijacking of our foreign policy. Yet again, Rush managed to 
avoid mentioning that these emails were reportedly stolen, and then later said he "doesn't care" how the 
information was obtained, either through a hacker or simply released. Back from 
a break, Rush explained again how liberals live in a universe of lying because 
of the questions at the Obama press conference about the upcoming Copenhagen 
climate talks. Rush again claimed the reportedly stolen emails hid information 
that shows climate change is false and declared that Copenhagen should simply be 
canceled as a result. As an aside, <em>Media 
Matters</em> did a little <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911230052">rebutting of 
false claims</a> about these emails yesterday. Unsurprisingly, Rush then 
turned to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911090029">money-losing</a> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910300016">right-wing rag</a> <em><a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwashingtontimes.com%2Fnews%2F2009%2Fnov%2F24%2Fhiding-evidence-of-global-cooling%2F">The 
Washington Times</a></em> to rant that scientists could lose credibility 
if these out-of-context and false 
allegations ever become mainstream.</p>

<p>Back from the first half-hour break, 
Rush launched into a rant about how everything in science, academia, 
and the media is corrupted and how 
it all serves a political agenda, just because Rush doesn't agree 
with the results. Rush continued his new favorite theme on the universe of lies 
that liberals live in, declaring that government, academia, the media, and science are 
corrupt to the core. Rush read what Obama said about science <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2009%2FPOLITICS%2F01%2F20%2Fobama.politics%2Findex.html">in his 
inaugural speech</a>, and 
then demanded that if Obama really believed what he said, he would 
declare a national emergency, 
stop all programs to save the planet, and cancel all tax hikes 
-- because in Rush's 
worldview, taxes have everything to do with science. Rush then engaged in yet 
another diatribe 
about global warming being a fraud and a hoax -- a theme he returned to throughout his 
show -- and 
demanded that Obama "investigate this scam" and "name names" to put science back 
in its rightful place.</p>
<h2>Rush shouts it to the mountaintops: 
"global warming, climate change 
-- how loudly do I have to shout it -- is a hoax!"</h2>

<p>Rush continued his delusional 
ranting, apparently convinced he speaks for everybody who is not part of the 
Obama 
administration, by declaring that "we are the enemy" of the 
country now, lamenting that it was no longer Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. He then 
engaged in what seems like the most glaring example of projection ever: 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: But if you live in the 
universe of lies, the last thing that you are governed by is the truth. The last 
thing you are governed by is reality. The only thing that matters to you is the 
advancement of your political agenda. And you tell yourself in the universe of 
lies that your agenda is so important the world will not survive without it and 
therefore you can lie, cheat, steal, destroy whoever you have to to get your 
agenda done because your opponents are evil, and in fighting evil, anything goes. There are no 
rules when you're in a fight with the devil. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>After another break, Rush complained 
that <em>The 
New York Times</em> and <em>The Washington Post</em> 
are trying to track down "the whistleblower," as Rush called the person who reportedly stole these 
emails, instead of 
investigating the fraud that Rush insists is exposed in the emails. (He pointedly mentioned at 
least twice that the emails were "confirmed authentic.")</p>

<p>Back for his second hour, the Doctor 
of Demagoguery demanded that the media "track down" Al Gore and interview him 
about the "fixed science" he still delusionally believes is exposed in the emails. 
Rush then turned to a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.telegraph.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fjamesdelingpole%2F100017393%2Fclimategate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming%2F">blog 
post</a> at the U.K. <em>Telegraph</em> and an <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052748704888404574547730924988354.html">opinion 
piece</a> in <em>The Wall Street 
Journal</em> to share yet more dubious claims that these emails are revelatory 
about climate change. Later during his show, Rush read a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Fnews%2F2009%2F091124%2Ffull%2F462397a.html">Nature News 
article</a> and was in disbelief that many scientists contacted for the article 
"doubt that the leak will have a lasting impact."</p>

<p>Next, apparently forgetting about 
the existence of <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911170049">Frank Luntz</a>, El Rushbo 
wondered why anybody would need a "wordsmith" to help shape messaging. After 
playing comments by Obama about the Copenhagen conference, Rush returned to his 
incredulous, vehement, repeated, and tiring declarations that global warming is 
a fraud and a 
hoax that never 
existed. Here at the Limbaugh Wire, we cannot emphasize enough how many times he 
denied that 
climate change existed throughout today's show. Finally, Rush 
slightly changed topics: </p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Nothing is real about 
health care. Nothing is real in the cap-and-trade legislation. Nothing is real about the 
stimulus package. Nothing is real about the TARP bailout. All of it is 
fraudulent. It's all a hoax. Perpetrated by the left knowing full well it's a 
hoax dressed up as something compassionate and emergency-required to save 
something, either jobs or the entire financial system of the world or whatever 
other threat will wipe us all out tomorrow if we don't act tonight. It's all a 
hoax. Everything the Democrat Party is behind today is a fraud and a lie aimed 
at separating you from two things: your freedom, your property, and your money. </p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Rush: Obama "is a small man, folks. 
This is a small and petty, spoiled little man"</h2>

<p>Rush then played a question and 
answer concerning Obama's upcoming decision on whether to increase the number of troops in Afghanistan and called him 
"a small and petty, spoiled little man." Naturally, Rush then turned to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fblogs%2Fbensmith%2F1109%2FCheney_at_length.html">former 
Vice President Dick Cheney</a> to attack 
Obama.</p>

<p>Back from another break, Rush 
professed to believe that <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911240027">Obama was hijacking 
Thanksgiving</a> by having an official state dinner during 
Thanksgiving week. In his third hour, in response to a caller, Rush nearly 
screamed about "a tent" being raised for the state dinner tonight. Rush then 
read a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcclatchydc.com%2F227%2Fstory%2F79380.html">McClatchy story</a> that 
apparently reveals that Obama will commit an additional 34,000 troops to 
Afghanistan. Rush then had a caller who compared supposed whistleblowing on 
these climate science emails, Afghanistan, and the health care bills to the 
revelation that the Earth is not flat. Quite unsurprisingly, Rush liked 
this comparison. Later on, Rush complained about Rep. David Obey's proposed surcharge tax to fund the war in Afghanistan, because it 
includes middle-class 
taxpayers. Rush declared his hope that the idea that Democrats will tax people 
making as little as $30,000 a year be "tied like Velcro" to the Democratic 
Party.</p>

<p>Coming back for another episode of 
fanatical denial of reality, Rush read an <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fspectator.org%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2F24%2Fclimate-gate-development-cei-f"><em title="http://spectator.org/blog/2009/11/24/climate-gate-development-cei-f">American Spectator</em> post</a> by the 
Competitive Enterprise Institute's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200909170036">Chris Horner</a>, detailing 
his intent to sue NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies for their 
supposed refusal to release documents from a Freedom of Information Act request. 
Rush then read yet another <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theregister.co.uk%2F2009%2F09%2F29%2Fyamal_scandal%2F">British newspaper 
article</a> to bash "quote, 'scientist,' unquote" Michael Mann. Rush was so incensed 
by Mann that he whined about him at the top of the third hour.</p>
<h2>Rush declares that "this hacker" is 
"a gift from God"</h2>

<p>For the beginning of his final hour 
of the day, Rush apologized for "being a one-trick pony today" and continued to rant about 
climate change being fake. Rush declared that people don't have to give up their SUVs, old washing 
machines, or 
incandescent light bulbs, which are surely near and dear to everyone's hearts. 
Seemingly unable to escape using Alex Jones' language for the past few days, 
Rush then claimed, 
"This issue, global warming, has been one of the foundational building blocks 
for a future world global government. It has been a way for displaced communists 
to get their hands on the inner workings of the freedom of the United States of 
America." It seemed no aspect of environmentalism was safe from Rush's 
unrighteous anger today, as later in his show, he ranted against recycling and Dumpster-diving.</p>

<p>Soon after, Rush again cited the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911190030">Alex Jones article he linked to 
on his website</a>. Later on, Rush treated us to an explanation of how his 
belief in God armored him against any possible effects of industrialization and 
massive consumption of natural resources, and then launched into his most offensive rant 
of the day: </p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: If you don't believe in 
God, then you probably are a global warmist or a liberal. You don't believe in 
the God of Christianity or the God of Judaism or any other God, but you have to make some God, there 
has to be something bigger than you, and so it's the global warming movement 
now, or it's health care, or it's Obama, or it's some earthly object that you 
apply godlike status 
to. Even atheists believe in something beyond themselves. But the point is, they have used and targeted 
children, scaring them to death with lies. Ted Turner's been doing it with 
Captain Planet cartoons, getting kids to hate big business. The left, my 
friends, is a truly evil bunch. 
</p>
</blockquote>

<p>For the final half-hour of his Tuesday show, 
Rush joined Andrew Breitbart on the ACORN-bashing bandwagon, treating the 
"document dump" as a bounty of evidence. Rush, apparently <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911220004">as ignorant as Breitbart</a> of 
what blackmail is, mentioned that Breitbart is "challenging" Attorney General 
Eric Holder to investigate ACORN, mocking any allegations of blackmail. Next, 
Rush played the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.time.com%2Ftime%2Fnation%2Farticle%2F0%2C8599%2C1940338%2C00.html%3Futm_source%3Dfeedburner%26utm_medium%3Dfeed%26utm_campaign%3DFeed%253A%2Btime%252Fnation%2B%2528TIME%253A%2BTop%2BNation%2BStories%2529">race</a> 
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2009%2F11%2F23%2FAR2009112304092.html%3Fhpid%3Dtopnews">card</a> 
to attack the stimulus and Obama's economic policies. </p>

<p>Seemingly a bit frustrated, Rush 
again harangued 
Obey for wanting a war surtax for his final segment of the day. After saying 
that our various past wars did nothing to end social programs, Rush abruptly 
reversed course and decided that it was fine if we stopped our current social 
spending, as long as we dumped it all into Afghanistan. Later, Rush decided to 
flip-flop again, claiming that Great Society spending was not stopped by the 
Vietnam War -- 
complaining that as an "entitlement" 
-- because it continues to this day. In his final act of 
projection of the day, 
Rush labeled Obey a "locoweed" for his views on spending 
priorities.</p>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow 
and Kate Conway contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh 
Wire.</em></p>
<h2>Highlights</h2>

<p><strong>Outrageous 
comments</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p> 
LIMBAUGH: The Asian tour should have 
delighted Obamaites as the proper expression of Obama's philosophy. Two equal 
nations, neither one more exceptional than the other, or any other, their 
systems merely different, not better or worse, simply chatting about mutual 
concerns. And he pretty much I think nails that. Obama is doing what he said he 
was going to do. He's 
-- it's 
-- and 
it's all, folks, about cutting this country down to size, because he has a huge 
problem with this country and has for this entire life.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: But I don't even know how you can write the story -- I don't know how you can 
write the story and ignore the proof that global warming, climate change -- how loudly do I have to 
shout it -- is a hoax! 
What take -- what does 
it take for people to understand it is a hoax? But if you live in the universe 
of lies, the last thing that you are governed by is the truth. The last thing 
you are governed by is reality. The only thing that matters to you is the 
advancement of your political agenda. And you tell yourself in the universe of 
lies that your agenda is so important the world will not survive without it and 
therefore you can lie, cheat, steal, destroy whoever you have to to get your 
agenda done because your opponents are evil, and in fighting evil, anything goes. There are no 
rules when you're in a fight with the devil.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: The people behind this health care bill know 
that everything they're saying about it is not true. It will not lower costs. It 
will not improve access. It will not improve quality. It will raise taxes. It 
will force you to give up freedom and put you in jail if you resist. Nothing is 
real about health care. Nothing is real in the cap-and-trade legislation. Nothing is real about the 
stimulus package. Nothing is real about the TARP bailout. All of it is 
fraudulent. It's all a hoax. Perpetrated by the left knowing full well it's a 
hoax dressed up as something compassionate and emergency-required to save 
something, either jobs or the entire financial system of the world or whatever 
other threat will wipe us all out tomorrow if we don't act tonight. It's all a 
hoax. Everything the Democrat Party is behind today is a fraud and a lie aimed 
at separating you from two things: your freedom, your property, and your 
money.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: This man is really small. 
Really tiny. Once again, "after eight years, some of those years in 
which we did not have, I think, either the resources or the strategy to get 
the job done, it is my intention to finish 
the job." This is a 
small man, folks. This is a small and petty, spoiled little 
man.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: This issue, global 
warming, has been one of the foundational building blocks for a future world 
global government. It has been a way for displaced communists to get their hands 
on the inner workings of the freedom of the United States of 
America.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Obama said he wants to 
restore science to its rightful whatever, then he ought to be leading the way to 
find out who these people are, what they've done, who they've infected, who went 
along with them, calling them out by name, making sure that every scientist at 
every university in this country who's been involved in this is named and fired, drawn and 
quartered, or whatever 
it is, because this is a worldwide hoax. And its primary target was you, the 
people of the United States of America.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: If you don't believe in 
God, then you probably are a global warmist or a liberal. You don't believe in 
the God of Christianity or the God of Judaism or any other God, but you have to make some God, there 
has to be something bigger than you, and so it's the global warming movement 
now, or it's health care, or it's Obama, or it's some earthly object that you 
apply godlike status 
to. Even atheists believe in something beyond themselves. But the point is, they have used and targeted 
children, scaring them to death with lies. Ted Turner's been doing it with 
Captain Planet cartoons, getting kids to hate big business. The left, my 
friends, is a truly evil bunch. 
</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>America's Truth 
Rejecter</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p> 
LIMBAUGH: Oh! And Drudge has unearthed another picture of 
Obama bowing, this time to the Chinese premier. So, he bowed to two -- he bowed to the Japanese emperor, and he bowed to the Chinese prime minister or pres-- I forget which one. Wen Jintao [sic]. Well, the 
Chinese understandably got 
-- no. It's never understandable. American presidents don't bow to 
anybody. Except this one. It's never happened. Except this one. This one's running around 
bowing to everybody. 
</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author>Z.P.</author>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911240038</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:22:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh: Climate Scientists Are  "Whoring Themselves Out For Money, Abandoning Science"</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911230036</link>
<description><![CDATA[<h2>Rush: Emails
stolen by hacking were "leaked" from a "whistleblower"</h2>

<p>By Zachary
Pleat</p>

<p>Wasting no
time as usual, Rush joined Glenn Beck in calling Sen.
Mary Landrieu (D-LA) "<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911230018">the
most expensive prostitute in the history of prostitution</a>." Rush then claimed that the hacked emails that were
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F11%2F21%2Fscience%2Fearth%2F21climate.html%3Fscp%3D1%26sq%3Dclimate%2520change%2Bemails%26st%3Dcse">reportedly stolen from the University of East Anglia</a> "are the real deal" and baselessly claimed that they
were "leaked" by a "whistleblower." As classy
as ever, Rush used these possibly illegally obtained
emails to continue his long-running claim that global warming is a hoax:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: These emails that we told you about last week from
that group in Great Britain that formed the basis for the UN's climate change
panel and their recommendations, those emails apparently now are the real deal
and they may not have been leaked -- well, leaked -- they may be from a
whistleblower inside the organization who is just unhappy with what's going on.
Now, the bottom line is, the whole global warming -- manmade global warming
movement is a fraud. It is a hoax. It's made-up lies.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Next, Rush
explained how "[l]iberalism
is a lie from top to bottom," then took the opportunity to bash President Obama for having run a campaign on, as he
put it, nothing but hope, change, and empty platitudes. During this typically
deranged rant, Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911190030">channeled
Alex Jones yet again</a>, saying that Democrats "believe in a one-world government." Rush's theme of liberalism being a lie continued throughout the rest of the
show. </p>

<p>Our kindly
radio host then explained that the congressional members, scientists, and others who are working
to combat climate change are "whoring themselves out for money." Still never
mentioning that these emails were hacked into and
possibly stolen, Rush then compared them to the Pentagon Papers. </p>

<p>Back from a
break, Rush was quite pleased to announce that <em>Saturday Night Live</em> is at
last making fun of Obama's policies and played the audio later in his show,
claiming they were showing Obama as "a doofus."
Rush later wondered if CNN would fact-check this one, and if they did, they'd find it was
spot on. Next, Rush read part of a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fdotearth.blogs.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F11%2F20%2Fprivate-climate-conversations-on-display%2F">blog
post</a> from his <a href="http://mediamatters.org/clips/200910200020">old, dear friend</a> Andrew
Revkin. Rush then claimed these allegedly stolen
emails show that climate change skeptics are not such a small group.</p>

<p>Rush then
turned his wonderful mind to analyzing the health care bills, complaining that
"it takes 2,000 pages" to insure everyone. Incidentally,
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Flivepulse%2F1109%2FSenate_bill_no_longer_than_Palins_book_Dems_say.html%3Fshowall">as
Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK)
said</a>, "This bill if you put in regular type style is about the
same size as Sarah Palin's book," which Rush said
was "<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911130014">one of the most substantive
policy books I've read</a>." Undeterred, Rush used his
world-renowned mathematical skills to claim
that the legislation is really 4,000 pages
of legislation once you add the total number of pages in the House and
Senate bills. Rush finished off his first hour by reading a rebuttal
email he wrote to a 24-year-old U.S. soldier who
made, in Rush's eyes, the unforgiveable mistake of pointing out that many
states require people to purchase car insurance to drive, so why not health
insurance?</p>
<h2>Rush: Obama
"is one of" America's
"internal perils"</h2>

<p>Continuing
with his manmade global warming is a hoax theme, Rush declared that a speech Obama gave to engineering students was nothing but "bilk." Instead of carbon emissions
being a danger, Rush declared that our "internal perils" include Obama.
Unsurprisingly, Rush then brought up Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Frank
Marshall David, and Obama's father, claiming that they don't want America to be
the engine of the world, and thus Obama doesn't want this either. </p>

<p>Back from
another break, Rush read from an <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fhostednews%2Fap%2Farticle%2FALeqM5hLzK033Jh4aJFhUF_nmu7SO9QY8gD9C4MO781">AP article</a> reporting
that the Guant&aacute;namo detainees that will be
put on trial for their role in the 9-11 attacks plan to plead not guilty, and
used this to repeat his claim that they will put the U.S. on trial. Rush must have been
in a jolly mood, as he then played his most
recent parody song, this time parodying Khalid
Shaikh Mohammed. </p>

<p>Later, Rush
took a caller who was angry about the Saturday vote on the Senate health care
bill, complaining that it was "a trick." Rush attempted to calm her down,
explaining that it was always going to pass the vote to begin debate. The caller then got slightly hysterical when she
started mentioning Hayek's <em>The Road to Serfdom</em>. Rush assured her that
she's "doing the right thing" by reading the book, which he called "great."</p>

<p>Rush then endorsed the
use of the possibly
illegally obtained emails: "I am for anything that exposes truth."</p>

<p>Back from a
half-hour break, a caller lectured Rush on the ethical problems that would come from using illegally obtained
emails to attack climate change. Rush responded that "we don't know" they were
stolen, repeating his claim that it was a whistleblower who released the
emails.</p>

<p>After
playing the clips from <em>Saturday Night Live</em> parodying Obama's policies,
which Rush emphasized were highly significant, Rush took
a call from a woman who mentioned the concern in poor island nations that
climate change is causing more malaria
outbreaks. Rush said this was the fault of Rachel Carson, who he said "we got
scammed by." He then launched into an explanation of how leaders don't care
about people, and that island nations are worried about rising sea levels "when
they aren't" rising.</p>

<p>Next, Rush
happily announced that Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is the GOP's best
shot to keep Arizona's
governorship, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rasmussenreports.com%2Fpublic_content%2Fpolitics%2Felections2%2Felection_2010%2Felection_2010_governor_elections%2Farizona%2Felection_2010_arizona_governor_election">according
to a Rasmussen report</a>. Rush rounded off the second hour by mentioning the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fblogs%2Fblog-briefing-room%2Fnews%2F68775-dem-lawmakers-introduce-afghan-war-surtax">Afghan
war surtax</a> introduced by Democratic lawmakers, but brushed it off, stating
that taxpayers already pay for wars.</p>
<h2>Rush, the
model college dropout, tells his story</h2>

<p>Rush
started off his final hour of the day complaining that a listener sent him an
email wishing him "happy holidays." Here at
the Limbaugh Wire we will be sure not to
offend Rush by wishing him well this holiday season. Rush then <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Frenovomedia.com%2Fnews%2Fcanadian-woman-nathalie-blanchard-loses-benefits-over-facebook-photos%2F">read
an article</a> about a woman claiming her long-term sick leave benefits were
revoked after Facebook photos were purportedly used to undermine her medical leave. He
then explained his real problem with this:
imagine if the government could do this. After all, Rush said, the woman could
just get another insurance policy. Rush then read much of a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spiegel.de%2Finternational%2Fworld%2F0%2C1518%2C662822%2C00.html">Spiegel
Online</a> article that just happened to agree
with Rush on his views of Obama's actions overseas. Apparently adopting Spiegel
Online as his favorite new news source, Rush also mentioned an <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spiegel.de%2Finternational%2Fworld%2F0%2C1518%2C662814%2C00.html">article</a>
detailing possible problems with Germany
cooperating in the trials of 9-11 detainees, because Germany prohibits capital punishment.
Naturally, Rush used this as an opportunity to play his new KSM parody again. </p>

<p>After
another break, Rush had on a caller who wanted to educate the nation about <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cancer.gov%2Fcancertopics%2Ffactsheet%2FSites-Types%2FIBC">inflammatory
breast cancer</a>, saying that most doctors don't recognize it, and mammograms
rarely detect it. Of course, the caller claimed that if we had "a rationed
health care system," many people would die from
this, something he repeated at least twice. Rush was incredulous by the cost of
the treatment for this cancer, and used this as an opportunity to rail against
health care reform again, claiming it was not about health care, but about
money.</p>

<p>Back for
the final half hour of Monday's show, Rush read an <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fstory%2F0%2C2933%2C576148%2C00.html">article</a> about Lincoln University mandating students pass a
fitness course to graduate. Rush, who spent much of this year drawing attention
to his weight loss program, wondered "how we know" that the country is in an
obesity epidemic. </p>

<p>After Rush
briefly mentioned out of nowhere that Tamiflu no longer works on the swine flu,
Rush treated us to his sad sob story about how and why he dropped out of
college. We leave you with his words:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
When I was in college, like,
my full first year and only year, what
finally drove me out of it were two things: flunking speech, which was my
business, and being forced to take ballroom dance, taught by a drill sergeant
in the WACs [Women's Army Corps] as a phys ed
course. I said, wait a minute. They told me when I got here, and they told me in
high school that when I got here I'm on my own. Now,
we're not going to be babied up here, and
they're not -- they don't call the roll; they don't do any of that. It's
up to you to show up. Hell, they call the roll in college more than they do -- more than they
did in high school. </p>

<p>And that
ballroom -- I just didn't go. I just couldn't
bring myself to go. I went to the radio station instead. And, of course, the college sent a letter home to my
parents. This is back in the -- you -- that can't happen now. You know -- Dawn, do you know
that you're not allowed to see your daughter's grades? She has to be the one to
tell you. You can't see them. So, you -- yeah, but that's only cause she gave it to you.
If she didn't give you the password, you wouldn't --
you wouldn't even know -- she could flunk out a
semester and not tell you and still have you support her up there. You would never know it unless she told you, because the school can't write you. </p>

<p>But back
then, a university wrote my mom and dad a letter saying that I had not shown up
to ballroom dance. And, of course, this outraged and embarrassed my parents. I was the first member of my family and the probably only member of my family not to graduate from college. You know, I do interviews with people,
"Yeah, man, I'm happy to be here and this
is my -- I'm the first member of my family to ever
go to school."</p>

<p>I'm the
only member of my family that didn't, and that
bothered them and embarrassed them and so forth. So my mother took away the car
I bought, and drove me to college class -- ballroom dance after
I had missed it for a month.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow and Kate Conway contributed to this edition of the
Limbaugh Wire.</em></p>
<h2>Highlights</h2>

<p><strong>Outrageous comments</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
Now when you hear a Democrat go on television and solemnly pronounce, as
Senator Ben Nelson did, "No health care if no change in public option and
abortion funding," or Mary Landrieu, "I will not vote for this as it is
written," they are not espousing core beliefs. They are simply opening
bids. They are simply making opening bids to Harry Reid.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
You know, liberals are liberals wherever you find them, in the global warming
movement, in the health care movement, in the U.S. Congress, in the White House
-- wherever they are. Liberalism is a lie from top to bottom.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
If the Democrats on Capitol Hill and Obama were honest about what the real
purpose of their health care bill is -- to raise taxes, to totally control
every aspect of human life in this country --they would never, ever even got
this far with it. If the global warming people had said, "We are aligned with
our liberal socialist brothers all over the world. We believe in a one-world
government and we believe that the United States has too much of the world's
wealth, so we are going to create a crisis that is designed to make Americans
think that they are destroying the planet so that they will then feel guilty
and that they will feel guilty over polar bears being killed and so forth;
we'll get their kids all in line, and then we're going to go for world
government and world tax increases to fleece the United States so that we can
join our leftist brothers in the United States to control that population and
as much of the world as we can." </p>

<p>If they had
said that, they would have never convinced one person to sell an SUV. If they
had said that, they had never have convinced one person to buy a Prius. My
point is, they cannot be honest about their intentions; they cannot be honest
about their agenda; they cannot be honest about who they are.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
Years ago, folks, years ago on this program, I explained that communists,
leftist ideologues flocked to the environmental movement after the end of the
Cold War. Collectivists found cover for their new agenda, and the collectivists
attracted leftist pseudo-scientists who were milking the scam for grants from
corporation, universities, and government entities. There are so many whores in
our midst -- from members of Congress, members of the U.S. Senate, and members
of the scientific community -- who are whoring themselves out for money,
abandoning science, the pursuit of truth, in exchange for advancing a leftist
political agenda.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
So these emails have been published. The lie is now there for all to see. The
Bernie Madoffs of global warming were caught. And, hopefully, this is the final
nail in the coffin for cap and trade.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
We are in a war. We are in a war to save the United States of America from being
remade into something that you and I would not recognize it -- or recognize.
And people are very much alarmed about this. I am for anything that exposes
truth. Truth has become too big a casualty in our culture, in our society, in
our media, and in our politics. Everything, it seems, is a lie to one degree or
another. And the people who do not go along with the lie, who do not believe
the lie, are called extremists. </p>

<p>Somebody in
this organization, if it's a whistleblower, one of two things: either
somebody's got their nose out of joint over the way they're being treated by
somebody in that organization or they've got a guilty conscience, and they can
no longer sit by and be part of this while they watch an absolute fraud and
hoax take place. So I myself am never alarmed when the truth happens, when the
truth is made, when the truth is revealed. I am not bothered.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
They're suffering from malaria in a lot of parts of the world because we got
scammed by a woman named Rachel Carson, who led to the banning of DDT. If we
just put DDT back in, we'd cut malaria dramatically.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>Enemies list</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
We do live in a world of unprecedented perils and now they include internal
perils and he is one of them.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>Fascism watch</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
Now, my friends, health care, the entire Obama agenda -- stimulus, porkulus,
whatever -- the entire Obama agenda -- the auto bailout, the cash for clunkers,
the home tax credit thing -- every one of those items is the same kind of fraud
as is the manmade global warming hoax. It is being advanced by the same kind of
people for the same kind of reasons because they are all liberals-slash-socialists-slash-communists-slash
fascists.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>America's Truth Rejecter</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
These emails that we told you about last week from that group in Great Britain
that formed the basis for the UN's climate change panel and their
recommendations, those emails apparently now are the real deal and they may not
have been leaked -- well, leaked -- they may be from a whistleblower inside the
organization who is just unhappy with what's going on. Now, the bottom line is,
the whole global warming -- manmade global warming movement is a fraud. It is a
hoax. It's made-up lies.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>Echo chamber</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
That may be, folks -- that may be the most
expensive prostitute in the history of prostitution. And she's bragging about
it -- Mary Landrieu, bragging
about $300 million payoff from Dingy Harry to
get her vote on this health care scam on
Saturday night.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>Vox populi</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
When I was in college, like,
my full first year and only year, what
finally drove me out of it were two things: flunking speech, which was my
business, and being forced to take ballroom dance, taught by a drill sergeant
in the WACs [Women's Army Corps] as a phys ed
course. I said, wait a minute. They told me when I got here, and they told me in
high school that when I got here I'm on my own. Now,
we're not going to be babied up here, and
they're not -- they don't call the roll; they don't do any of that. It's
up to you to show up. Hell, they call the roll in college more than they do -- more than they
did in high school. </p>

<p>And that
ballroom -- I just didn't go. I just couldn't
bring myself to go. I went to the radio station instead. And, of course, the college sent a letter home to my
parents. This is back in the -- you -- that can't happen now. You know -- Dawn, do you know
that you're not allowed to see your daughter's grades? She has to be the one to
tell you. You can't see them. So, you -- yeah, but that's only cause she gave it to you.
If she didn't give you the password, you wouldn't --
you wouldn't even know -- she could flunk out a
semester and not tell you and still have you support her up there. You would never know it unless she told you, because the school can't write you. </p>

<p>But back
then, a university wrote my mom and dad a letter saying that I had not shown up
to ballroom dance. And, of course, this outraged and embarrassed my parents. I was the first member of my family and the probably only member of my family not to graduate from college. You know, I do interviews with people,
"Yeah, man, I'm happy to be here and this
is my -- I'm the first member of my family to ever
go to school."</p>

<p>I'm the
only member of my family that didn't, and that
bothered them and embarrassed them and so forth. So my mother took away the car
I bought, and drove me to college class -- ballroom dance after
I had missed it for a month.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911230036</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:35:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh:  "Democrats Are The Equivalent Of Political Suicide Bombers"</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911200042</link>
<description><![CDATA[<h2>Rush: Democrats
have become the "Kamikaze party"</h2>

<p>By Tom Allison</p>

<p>Rush seemed
genuinely happy to have the week done with, saying he
was tired of dealing with all the "garbage" of the week, and <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911160039">again characterized</a> his efforts as "going to war":</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I'm telling you what --
this week has seemed like a week to me. I mean,
every day seems like a day -- well, I mean, dealing with this garbage? Getting up every day and
going to war, you know. And I'm asking for more troops,
too. And I can't call any of them up on my own.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Echoing a
lot of conservative media today, including Glenn Beck fill-in Pat Gray and Michael Savage, Rush claimed that Senate
Democrats "bought" Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) and
other Democrats, "the same thing Nancy Pelosi did in the House." Rush concluded that the Democrats have become the "Kamikaze party" and the "equivalent of political suicide bombers" because they
plan on voting on a bill that, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200910140026">to Rush at least</a>, is
unpopular with American voters and will bankrupt the country.</p>

<p>Rush
justified his outrageous comparison of Democrats to suicide bombers with
numerous falsehoods. Perhaps he was inspired by having Sarah
Palin on his show on Tuesday because he <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26source%3Dweb%26oi%3Dvideo_result%26ct%3Dres%26cd%3D5%26ved%3D0CBUQtwIwBA%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fmediamatters.org%252Fmmtv%252F200908130021%26ei%3Dk9MGS7moFIKolAfwmayFBA%26usg%3DAFQjCNHjqn1wzHzCRg0mKNk2QAFwDTthnA%26sig2%3DmBlsspw9emhQtADkOhrnPg">again
claimed</a> that there are death panels in the legislation
that will decide who, among the elderly, will live and die. Second, Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911180013">falsely claimed</a> that
Americans "can be put in jail for failing to buy health insurance." And finally (and predictably among the Limbaugh Wire
crew), Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911200026">jumped on
the</a> "government is taking away your mammograms"<sup>TM</sup>
bandwagon.</p>

<p>Wrapping up
a very busy first segment, Limbaugh read from reports that Gallup
will put Obama's approval rating below 50 percent and criticized Obama's trip to Asia.</p>

<p>Back from
the break, Rush mocked MSNBC's Norah O'Donnell as
"brave" when she "grilled" <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911180038">Palin
supporters</a> in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
He went on:
"It takes guts to grill a 14-year-old." Too bad Palin <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fblogs%2Fmichaelcalderone%2F1109%2FPalin_fan_responds_to_ODonnell_interview.html">commented</a>
that the supporter herself claims she's 17.
Rush went back to correct himself, naturally blaming his staff for misinforming
him. </p>
<h2>Rush:
"That mammogram stuff ... it's in the bill"</h2>

<p>Rush's
first caller kicked off some <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911200024">fearmongering</a> about
the government task force's non-binding
recommendations:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Who was it? Democrats? Somebody's out there saying -- maybe it's Health and Human Services -- "No, no, no. That
mammogram stuff, that's not -- that -- we're not --
that's not going to be part of the bill. We're not going to accept that recommendation." But it's in the bill. It's in Senator Reid's bill; it's over in the House bill
-- the delay of mammograms until the age
50. The whole thing here, Natalie, is very
basic. Why in the world should you have to be told by a government when and
when you can not get your breasts looked at?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush
promoted this James Taranto <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2Fbest_of_the_web_today.html">op-ed</a> in <em>The Wall Street Journal </em>criticizing Obama
as incompetent and a
climate change skeptic website, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fclimatedepot.com%2F">climatedepot.com</a>.
He also hyped an American Thinker <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2Fscientific_scandal_appears_to.html">blog</a>
post that reported on allegedly hacked emails from Britain's Hadley Centre that show climate
scientists covering up data that undermine claims that the planet is warming.</p>

<p>Rush's
second caller hoped for a Palin presidential
run in 2012 because Obama would be re-elected in a landslide. Rush defended
Palin, claiming <em>Going Rogue</em> is "full of policy" and commented that she
is more patriotic than Obama and loves America more. </p>

<p>Inexplicably,
Rush concluded the first hour commenting that anyone who supported John Edwards
for president or vice president has no
credibility in criticizing Sarah Palin.</p>

<p>Rush then segued into a criticism
of the left for using children in environmental protection and
healthcare reform ads:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Ah, my friends, this is just
-- this is -- isn't this wonderful?
Exploiting kids like this, lying to kids, and
then making the kids go out and lie, scaring
the kids. This is from the president's website.
This, essentially, has his endorsement. This is just sick.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush then
played one of his lovely parody advertisements featuring children of the EIB...</p>

<p>Rush spent
a lot of time reminiscing about his 25 years as host of <em>The Rush Limbaugh Show</em>, informing
his sure-to-be-disappointed listeners that he does not plan on
launching his own 24-hour
cable channel like Oprah Winfrey. </p>

<p>Once again
echoing a tired conservative falsehood, Rush suggested that Sen. Harry Reid is somehow being disingenuous over
the Senate's health care reform bill because
taxes are front-ended and benefits start a few years later, despite CBO's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911200019">estimate</a> that the bill
will continue to reduce the deficit:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Then we heard --
and we know it's true -- that when they send
these bills down to the Congressional Budget
Office to get scored, they have to score them in 10-year
increments. I guess that's policy. And the way they
come in with these low numbers like Reid got for $848
billion is that the health care aspect doesn't start --
the benefits, the spending doesn't start until year three or four, but the tax
increases and everything else start immediately.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush also
postulated that the Democrats will be in
trouble in 2012 because voters will be feeling
the new taxes but not feeling the benefits, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911190051">ignoring the benefits</a>
that would begin right away. </p>

<p>Rush read
from this <em>Real Clear Politics</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.realclearpolitics.com%2Fhorseraceblog%2F2009%2F11%2Fhave_democratic_leaders_gone_m.html">post</a>
on how the proposed cuts to Medicare, designed to reduce fraud and waste, would
be the Democrats' downfall. </p>

<p>Moving on,
Rush read from a <em>Politico </em>article on Obama "receiving friendly fire" on
the economy and suggested that the likes of Rep. Maxine Waters are upset only
because the Congressional Black Caucus are getting "shut out of the slush
fund." </p>

<p>Later, Rush
told a caller that it was "an interesting statistic" that last winter in
Fairbanks, Alaska,
was colder than the winter that Al Gore was born, as if picking temperatures
from the same day 50 years apart <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200906150021">has anything to do</a> with
long-term trending climate change. </p>

<p>Back from
the break, Rush reminded his listeners that
Obama's half-brother in Kenya doesn't
have running water, and claimed that that's how the environmentalists would
have all of us live: "with a hole in the
backyard." </p>

<p>Claiming
that "there's nothing Democratic about the Democratic Party," Rush ranted about
the Democrats wanting dictatorial powers over the country:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I think people do not understand who these people
are. I don't think people have an understanding of just how radically left, anti-capitalist, anti-liberty these people are. I
don't think people understand how devoted these people are to the government
being the single citadel in this country for everybody. </p>

<p>I don't think people understand their radical thirst for
total power. People do not understand that people like Pelosi and Reid and
Barney Frank and Barack Obama and the Congressional Black Caucus, practically 80 percent of the Democrats in the House and Senate, have been yearning for this for their entire lives, many of them since the '60s.
This is their utopia. They don't care; they've got it. It's within their grasp.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush then
returned to his "Democrats as political suicide
bombers" analogy, expanding his vision of health care
as a suicide terrorist attack:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I wish I could come up with an analogy that would
properly convey the excitement, the passion, the single-mindedness they have
about gaining, finally, after 200 years,
dictatorial control over the U.S.
government. That's what's going on. But, see, people don't
want to look at it that way. You say that and "Oh,
Rush. Come on. This is just
standard Democrat/Republican party politics." </p>

<p>No, it's not. It has gone
way beyond that. These people, they're going to get --
here's the analogy: If they get this -- remember, I call
them political suicide bombers. They're strapping the bombs on. The bombs are these
health care bills -- they're
going to get, with this bill, if it's signed into law, they're going to get
their 72 virgins. They're
going to get a lifetime supply of Viagra or Cialis --
their choice -- and they're not going to die. </p>

<p>They're going to get the 72 virgins in their offices or in
the Capitol wading pool, or wherever they want them. And the Cialis and the
Viagra, whatever it is, part of the health care plan that they will sign up for.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Right. Like
Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbsnews.com%2Fstories%2F2006%2F06%2F27%2Fnational%2Fmain1753947.shtml">has
any place</a> in making jokes about Viagra...</p>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow and Kate
 Conway contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh Wire.</em></p>
<h2>Highlights</h2>

<p><strong>Outrageous comments</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I'm telling you what -- this week has seemed like a week to me. I mean, every day seems like a day
-- well, I mean, dealing with this garbage?
Getting up every day and going to war, you know.
And I'm asking for more troops, too. And I can't call any of them up on my own.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I can't read the tea leaves on this, and the
reason I can't is Reid's buying votes. He bought Mary Landrieu with a $100-million provision in the health care bill -- Medicare exceptions for the state of Louisiana -- and it's a page-and-a-half long this
little attachment to the bill -- well, it's not
attached to it, it's part of it -- and it
allows states who have suffered a major natural disaster within the last four
years, three days, and 10
hours -- I mean,
it zeroes in on Hurricane Katrina -- then you
are eligible for $100 million additional in
Medicare for the old folks and blah blah blah. </p>

<p>Landrieu is in trouble -- re-election down there --
and she needs to buy votes herself. Reid needs
to buy votes. This is what Pelosi was doing over in the House. She was buying
votes by giving individual members whatever they wanted.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Democrats are the equivalent of political suicide
bombers. They have strapped political bombs to themselves. They are hell-bent
on taking out as many Americans as they can with them. This is how this must be
looked at. There is nothing remotely good about any of this. There's nothing
compassionate about any of this. Just before they detonate their political
bombs, which is what their votes against the wishes of the people they serve
are, they may as well shout "Death to freedom! Death to freedom!" as
they cast their vote.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Who was it? Democrats? Somebody's out there saying -- maybe it's Health and Human Services -- "No, no, no. That
mammogram stuff, that's not -- that -- we're not --
that's not going to be part of the bill. We're not going to accept that recommendation." But it's in the bill. It's in Senator Reid's bill; it's over in the House bill
-- the delay of mammograms until the age
50. The whole thing here, Natalie, is very
basic. Why in the world should you have to be told by a government when and
when you can not get your breasts looked at?</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Ah, my friends, this is just
-- this is -- isn't this wonderful?
Exploiting kids like this, lying to kids, and
then making the kids go out and lie, scaring
the kids. This is from the president's website.
This, essentially, has his endorsement. This is just sick.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Then we heard --
and we know it's true -- that when they send
these bills down to the Congressional Budget
Office to get scored, they have to score them in 10-year
increments. I guess that's policy. And the way they
come in with these low numbers like Reid got for $848
billion is that the health care aspect doesn't start --
the benefits, the spending doesn't start until year three or four, but the tax
increases and everything else start immediately.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I think people do not understand who these people
are. I don't think people have an understanding of just how radically left, anti-capitalist, anti-liberty these people are. I
don't think people understand how devoted these people are to the government
being the single citadel in this country for everybody. </p>

<p>I don't think people understand their radical thirst for
total power. People do not understand that people like Pelosi and Reid and
Barney Frank and Barack Obama and the Congressional Black Caucus, practically 80 percent of the Democrats in the House and Senate, have been yearning for this for their entire lives, many of them since the '60s.
This is their utopia. They don't care; they've got it. It's within their grasp.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I wish I could come up with an analogy that would
properly convey the excitement, the passion, the single-mindedness they have
about gaining, finally, after 200 years,
dictatorial control over the U.S.
government. That's what's going on. But, see, people don't
want to look at it that way. You say that and "Oh,
Rush. Come on. This is just
standard Democrat/Republican party politics." </p>

<p>No, it's not. It has gone
way beyond that. These people, they're going to get --
here's the analogy: If they get this -- remember, I call
them political suicide bombers. They're strapping the bombs on. The bombs are these
health care bills -- they're
going to get, with this bill, if it's signed into law, they're going to get
their 72 virgins. They're
going to get a lifetime supply of Viagra or Cialis --
their choice -- and they're not going to die. </p>

<p>They're going to get the 72 virgins in their offices or in
the Capitol wading pool, or wherever they want them. And the Cialis and the
Viagra, whatever it is, part of the health care plan that they will sign up for.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911200042</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:33:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rush Promotes Article  From 9-11 Truther Alex Jones' Website</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911190044</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p><strong>By Zachary
Pleat</strong></p>
<h2>Rush
wonders about Rev. Jesse Jackson: "[C]an
you throw so many parties for yourself as this guy does and still call yourself
a black man?"</h2>

<p>America's Truth
Rejecter started off this Thursday wondering
where his call screener Bo Snerdley was,
suspecting him of taking a nap on El Rushbo's time. Rush, with his $400
million, eight-year contract, then professed his mocking concern over new
unemployment numbers. Rush then used a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rasmussenreports.com%2Fpublic_content%2Fbusiness%2Fjobs_employment%2Fnovember_2009%2Fdemocrats_unaffiliateds_more_likely_to_be_unemployed_than_republicans">reportedly
said</a>, "You can't vote against health care and call yourself a black man."
Rush then complained about the amount of parties thrown for Jackson, and made a quite unfunny quip about
this before heading to a commercial break:</p>
<blockquote>

<p> LIMBAUGH: The reception celebrating
the 25th anniversary of Jackson's
run for president, though, is not to be confused with Mr. Jackson's birthday
celebration, which was Friday, November 13, 2009, which was held in Beverly Hills at the
Beverly Hilton hotel. So less than a week ago,
there was a birthday party for the Reverend Jackson,
and then there was a reception six days later --
five days later for the 25th anniversary of his
run for president. For some people, life, I guess, just one big party. I
wonder, can you throw so many parties for yourself as this guy does and still
call yourself a black man?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Back from
the break, Rush quickly blamed the announcement by AOL to cut a third of its
employees on "the policies of Jesse Jackson."</p>

<p>Rush then
used the infamous <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200910200042">conspiracy theorist</a>
Alex Jones' <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prisonplanet.com%2Fwith-hurricanes-at-thirty-year-low-gore-turns-to-photoshop.html">website</a>
to engage in some Al Gore bashing, gleefully pointing out the Photoshopped
changes in a picture of the Earth taken by NASA for his newest book, to
highlight the dangers of climate change. Rush loved this article so much that
he <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911190030">linked
to it at the top of his website</a>. Later in his show, Rush read part of a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spiegel.de%2Finternational%2Fworld%2F0%2C1518%2C662092%2C00.html">Spiegel Online</a> article that reported on
problems with temperatures in climate models. </p>

<p>Back from
another break, Rush complained Kathleen Sebelius was blaming Bush appointees
for the new mammogram examination recommendations. Rush then embraced former
Attorney General John Ashcroft's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fblogs%2Fblog-briefing-room%2Fnews%2F68373-ashcroft-holder-lacks-legal-authority-to-order-terror-trials">claim</a>
that "Holder lacks authority to make a decision on moving terror detainees to
civilian courts for trial." Rush says this shows that it was really President
Obama's decision, and everyone in Washington
is lying about it. Rush spent some time discussing the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911190010">supposed lack</a>
of legal precedent for trying "enemy combatants" from "the battlefield" in
federal court, declaring that "this is insidious" and that this was purely
political, later correcting himself to say it was ideology driving this. Rush would continue complaining about this later on in
his show. </p>
<h2>Rush: "[T]he original goal of the ACLU was to totally break down
the US
justice system"</h2>

<p>Rush then
continued his tired attacks against Obama, this time roping in Eric Holder:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>Obama's
view of the United States
is no different than that of a third-world Marxist dictator. That's how he
views this country. Immoral, unjust, evil, unequal, discriminatory, all of
those things. With every passing day, ladies
and gentlemen, the core beliefs of Obama, Eric Holder, everybody in this
administration are revealed -- damn the public,
damn national security, full steam ahead. We're going to fix what we find wrong
about this country.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush then
took a call from an unemployed newspaper reporter who took him to task for his
past attacks on any kind of government assistance:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>CALLER:
I heard you say something before that just really annoyed me. You said
something about unemployment and about all these extensions for unemployment,
that all these extensions are discouraging people from looking for work. You
have got to be kidding. You've got to be kidding. What, do you think people are
sitting back and, like, you know, like, enjoying all this time off, when nobody
has any idea of they're going to be able to get a job?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>After being
thoroughly stung by the caller from the first hour, Rush used much of the top
half of his second hour by defending himself from her accusations. Naturally,
he used this to bash government assistance to the poor for a while. Rush then
could not help himself from attacking the caller -- who was no longer on
the line -- suggesting that the reason she is unemployed is because
"she's obnoxious." Rush continued to spew his usual tired rhetoric about
individualism for a while, eventually getting around to his new conspiracy
theory that <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911190024">Obama is
turning Americans into "dependent, compliant servants" in order to
"perpetuate power in perpetuity."</a>
Say that fives times fast. </p>

<p>Rounding
out the first half of the hour, Rush took a caller who congratulated him for
his response to the previous caller and wanted to talk about the Senate health
care bill. Rush used this as an opportunity to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fimages%2Fstories%2Fwhitepapers%2Fpdf%2Fearlydeliverables.pdf">falsely
claim</a> that nothing in the bill except taxes kick in until 2013. Later on,
several other callers came to Rush's rescue.</p>

<p>Back from
another break, Rush claimed Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was lying about
everything he said about the Senate health care bill, especially that it would be deficit neutral, a concept Rush
just can't bring himself to understand. Next, Rush treated us to a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Frepublicanleader.house.gov%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D690">blog post</a> by House
Republican Leader John Boehner concerning abortion coverage in the Senate
health care bill as nothing but the unvarnished truth, reading much of it verbatim.
Rush then read a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fcorner.nationalreview.com%2Fpost%2F%3Fq%3DYTRjNGQyOTQ3ZGY3YmFjNjJiMjJjOGI1YjhmZDNlYmE">National
Review Online blog post</a> to complain about the bill being a "pretty
expensive policy." Later on, Rush put aside his disdain for the liberal elite
from Ivy League universities to hype a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052748704431804574539581994054014.html"><em>Wall
Street Journal </em>op-ed piece</a> by the dean of Harvard Medical
 School, who criticized
the debate on health care reform.</p>

<p>Back for
the final hour of the day, Rush decided to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fblogs%2Fblog-briefing-room%2Fnews%2F68603-conyers-im-getting-tired-of-saving-obamas-can">air
some progressive criticism</a> of the health care bills for a change, but
unsurprisingly claimed Obama was just lying to everybody, and would really
deliver the single-payer health care that Rep. John Conyers wants.</p>
<h2>Rush again
uses Ted Kennedy to wax non-poetically on "the will to live"</h2>

<p>Weighing in
on the mammogram recommendations issue <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911180024">again</a>, Rush decided
to compare mammograms to door locks and home security systems, and expanded on
this. As is his wont, he framed it as a fight between the government and
individual liberty:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>
LIMBAUGH: To limit our options
regarding medical care is an assault. It is an attack. And people are going to
defend themselves against this. Anybody who wants to interfere with the pursuit
of life, liberty and happiness can screw off as far as I'm concerned. They have
a fight on their hands. This is a matter of self-defense. We're all playing
defense now, against our own government, against our own president.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Back from
yet another break, Rush read a story about a
shortage of Eggo waffles due to flooding, which Peabody-winning fake
conservative news show host Stephen Colbert <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comedycentral.com%2Fcolbertreport%2Ffull-episodes%2Findex.jhtml%3FepisodeId%3D256184">covered
on his show last night</a>. Rush, who constantly stigmatizes people requiring
government assistance, then ranted about poor students who were missing out on
free breakfast at their schools, mocking the
possibility that the children feel stigmatized for needing help.</p>

<p>Rush then
had his new favorite dittohead, the woman who arranged for Rush's parody of
children singing about President Obama, on
the phone for a while. Over the course of the call, the caller claimed that
birth control led to cancer, and Rush chimed in that abortions may increase
breast cancer risks, a claim refuted by the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cancer.gov%2Fcancertopics%2Ffactsheet%2FRisk%2Fabortion-miscarriage">National
Cancer Institute</a> and the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cancer.org%2Fdocroot%2Fcri%2Fcontent%2Fcri_2_6x_can_having_an_abortion_cause_or_contribute_to_breast_cancer.asp">American
Cancer Society</a>.</p>

<p>After that
egregious falsehood, Rush told a story that, for a change, made him more like
everybody else; he forgot to pay his American Express bill, and seemed a bit
turned off by the way he was treated. So it turns out that despite his fortune
and "talent on loan from God", Rush, too, is
occasionally helplessly disgruntled with the voice at the other end of the
phone. </p>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow and Kate
 Conway contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh Wire.</em></p>
<h2><strong>Highlights
</strong></h2>

<p><strong>Outrageous
comments</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: The reception celebrating the 25th anniversary of Jackson's
run for president, though, is not to be confused with Mr. Jackson's birthday
celebration, which was Friday, November 13, 2009, which was held in Beverly Hills at the
Beverly Hilton hotel. So less than a week ago,
there was a birthday party for the Reverend Jackson,
and then there was a reception six days later --
five days later for the 25th anniversary of his
run for president. For some people, life, I guess, just one big party. I
wonder, can you throw so many parties for yourself as this guy does and still
call yourself a black man?</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Believe me when I tell you Barack Obama and Eric
Holder have the mentality of the ACLU. Remember, the original goal of the ACLU
was to totally break down the U.S.
justice system. That was the original objective. That's why they were -- that why they
formed. Obama and Eric Holder are the highest officials in a society they do
not like and they do not trust. They wish to
change it whether the public likes it or not. Obama -- I think it's Victor Davis Hanson who said it -- Obama's view of
the United States
is no different than that of a third-world Marxist dictator. That's how he
views this country. Immoral, unjust, evil, unequal, discriminatory, all of
those things. With every passing day, ladies
and gentlemen, the core beliefs of Obama, Eric Holder, everybody in this
administration are revealed -- damn the public,
damn national security, full steam ahead. We're going to fix what we find wrong
about this country.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I also understand what Obama and the left are
doing. They are not only trying to transform our society, my friends, they are
trying to transform the people from earnest, positive, innovative people to
dependent, compliant servants. They want you believing that you're only hope is
the government. They want you turning to the government for more and more. It
is their desire to perpetuate their power in perpetuity, forever. Because the
more people that depend on Obama personally or the government for the basics of
life, the more people that will continue to vote for those people out of fear
those basics will not be provided by different people, a different party.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: To limit our options regarding medical care is an
assault. It is an attack. And people are going to defend themselves against
this. Anybody who wants to interfere with the pursuit of life, liberty and
happiness can screw off as far as I'm concerned. They have a fight on their
hands. This is a matter of self-defense. We're all playing defense now, against
our own government, against our own president.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>"Socialism"
watch</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: This is the Obama administration,
which runs around the world apologizing for this country. He sees this country
the same way a Third World socialist dictator
does. That's the lens through which he sees the United States of America. And he
wants this country to be on trial, so he sends his attorney general out there,
claiming the attorney general made the decision after a long, agonizing moment,
after eight years of delay, and the Bush adminstration, yadda yadda yadda yadda
yadda. And can't even cite one example where it has been done before.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>America's
Truth Rejecter</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>CALLER: You did a story awhile back on
women that take the birth control pill. I don't because of the high risk of
breast cancer in my family. Now they want to take away my mammogram, but I want
you to know what kind of woman I am. I like a manly man. I've never taken the
pill in my life. Do you remember that story?</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: From the last time you called?</p>

<p>CALLER: No no no. The -- the birth control --</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Oh, you mean the news story. Oh yeah yeah yeah,
the birth -- not only birth control, but there are studies that say abortions
increase the chances of breast cancer as well.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>War on
the poor</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>CALLER: I heard you say something before
that just really annoyed me. You said something about unemployment and about
all these extensions for unemployment, that all these extensions are
discouraging people from looking for work. You have got to be kidding. You've
got to be kidding. What, do you think people are sitting back and, like, you
know, like, enjoying all this time off, when nobody has any idea of they're
going to be able to get a job? I mean, granted --</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Uh --</p>

<p>CALLER: -- wait, wait, let me finish, OK? Granted, my
particular industry is dead -- OK, it committed suicide. I understand that. But
my brother just got laid off two weeks ago, OK, and he -- and his -- in the
building he was in, Comcast laid off their entire work force in that -- in that
floor. </p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Yeah, and they're buying NBC.</p>

<p>CALLER: I don't give a damn. I mean, all I care about is,
like, where -- how am I going to get a job? How is he going to get a job? How
are we going to work, and I still have a mortgage to pay?</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Uh --</p>

<p>CALLER: I mean, come on, Rush, it hasn't been that long
since you got fi --</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Wait, can -- can I --</p>

<p>CALLER: Wait, wait, wait, wait, it hasn't been that long
since you got fired. Would you stop snickering? It's really -- it's really
pathetic.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I'm -- no -- I'm -- 'cause I feel like your
husband; I'm trying to get a word in edgewise, and you won't --</p>

<p>CALLER: My husband --</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: You won't --</p>

<p>CALLER: My husband died.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: You won't let me speak.</p>

<p>CALLER: Look, I didn't-- you know, you have --</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I'm sorry about that, I'm sorry --</p>

<p>CALLER: Look, you've got -- you've got more money than God,
OK? Are you starting a newspaper? No, of course not, ok, it's like everybody --</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Why would I invest in a dying industry?</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author>Z.P.</author>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911190044</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:01:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh Discusses Mammograms To Fearmonger About Gov't Rationing Of Health  Care</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911180049</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p><strong>By Christine Schwen</strong></p>

<p>Rush opened
today's show Drudge-style, giving us his own Rush Report of headlines that
prove how bad the economy is, and that "cannot be spun." Not to worry though,
he did make time for a quick sexist joke at Sen. McCaskill's expense. </p>

<p>The first
headline was the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB125850693443052993.html">story</a> claiming that the climate bill is going to be delayed
until spring, and took the opportunity to turn
McCaskill's take on the difficulties of passing cap-and-trade
legislation into a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911180023">sophomoric attempt</a>
at a joke: </p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: And a quick look at some headlines here.
"Senate to put off climate bill until spring." Claire McCaskill, Democrat senator, Missouri: "It's really big, really,
really hard. And it's gonna make a lot of people mad." That's what I'm
wondering. Is she talking about the climate
bill there or what -- "It's really big, really, really hard, and it's gonna make a lot of people
mad."</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Then he
moved on to the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fhostednews%2Fap%2Farticle%2FALeqM5imh0om2aCsj0s7UKXf-V4mP4rrjwD9C1T9O80">news</a>
that Obama said that creating jobs isn't the goal of the jobs summit, but
instead finding ways to encourage businesses to hire. Rush claimed that this is actually a
reason to hammer businesses and for Obama to save face, and to make up jobs.
Rush was incensed the house would <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fthecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F11%2F17%2Fhouse-to-turn-up-the-heat-on-jobs%2F%3Fscp%3D1%26sq%3Ddemocrats%2520panic%26st%3Dcse">propose</a>
another stimulus, and that Obama would propose a tax credit for every new job
created. Rush, whose thoughts on government
jobs are well <a href="http://mediamatters.org/columns/200910300038">documented</a>,
now apparently wants Obama to cover the cost of hiring new workers. </p>

<p>Always one
to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200903060032">worry about the less
fortunate</a>, Rush decided to have his own
jobs summit on December 3, which will counter Obama's jobs summit that "isn't
about creating jobs." During his summit, Rush wants to hear from people who
want jobs and those who don't -- because Rush
informed us that the pool of unemployed includes both. </p>

<p>The next <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2Fstories%2F1109%2F29646.html">story</a> on the Rush
Report read, "Dems alarmed as independents
bolt." Rush's interest in this story was self
evident. Similarly Rush directed us to a Chris
Cillizza <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fvoices.washingtonpost.com%2Fthefix%2Fmost-important-number%2Fthe-most-important-number-in-p-67.html">item</a> about how a majority of independents approve
of the job Obama is doing on only one issue area.</p>

<p>The final
stories in the Rush Report included Obama <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticle%2FnewsOne%2FidUSTRE5AH1RY20091118">warning</a>
of the possibility of a double dip recession (which Rush used to talk about the
"Chicoms laying into Obama" <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911170016">again</a>),
Rep. David Obey <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politicsdaily.com%2F2009%2F11%2F17%2Fdavid-obey-slams-obama-administration-for-errors-in-reporting-st%2F">criticizing</a>
the administration over the errors in the Recovery.gov jobs data (which was so interesting Rush went back to it twice), the news that
Geitner <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.weeklystandard.com%2Fweblogs%2FTWSFP%2F2009%2F11%2Fpost_155.asp">overpaid</a>
to bail out AIG, an
article claiming that "if the recession is
over, you can't tell from the trucking industry," and one of Rush's favorites
from <a href="http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/2009/11/17#0034">yesterday</a>,
the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.latimes.com%2Ffeatures%2Fhealth%2Fla-na-health-evidence18-2009nov18%2C0%2C3113676.story">news</a>
that guidelines for regular mammograms are changing. Today, Rush not only
referred to this as "rationing" but also <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911180024">said</a> "you might
even say we got death panels going on here."</p>

<p>Then Rush
read from a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lvrj.com%2Fnews%2Fbiden-finds-rank-has-its-privileges-70353947.html">story</a>
about Vice President Joe Biden wanting to play
golf at a members-only golf club. Rush, who's
very concerned about <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badgolfer.com%2Fdepartments%2Ffeatures%2Frush-limbaugh-radio-king-golf-2124.htm">golf
etiquette</a>, was upset that "Plugs Biden" did this and it was not covered
more thoroughly.</p>

<p>And the last
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fmoney.cnn.com%2F2009%2F11%2F18%2Fnews%2Feconomy%2Foil.prices.fortune%2Findex.htm">story</a>
before moving on -- gas prices are going up
again. Rush has only one comment about this: "It's
called drill baby drill." </p>

<p>After the
break, El Rushbo, a self-proclaimed "a man who everybody would like to be" uses
this <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F11%2F19%2Fbusiness%2Feconomy%2F19econ.html%3F_r%3D2%26hp">story</a>
about the home building slump to argue that Obama wants people on welfare: </p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: But this is the documentation of
Barack Obama's failure -- failure for the United States.
To him, it's a success story; this is what is
maddening and infuriating. All of these items are a success story. He wants
this chaos. He wants people on welfare. He wants people dependent on
government.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Next Rush
took a call from a radiologist who complained about insurance companies
rationing (something we already <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200907240025">knew about</a>) and somehow blamed health care reform proposals. Rush
agreed. </p>
<h2><strong>Rush is
always right, and the Obama administration is always wrong</strong></h2>

<p>Hour two
began with Rush telling us how right he is
about everything: </p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: The views expressed on this program,
documented to be almost always right, 99.3 percent of the time. I don't think
anybody in media ever has had such an astronomically, unbelievably high
percentage of opinion accuracy, as my most recent accuracy audit from the
Sullivan Group in California.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>He devoted
the entire rest of the hour to the "comedy of errors," of Holder's decision to
try KSM his co-conspirators in New
  York City. Rush kicked it off by claiming that Obama
"poisoned the case" by saying he thinks KSM will be found guilty. </p>

<p>Rush then
aired a clip of Holder suggesting that a civilian trial will help restore our
image in the world. Rush was so insensed by this comment that he was forced to
stop the tape. "We do not have a rotten image in the world!" Rush spit out.
Apparently that was manufactured by the left and pushed by Obama.</p>

<p>Then he
read from Andrew McCarthy's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Farticle.nationalreview.com%2F%3Fq%3DNjJjYTIxNGFlZjRiNzFmYzFiM2ZhMGI4NTRmMWNhMzg">column</a>
arguing that trial lawyers caused the delay in justice. </p>

<p>Moving on
to the success of a civilian trial, Rush fear mongered about the possibility of
the detainees being let off. What rules are they going to use in this
courtroom, Rush asked. He asserted that if they're going to use "Miranda and
all the rest" of the justice system, then the case has to be thrown out.</p>

<p>Rush then
informed us that there are several judges who would love release the detainees,
like David Hamilton (Rush is actually a little
late to the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911110005">Hamilton</a>-<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911050030">bashing</a>
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911030023">party</a>):</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: There is a bit of conventional wisdom
evolving out there, and it is this; "Rush, Rush, Rush, don't worry about this.
There's no judge in the world that's gonna let these guys go. There's no judge
in the world that are gonna let these guys get off. And if that happens,
there's no appellate judge that's gonna let these guys get off." Oh, really? Now,
that seems to be conventional wisdom, 'cause no judge wants to become that kind
of a target. But, folks, they just confirmed
one of the most radical leftist judges in the history of this country
yesterday, guy named Hamilton.
You don't think there's some ACLU types that are judges
who would love to let these guys go, who think the Untied States is the guilty
party here? I'm not at all convinced that some judge -- the left is so
perverted, they got plenty of judges who would probably consider themselves
heroes to find the United States guilty here, as opposed to Khalid Shaikh Mohammed.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>In fact,
Rush added, he knows how much the left has peoples who "despise this country
and would love to acquit these guys and have it all blamed" on the United States.</p>

<p>Next, Rush
mocked Senator Durbin -- calling him "<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911180027">Senator
Turban</a>" -- for claiming that no one
complained about trying Moussaui in Virgina.
In fact, Rush claimed, it was the Moussaui trial
in that let Al Qaeda know who was on our radar. </p>

<p>In case
weren't already convinced that this trial is a bad idea, Rush informed us that
Holder should have actually recused himself from this decision because the law
firm he previously worked for has defended people who were held at Guantanamo
Bay, the same prison where KSM and the other co-conspirators are held. Rush is
shocked that no one is reporting this. </p>

<p>However,
Holder's errors aren't limited to trying KSM in a
civilian court, we learned. In fact,
Holder had the audacity to call the shooting at Fort Hood a tragedy, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911180028">which is incorrect</a>,
according to Rush. </p>

<p>Rush then
took a minute to complain that Senator "Lindsey Grahamnesty,"
voted to confirm Holder. </p>

<p>After the
break, Rush took a different tack. Despite his claim that the ACLU "originally" wanted to take
down the legal system, Rush is also deeply concerned about the affect this case
will have on our civil liberties about our civil liberties so much. You see, if
KSM can be convicted without having been given Miranda rights, then Americans
could be convicted without having been Mirandized. </p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Let me go to an extreme. If the president of the United States can tell the world
that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed was tortured, was -- and then did not get Mirandized and was
convicted, does that mean that the rest of us can then be waterboarded? If
we're gonna convict anybody, despite being waterboarded, and they got their
confession after that waterboarding, then is torture -- as they define it --
now permitted by officials? Even though these
are military people that did it, this is why this doesn't belong anywhere near
a U.S.
civilian court. Ladies and gentlemen, habeas corpus rights, the same thing.
Can't they then be denied to us under the future under the precedent that's
gonna be set here? </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush was
also very concerned that, since Obama has said that KSM will be convicted, the
trial will be seen as being rigged. Rush was really just worried about our
standing in the world, because unlike Obama, Rush knows that our standing is
currently fine, but could be adversely affected by this trial.</p>

<p>He then
moved on to President Clinton. According to Rush, Clinton never paid a dime's worth of interest in terrorism because he never
took on tough issues. He never did anything about the 1993 World Trade
 Center attacks, or any
other international terrorism. I'm sure Richard Clarke and the members of the
Bush administration who <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.time.com%2Ftime%2Fcovers%2F1101020812%2Fstory4.html">reportedly</a>
felt that Clinton
was "obsessed with terrorism" were just mistaken. </p>
<h2><strong>Rush is
just really, really, really concerned that women get their mammograms </strong></h2>

<p>At the top
of the third hour, Rush takes a call from an unemployed dittohead who is very
worried about his job prospects. Fortunately, Rush is sending him a massager to
elevate his stress about his job situation. With those common sense solutions,
we at the Wire cannot wait until his job summit. </p>

<p>Speaking of
common sense solutions, Rush reported that Palin's appearance on Oprah had the
highest ratings for that show in two years. And, Rush added, no one even cried.
</p>

<p>Moving on,
Rush reported that Obama <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fhostednews%2Fap%2Farticle%2FALeqM5hvvEaRmS-dP-TpHe3x3l64IpTVdQD9C1TBI81">will
not make</a> the January deadline he imposed for closing "Club Gitmo," and that
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2009%2FPOLITICS%2F11%2F18%2Fabortion.poll%2Findex.html">according</a>
to CNN, six in ten Americans do not favor providing federal funds for
abortions. Rush announced that this was a problem for Democrats, because the
Senate can't pass health care reform with the Stupak amendment or without it.
Apparently the Senate is going to use reconciliation to "Chicago" their way out of the problem.</p>

<p>Rush then
read an article that detailed the history of populist outrage against "fat cats." Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200907230048">selflessly</a> cautioned
against continuing that trend, asking if our lives will better if a "fat cat" gets his salary cut. Rush didn't think this was a
good idea, because it didn't work in the 1930s when Rush claimed the New Deal
was destroying everything. If Rush needs a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200812030014?f=s_search">history</a> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200901050007">lesson</a>, we're happy to
oblige. </p>

<p>Done with
the economy and terrorism, Rush most of the the rest of the show talking about
his new cause, mammograms. He took a call from a woman who suggested that the
new mammogram guidelines are a form of discrimination against women. Rush
wholeheartedly agreed, and repeated the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/2009/11/17#0034">now-familiar</a> charge that it's a form of rationing. </p>

<p>Rush then
reminded us that he actually spoke out in favor of mammograms in <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rushlimbaugh.com%2Fhome%2Fdaily%2Fsite_102109%2Fcontent%2F01125114.member.html">October</a>
(subscription required) and Snerdly thought that the government changed the
guidelines because Rush got 'millions' of women to get mammograms. Rush agreed
an humbly noted that he saved millions of women's lives. All in a day's work
for El Rushbo. </p>

<p>Rush's next
caller suggested that the government moved the recommended age for regular
mammograms back in an effort to totally deny mammogram screenings to older
woman. This made rush furious that an American woman who is "not a nutcase"
would doubt her government so much. We <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200904270036">can't</a> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200910200042">imagine</a> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200908270012">why</a> a regular listener
would feel that way. </p>

<p>Rush then
took a break from mammagrams in order remind his listeners that <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.colbertnation.com%2Fthe-colbert-report-videos%2F231610%2Fjune-22-2009%2Fzicam-recall">everyone
should be taking Zicam.</a> </p>

<p>In addition
to wanting us to buy Zicam, Rush suggested that we all subscribe to the
Heritage Foundation, because they have those "common sense conservative
solutions" we've been hearing so much about. Rush mentioned that the money we
pay Heritage would be cheaper than college. </p>

<p>Rush
finished the show talking about -- you guessed
it -- mammograms. </p>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow and Zachary Pleat contributed to
this edition of the Limbaugh Wire.</em></p>
<h2><strong>Highlights
</strong></h2>

<p><strong>Outrageous
comments</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: He's exactly right, and we've all predicted
this. There's no question that this is what's
gonna happen, and this is a little leading indicator. And you might even say we
got death panels going on here.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: But this is the documentation of Barack Obama's
failure -- failure for the United States. To him, it's a
success story; this is what is maddening and
infuriating. All of these items are a success story. He wants this chaos. He
wants people on welfare. He wants people dependent on government.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: The district judge in the Moussaoui trial actually
tried to dismiss the indictment. People may have forgotten that, but I haven't, and that's why I'm not convinced at all that the
judge in this trial is going to bend over backwards to make sure these guys
don't get off. I know the left. I know how much
they have people who despise this country and would love to acquit these guys
and have it all blamed on the corrupt, unjust, immoral systems of intelligence
gathering, torturous punishment and so forth, that has become the United States
of America.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>Ego on
loan from Narcissus</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Yeah, I'm going to get to the Holder stuff
in just a second. I'm still compiling things on
it because his testimony's ongoing. They're in a break now, and I'm -- even
while executive broadcast excellence flawlessly, still continuing to do show
prep because I, El Rushbo, a man who everybody would like to be, can multitask.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: The views expressed on this program, documented to
be almost always right, 99.3 percent of the time. I don't think anybody in
media ever has had such an astronomically, unbelievably high percentage of
opinion accuracy, as my most recent accuracy audit from the Sullivan Group in California.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author>C.S.</author>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911180049</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:09:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Serving Sarah: Rush Hosts Palin To Push Falsehoods On Economy, Health Care, And Global Warming</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911170034</link>
<description><![CDATA[<h2>Where have
all the non-chickified cowboys gone?</h2>

<p>By Chrissy
Schwen </p>

<p>Rush kicked
off today's show grinning from ear to ear
because <em>Der Spiegel</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spiegel.de%2Finternational%2Fworld%2F0%2C1518%2C661678%2C00.html">community members.</a></p>

<p>After the
break, Rush briefly called Vice President Joe Biden a nitwit, then turned to the issue of
mammograms. Rush decided that the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.abcnews.com%2Ftheworldnewser%2F2009%2F11%2Fclems-chronicles-breast-cancer-screening-controversypresident-obama-in-chinahasan-investigation.html" target="_blank">new guidelines</a> suggesting women wait until 50 to get yearly
mammograms means "this is the beginning of rationed care," one of his <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200909100036" target="_blank">favorite
topics</a>. Rush did not mention -- as the
article did -- that for women 40-49, the damage
from a false-positive mammogram can outweigh the benefit of early discovery. </p>

<p>Rush then
heard from a caller who's astounded that the media fact-checked Palin's book
but not the story about Recovery.gov citing jobs created in fake districts.
Rush replied this is because much of the news is made up.</p>
<h2>This
interview brought to you by "common sense conservative principles" </h2>

<p>Hour two
began with his interview of Sarah Palin, in which Palin offered "dittos from Alaska":</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: We are going to open this hour with a rare
personal interview, a rare guest -- doesn't
happen much on this program -- but we are happy to have with us former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, whose book, <em>Going Rogue</em>, hits the shelves today, and it's already headed for, I think, a record in
sales. </p>

<p>Governor Palin, thanks for making time; it's great to talk to you. We spoke last Thursday
in an interview for the Limbaugh Letter, but it's great to have you here on the
radio.</p>

<p>PALIN: Hey, thank you so much, and dittos from an Alaskan.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>With the
pleasantries out of the way, Rush and Palin embarked on a discussion of the
economy, with Palin decrying its current state. She added that the "common-sense
conservative principles" (which seemed to be the secret phrase of the day) of
cutting taxes, creating jobs, and cutting the deficit "aren't even being
discussed." Instead,
she suggested we all act more like Reagan did
in the '80s, who she <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911170028" target="_blank">falsely
claimed</a> faced a worse recession, with "common-sense
conservative principles."</p>

<p>Moving on
to the special election in New York-23, Palin
stated that she was excited and encouraged by Doug Hoffman's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fclearly%2520in%2520need%2520of%2520updating%2520his%2520pop-culture%2520references%2F" target="_blank">performance</a>, because it showed that "common-sense conservative principles" can truly <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wivb.com%2Fdpp%2Fnews%2Fpolitics%2FFirst_democrat_win_in_16_years_in_N_NY_20091104" target="_blank">make a difference</a> in an election like this. Palin clarified
that she doesn't believe Hoffman's "success" means that America is
ready for a third party, but that independents
will naturally gravitate toward the Republican Party's platform of "common-sense
conservative principles" and its "common-sense
conservative solutions." Noticing a theme yet?
After all, Palin added, "who wouldn't want" to
join the Republican Party? </p>

<p>After a
quick break, Rush and Palin got into her book. Surprising no one, Palin
informed Rush that she was not trying to reach the "media elite" with her book,
but instead common-sense Americans (who
presumably have common-sense conservative
principles). She added that she hopes those people will learn something from
her book. Hopefully, they won't learn any <a href="http://mediamatters.org/topic/bookwatch/" target="_blank">Rogue facts</a>.</p>

<p>Then Palin
declared that she thinks climate change involves a lot of "snake oil science,"
and she doesn't attribute it to any manmade activities. On a related topic, she
also didn't understand why we don't tap into our domestic oil reserves. </p>

<p>On health
care reform, Palin announced that the reform proposal in Congress amounts to a
"<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200910280023" target="_blank">government takeover of health care</a>," and decided
that instead we need "common-sense conservative
solutions." </p>

<p>Palin then
gave her common-sense conservative solutions to
America's
foreign policy problems as an ode to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dlj3iNxZ8Dww" target="_blank">Ms. Teen
South Carolina</a>:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>PALIN: Well, I think,
domestically, a threat that we're facing right
now is the dithering and hesitation in sending
a message to the terrorists that we're gonna claim what Ronald Reagan claimed -- "Our motto's gonna be, we win, you lose." The way
that we do that is allow McChrystal to have the reinforcements that he's asking
for in Afghanistan. That sends that message to the
terrorists over there that, now, we're going to
end this thing with our victory. </p>

<p>We need to start facing Iran with tougher and tougher
sanctions that need to be considered. We need to work with our allies and with the Iranian issues like Britain and France and not allow access to
favorable international monetary bills. That's a great threat that I think
would kind of shake up Ahmadinejad and get him
to listen. </p>

<p>We need to look at halting Iran's imports of refined petroleum
products -- they're quite reliant on imported
gasoline. And
we need to use that hammer to wake up the leadership there, too.</p>

<p>Those are two big challenges
that we have right now. Domestically, and in naming those two countries, Afghanistan and Iran -- two big challenges there, too.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>After the
break, Rush summarized the interview, saying:
"I think we know what her rallying cry's going to be." Indeed. He added that he
likes Palin because:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: You know, one thing, I've read her book -- she's
not a navel gazer. I think that's one of the reasons I said yesterday that the
intellectuals don't understand her, don't like her. She doesn't analyze
herself. She doesn't analyze her thoughts; she just has them and expresses them.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush and a
caller then agreed that Palin is great, that
Obama is on an apology tour in China, and that
he's a national embarrassment. The two next callers also said they believed
that Palin should be president. </p>

<p>Rush's last
caller before the break said he liked Palin, but thought
that men are better leaders. Rush disagreed,
but blamed feminism --
apparently, those feminists should have known
their actions for equal rights would have caused a backlash like this. This brought Rush back to the "wimpification of men."</p>

<p>The third
hour of the show began with a segment of meta
radio, in which Rush played a clip of MSNBC
playing a clip of Rush's show. Rush was
disappointed with MSNBC's conclusion that Palin does not favor an inclusive
Republican Party. He
stated that the Republican Party is more diverse, and that in the Democratic
Party, you can't be pro-life or for tax cuts.
I'm sure <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.house.gov%2Fstupak%2F" target="_blank">Congressman
Stupak</a> and <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911090045" target="_blank">President Obama</a> would disagree.</p>

<p>Rush also
disapproved of the media's criticism of Palin's book. Rush informed us that
Palin's book is not all about the campaign, and that she was only setting the
record straight:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: All I can say is read the book. It's about 10 to 12 pages on
the campaign, and after you finish it, you will not think that she's selling
anyone out; she is setting the record straight.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: The truth of the matter is that many people in the
McCain campaign set her up and they would not let her be who she is. And she writes about it, and it's just a -- it's, I
don't know, you can read it for yourself. It's
a set-the-record-straight sort of memoir, if you will.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>However, he
did downgrade the book from "<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911130014" target="_blank">one of the most substantive policy books</a>" he's read to a
book with "some substantive policy stuff."</p>

<p>After a
quick break, Rush discussed <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fhostednews%2Fap%2Farticle%2FALeqM5jLuiHkZh_6jawpShuW9JXGMuMZ1gD9C0RPT81" target="_blank">a poll</a> that found that Americans are concerned about the
costs of health care reform, and that while the poll found broad support for
reform, opinions shifted when people were asked about tradeoffs. Rush
speculated that this is why people must vote for Democratic candidates, because
they're ignorant of the specifics of the issues.</p>

<p>Rush then
took a call from a "former feminazi" who informed Rush she wanted to "steal
away" with him. It is as uncomfortable as it
sounds. Rush's famous ego then appeared:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Now, I have to know because our resident sexist
here, Bo Snerdley, wants me to know what it was that switched you from becoming
a feminazi to being who you are today.</p>

<p>CALLER: OK. Well, that's a really -- that's a real long
story. But, first, I'd have to say God --</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Well, just remember this -- </p>

<p>CALLER: It is -- it's God.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: -- just remember: brevity.</p>

<p>CALLER: It was God, but it was a lot of people in my life,
and, you know, I just want to -- I want to say that it was a friend of mine, a
radiologist whose name is Terry Kobeck, and he would walk around listening to
you in the office. I worked for --</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: So it was me. That's what we're getting at. It was
me.</p>

<p>CALLER: It was.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: It was me and God.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Then Rush
and his "feminazi" went on to ask <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mtv.com%2Fvideos%2Fpaula-cole%2F47189%2Fwhere-have-all-the-cowboys-gone.jhtml" target="_blank">where all the cowboys have gone</a> (back to the
"chickification of men"). After the call, Rush -- clearly needing to update his Netflix queue --
added that the only cowboy Democrats are "<a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.brokebackmountain.com%2F" target="_blank">brokeback cowboys</a>." </p>

<p>Rush
wrapped up the show asking why more women don't want cowboys, and why women
love <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amctv.com%2Foriginals%2Fmadmen%2Fcast%2Fddraper" target="_blank">Don Draper</a>, even though he treats them badly. No one tell
him that Draper isn't real; it'll just make him cry. </p>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow, Zachary Pleat, and Tom Allison
contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh Wire.</em></p>
<h2>Highlights </h2>

<p><strong>Outrageous comments</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: But the point is, as long as the pollsters report that Obama
is personally liked, that intimidates members of Congress into opposing his
agenda. Because Obama is universally liked -- oh, they really enjoy him; he's
personal; he's smart; he speaks well. And even though people hate his issues
and his agenda, they like him personally. </p>

<p>Well, my theory on that is that these approval numbers are
skewed high, perhaps not artificially by the pollsters twisting things --
although they do do that with samples -- but I think the old, ugly, racist head
has -- raises itself here. I think when a pollster calls somebody and says,
"What do you think about President Obama?" I think people are afraid to say
anything negative, because he's our first black president, and especially if
the poll is done in person.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: So we've got imaginary districts. Can you imagine how
ACORN's gonna have an orgasm over this? Good God, when you can go in and make
up an entire congressional district and then ballot stuff from a district that doesn't exist,
except that it does on an Obama website? Whoa.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>Ego on loan from Narcissus</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Now, I have to know because our
resident sexist here, Bo Snerdley, wants me to know what it was that switched
you from becoming a feminazi to being who you are today.</p>

<p>CALLER: OK. Well, that's a really -- that's a real long
story. But, first, I'd have to say God --</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Well, just remember this -- </p>

<p>CALLER: It is -- it's God.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: -- just remember: brevity.</p>

<p>CALLER: It was God, but it was a lot of people in my life,
and, you know, I just want to -- I want to say that it was a friend of mine, a
radiologist whose name is Terry Kobeck, and he would walk around listening to
you in the office. I worked for --</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: So it was me. That's what we're getting at. It was
me.</p>

<p>CALLER: It was.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: It was me and God.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>Ladies' man</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: What's happening in this
country, Mr. President, is that the men of this country are becoming
chickified. The huffing and puffington post has a new section on that website
where they explore why women are unhappy. It is a daily thing -- daily posts --
trying to explain why women are unhappy. </p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>CALLER: Oh my gosh, Rush Limbaugh -- former feminazi dittos.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Former feminazi?</p>

<p>CALLER: Former feminazi dittos. Oh my gosh, oh my gosh, I
just want to say, there's -- if I could steal away with you, Rush Limbaugh,
there's so many things I wish I could talk to you about. But I just wanna say
that I agree with you that I believe possibly that the left does hate Sarah
Palin maybe more than you.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Let me ask you a question out there, Laurie. </p>

<p>CALLER: Yes.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Just to -- in my narcissistic mode here, a little
question: If you did steal away with me --</p>

<p>CALLER: Yes.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: -- would I get a word in? Would you -- is your
desire to just tell me what you think? </p>

<p>CALLER: No. No. It would take hours and hours and hours. No.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: OK. I just -- 'cause you said there's so many
things you wanted to talk to me about, and I just envision myself sitting there
listening.</p>

<p>CALLER: Oh, yes. Yes, yes, yes.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911170034</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:16:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh Defends  Sarah Palin, Attacks David Brooks</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911160050</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p><strong>By Tom Allison</strong></p>

<p>Rush kicked off today's show with a 
little fearmongering, claiming that there was a serious possibility that 
Guant&aacute;namo Bay detainees would be 
acquitted in their criminal cases. Rush played some audio from Attorney General 
Eric Holder, where he commented 
that he informed President Obama of the decision to bring the detainees to 
criminal trial. 
Then Limbaugh 
claimed that Holder was "a stranger to the truth" and was very skeptical that 
Obama wasn't fully behind the decision to bring the five detainees to New York. 
Claiming that the decision could be Obama's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911040035">most recent</a> 
Waterloo, Rush claimed that Obama was degrading our national security and was 
endangering his chances at re-election: </p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Folks, this could very well be Waterloo 
for Obama. He has stepped in it with this Khalid Shaikh Mohammed matter. All the frenzied writing and protests -- I mean, that's just the beginning. 
But what's happening here -- this is an in-our-face weakening of our security, which means 
that if a civilian target is hit again, particularly New York City, Obama is 
toast. He's done. The American 
people will tolerate a lot, but not a grotesque mishandling of security based on a contempt for your own 
country. 
</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush also played Liz Cheney's 
comments from <em>Fox News Sunday</em> 
criticizing the decision to bring detainees to New York. Rush again said he 
didn't buy Holder's claim that he only consulted with Obama, asserting that 
Obama is "in charge" of the Justice Department.</p>

<p>After the break, Rush turned to AP's fact 
check of Sarah Palin's memoir <em>Going 
Rogue</em>. Rush read basically word for word from this Powerline blog <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.powerlineblog.com%2Farchives%2F2009%2F11%2F024946.php">post</a> that 
critiques the AP fact check. Limbaugh couldn't believe that the AP would 
dedicate 11 
"crackerjack" reporters to the article. Smelling a double standard, Rush asked, 
"do any other authors get fact checked like this? Not that I can recall." Rush 
later dared the AP to fact-check Al Gore's most recent 
publications.</p>
<h2>Rush: David Brooks "sounds angry" 
and "jealous" of Palin</h2>

<p>Echoing the rest of the conservative 
echo chamber, Rush criticized Obama for purportedly bowing to the emperor of Japan. Once again 
following Glenn Beck's lead, Limbaugh cited a 1994 <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F1994%2F06%2F19%2Fweekinreview%2Fthe-world-the-president-s-inclination-no-it-wasn-t-a-bow-bow.html">article</a> 
that analyzed President Clinton's alleged bow. Limbaugh also <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911160030">joked</a> that 
Obama bows because he's envious of monarchies and would like to be bowed to 
someday.</p>

<p>As more 
evidence that Limbaugh will take any story and use it to criticize the Obama 
administration or progressives in general, Rush read from a <em>Washington Post </em><a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2009%2F11%2F16%2FAR2009111601598.html">story</a> 
on hunger, unhappy with the article's reporting on Obama's plans to combat food 
scarcity. </p>

<p>Rush then played a montage of media 
reporting on Limbaugh's comment that <em>Going 
Rogue</em> was the most substantive policy book he's ever read, as first 
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911130014">documented</a> here at <em>Media Matters</em>. Rush explained that Palin 
"doesn't think about her own thinking," unlike a lot of liberal scholars, and 
therein lies her genius.</p>

<p>After playing David Brooks' comments 
over the weekend that the country has a lot of serious problems and the idea 
that Palin is setting up a presidential run with this book is a "joke," Rush inexplicably claimed 
that Brooks has Rush on his brain, and added a few <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911160035">personal insults</a> to Brooks 
as well: 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: This guy has got thin 
skin. He can't take it. He 
literally can't take it. He's taking everything she's saying personally, and he 
is amplifying her meaning and taking it as a personal insult. </p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Rush calls cap and trade "a vehicle 
for world government"</h2>

<p>Rush then promoted a Rassmussen <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rasmussenreports.com%2Fpublic_content%2Fpolitics%2Fgeneral_politics%2Fnovember_2009%2F59_of_gop_voters_say_palin_shares_their_values">poll</a> 
that found that 59 
percent of GOP voters say Palin shares their values but did not 
mention that "[l]ast month, Rasmussen Reports found <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rasmussenreports.com%2Fpublic_content%2Fpolitics%2Felections2%2Felection_2012%2Fgop_2012_huckabee_29_romney_24_palin_18">Palin in third place</a> among possible contenders for the 2012 
Republican presidential nomination."</p>

<p>Limbaugh read from an Associated 
Press <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.denverpost.com%2Fbreakingnews%2Fci_13794389">article</a> headlined 
"Obama retreats on climate change," which proved to be the perfect 
jumping-off point to 
criticize progressives for purportedly fearmongering over climate change. 
Rush claimed that the seas weren't rising and <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fclips.mediamatters.org%2Fresearch%2F200903300035">falsely claimed</a> 
that the "Earth is actually cooling."</p>

<p>Limbaugh then shifted into high 
gear, claiming that health 
care reform and climate change legislation is merely a "vehicle 
for world government."</p>

<p>A caller told Rush that she thought 
Obama was a 
coward for delaying the decision to send troops to Afghanistan. Rush replied 
that that might be the case, but thought that the term "deceitful" was more 
accurate. Responding to the caller's concern about the future of the country, 
Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911160039">said</a>, "You 
get up every day and you feel like you go to war with this 
administration."</p>

<p>Rush called it "very clever" that 
<em>Going Rogue</em> doesn't have an index 
because it would enrage the Washington, D.C., crowd, presumably because it would make it 
more difficult to criticize.</p>

<p>After a caller expressed her concern 
that Palin would be victimized by the media if she were the Republicans' only chance in 2012, Rush 
claimed that "we beat the media all the time."</p>

<p>Clearly reserving his most 
incendiary comments for discussions with callers, Rush told a caller that the 
country is "under attack internally": 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: So, the second option, I could've said, "Jason -- or Jordan, we're in trouble. I don't know 
if we can save the country. I have never seen it under attack internally this 
way. I have never seen this in my life. I have never -- I never dreamed in my lifetime 
we would have a president who dislikes this country as much as he does and holds 
as much of it in contempt as much as 
he does. I would have never dreamed that we would have had a president who is doing 
everything he can to destroy the very engine that creates prosperity and freedom in this country, the 
American private sector and capitalism." </p>
</blockquote>
<h2>"I'm a talk show host. Am I not 
running the party?"</h2>

<p>Rush returned to David Brooks' 
comments on ABC's <em>This Week </em>and 
complained about the media's reactions to and analysis of his dismissal of Palin. 
After pointing out that Palin doesn't actually have a talk show, Rush suggested 
the media were 
contradicting themselves by calling him (a talk show host) a 
political figure but degrading Palin by calling <em>her </em>a talk show host. </p>

<p>Again echoing Glenn Beck, Rush 
brought up a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Fearth%2Fenvironment%2Fcarbon%2F6527970%2FEveryone-in-Britain-could-be-given-a-personal-carbon-allowance.html">proposal</a> 
in Britain, in its most nascent stages, for a carbon allowance program. Beck <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911130008">talked</a> about this on 
Friday, suggesting to his 
audience that they read "the last part of the Bible" to answer where we're 
going as a country. </p>

<p>Wrapping up the program, Rush 
repeated the theory that has saturated conservative spheres as of late, that the 
Guant&aacute;namo criminal 
court cases was just an excuse to prosecute former Bush administration officials. 
</p>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow 
and Zachary Pleat contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh 
Wire.</em></p>
<h2>Highlights</h2>
<blockquote>

<p> 
LIMBAUGH: Folks, this could very well be Waterloo 
for Obama. He has stepped in it with this Khalid Shaikh Mohammed matter. All the frenzied writing and protests -- I mean, that's just the beginning. 
But what's happening here -- this is an in-our-face weakening of our security, which means 
that if a civilian target is hit again, particularly New York City, Obama is 
toast. He's done. The American 
people will tolerate a lot, but not a grotesque mishandling of security based on a contempt for your own 
country.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: David Brooks, "Looks like 
it's a fair amount of score-settling." It -- they're -- folks, I told her this in the 
interview last week, and I mentioned this to you on Friday when I told you what 
I told her, that people are gonna focus on the score-settling. And the score-settling is not score-settling per se, it's setting the record 
straight. And it's by no where anywhere near the majority of the book. It's a few short pages compared to the 
415.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: This guy has got thin 
skin. He can't take it. He 
literally can't take it. He's taking everything she's saying personally, and he 
is amplifying her meaning and taking it as a personal insult. </p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: So, the second option, I could've said, "Jason -- or Jordan, we're in trouble. I don't know 
if we can save the country. I have never seen it under attack internally this 
way. I have never seen this in my life. I have never -- I never dreamed in my lifetime 
we would have a president who dislikes this country as much as he does and holds 
as much of it in contempt as much as 
he does. I would have never dreamed that we would have had a president who is doing 
everything he can to destroy the very engine that creates prosperity and freedom in this country, the 
American private sector and capitalism." </p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author>T.A.</author>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911160050</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:07:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh Suggests  Trial Of '93 World Trade Center Bombers Contributed To 9-11</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911130030</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p><strong>By 
Zachary Pleat</strong></p>
<h2>Rush: Putting terrorists on trial is 
"a disgusting travesty"</h2>

<p><a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911120021">"Chickenhawk" Rush</a> wasted no time 
savaging the decision to bring Khalid Shaikh Mohammed to America for trial, 
saying, "This is more 
insidious than you can possibly imagine. I'm talking about bringing these 
terrorists up from Gitmo and trying them in New York City." Rush went on, 
calling the idea of putting terrorists on trial a "disgusting travesty" and then 
complaining that Obama 
is always out of the country when bad news hits and that he is pushing the responsibility for 
this off to Attorney General Eric Holder, a claim he repeated later in his show. 
Later on, Rush claimed that federal judges from "the American left" would be 
only too happy to let 
terrorists go free. Rush's obsession with a possible acquittal became a running 
theme throughout his show.</p>

<p>Next, Rush surprised us with quite a 
treat: He will have 
former Alaska governor and former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin live on 
his show next Tuesday, to coincide with her book release, which Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911130014">proclaimed to be</a> "one of the most 
substantive policy books" he has read. He also announced that his interview with 
Palin will be the cover story of his new <em>Limbaugh Letter</em>. During this segment, Rush 
repeated the party line that Sarah Palin was kept bottled up by the McCain 
campaign. Rush also took the opportunity to defend her disastrous interview with 
Katie Couric. Later in his show, Rush ranted about journalists in Washington 
being disconnected from real people for not recognizing the crowds that Sarah Palin and 
other conservatives draw on their book tours and rallies, and launched into his 
typical revisionism about the 2008 election, creating a straw man to stand in 
for Obama and lamenting that the GOP "had the wrong 
candidate."</p>

<p>Once he finished teasing us with the 
promise of listening to both him and Palin at the same time next week, Rush read 
in full <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fcorner.nationalreview.com%2Fpost%2F%3Fq%3DNTVkN2ZhMTU0NzcwYWVmYTNmODI1ZTJjMTA1ZDFiODQ">a NRO Corner blog post by Andrew 
McCarthy</a>, praising him as the "best source" for this kind of 
legal and national security analysis. </p>
<h2>Rush: Terrorist trials will "destroy 
the CIA"</h2>

<p>Rush then took it upon himself to defend the Central 
Intelligence Agency, decrying any investigations into the CIA as "banana 
republic-type stuff" 
and "Marxist-type stuff." Finishing up the NRO article, Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911130015">declared</a> that America will be put on 
trial, and that it will be a soapbox for Al Qaeda. Rush finished this off by 
declaring that this trial would destroy the CIA, a charge he repeated several 
times throughout his show.</p>

<p>Later on, Rush amazingly <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911130017">claimed</a> that putting the terrorists 
who bombed the World Trade Center in 1993 led to the 9-11 attacks, a remark he 
repeated later on: 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Try this. There have been 
all kinds of people on television today being asked, "Bringing them into New 
York, doesn't that make New York a bigger terrorist target?" Hey. And they all 
say, "Well, no, no. New York's always a terrorist target. Look at '93. We tried 
those guys in 1993, and nothing happened." What do you mean, "Nothing happened"? 
You ever heard of 9-11? We tried these guys and convicted the blind sheikh in 
1993 and nothing happened except 9-11. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Never one to be afraid of attacking 
just about anyone, Rush blamed the FBI investigation of alleged Fort Hood 
shooter Nidal Malik 
Hasan for treating him as a potential criminal instead of a 
potential terrorist. Incidentally, the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fbi.gov%2Fterrorinfo%2Fcounterrorism%2Fwaronterrorhome.htm">FBI plays a major role in terrorist 
investigations</a>. Rush then <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911130018">attacked</a> congressman and retired admiral Joe Sestak as "a dangerous, 
left-wing, radical 
ideologue" for his views on putting terrorists on trial.</p>
<h2>Rush: "[T]his poor guy 
McChrystal ... has to 
sit there and listen to a community organizer"</h2>

<p>Rush started off his second hour by 
continuing his incredulousness over putting Gitmo detainees on trial in federal 
court, claiming that the Zacarias Moussaoui trial was a circus because "supposed 9-11 
families" asked for leniency for him. </p>

<p>Next, Rush played a clip of Obama 
answering a question about his decision on Afghanistan and summed it up as "a 
bunch of psychobabble." 
Seemingly unaware that our system of constitutional government places the 
military under civilian control, Rush lamented: </p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Can you imagine this poor 
guy [Gen. Stanley] McChrystal? Here's this four-star general, and he has to sit 
there and listen to this community organizer, who wouldn't know the butt end of 
an AK-47 if he saw it, tell him how to run a war. And then he's got to sit there 
and put up with a really strategically timed statement from our ambassador, 
appointed by Obama, in Kabul. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Next, Rush repeated an earlier 
complaint that Obama didn't declare that dropping atomic bombs on Japan was the 
right thing to do, accusing him of ducking the question. Rush then claimed Obama 
wouldn't answer because he couldn't say what he wanted to say: "my country was 
wrong." Rush later expanded on this, declaring that Rev. Jeremiah Wright was 
obsessed with the atomic bombing of Japan, and as Rush said today and says 
nearly every week, "Jeremiah Wright is Obama."</p>

<p>After saying that Obama's visit to 
Elmendorf Air Force Base in Alaska was nothing but a campaign Q&amp;A session 
and a chance to bash former President Bush, Rush took a caller who pleaded with 
him to continue his support for the troops. Rush used this opportunity to yet 
again accuse Obama of dithering on Afghanistan. Rush then talked about how he 
feels empathy for military families and again accused Obama of not caring about 
victory.</p>

<p>Next, Rush read <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2Fstories%2F1109%2F29471.html">a <em title="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29471.html">Politico</em> story</a> 
highlighting a decision Obama will announce in next year's State of the Union 
speech to tackle deficits, and asked "what moron will believe" that Obama would 
"turn into a deficit hawk." Rush treated us to his wonderful political 
analysis after finishing the article, saying Obama is speaking like this because 
he's losing the independents. Later on, Rush warned people not to believe anyone 
saying that Obama will turn into a deficit hawk. </p>
<h2>Rush: "[A] jury of peers of these 
terrorists" includes "Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann."</h2>

<p>Coming back from another break, Rush 
wondered if anyone "realize[s] Barack Obama is tougher on insurance companies 
than he is on the 9-11 
mastermind?" This, of course, reminded Rush of his anger over the upcoming 
transfer of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed. So he treated us to his 
delusional make-up of the alleged 
9-11 mastermind's true jury of peers: </p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: As long as we're throwing 
the rules out, here, we're conferring constitutional rights on noncitizens, why 
the hell do the jurors have to come from New York? Let's put Bill Ayers on the 
jury. Let's put his wife, Bernardine Dohrn, on the jury. Let's put Jeremiah 
Wright on the jury. Let's go get Saul Alinksy's son -- I think he lives in 
Boston -- put him on the jury. Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann. Who else could 
be -- we're talking about a jury of peers of these terrorists, who hated this 
country so much they wanted to blow up the World Trade Center and did. And Cindy 
Sheehan is the judge.</p>

<p>Oh! Put Harry Reid on the jury. 
"This war is lost. This war" -- and get Senator Durbin! Senator Durbin sides 
with these guys! Get Sestak. Durbin says that our interrogators were nothing 
than, like Pol Pots, renegades and the Nazis and the Soviet gulags and so forth. 
So, yeah, we get Dick Durbin. John Kerry, who served in Vietnam. John Kerry. Oh, 
oh. Look at the jury we could impanel here. 
</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush then rounded out his second 
hour by joining Glenn Beck in attacking Andy Stern by reading a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.heritage.org%2F2009%2F11%2F13%2Fmorning-bell-big-labor-is-bankrupting-our-country%2F">Heritage Foundation blog post</a>. Rush 
used this as a chance to plug the Heritage Foundation.</p>
<h2>Rush to open a chain of 
"Fat-Moms-R-Us" maternity clinics</h2>

<p>Coming back for the third hour, Rush 
treated us to a distinctly uninteresting story about how his buddy Vince Flynn's book is 
being turned into a movie.</p>

<p>Next, claiming that he had an 
advance copy of a <em>New York Times</em> 
story on immigration overhaul efforts as "a powerful, influential member of the 
media," Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F11%2F14%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2F14immig.html%3F_r%3D2%26hp">read the story, available online during his 
show</a>, 
and asserted that Obama will give 12 million illegal aliens amnesty next 
year.</p>

<p>Rush then joined <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fatlasshrugs2000.typepad.com%2Fatlas_shrugs%2F2009%2F11%2Fmajor-muslims-calling-card-soa-soldier-of-allah.html">far-right-wing blogger Pam Geller</a> in 
talking about Hasan's business card and joked that he thought the abbreviation 
"SWT" stood for "super wacky terrorist."</p>

<p>Rush finished off this segment by 
reading a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Fhealth%2Fhealthnews%2F6555422%2FFat-mothers-to-be-banned-from-hospital.html">U.K. <em title="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6555422/Fat-mothers-to-be-banned-from-hospital.html">Telegraph</em></a> article on 
overweight pregnant 
women being turned away from a single hospital in the U.K. because they are "not equipped to handle 
complicated births." Rush used this story to propose a wonderful new business 
opportunity in Great Britain, a chain of maternity clinics named 
"Fat-Moms-R-Us." Later on, Rush wondered if these hospitals in the U.K. would turn away overweight women seeking 
abortions.</p>
<h2>Rush: "[W]e are all Costa Ricans 
now"</h2>

<p>Back from another break, Rush again 
treated us to his new parody of the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwwf.worldwildlife.org%2Fsite%2FMessageViewer%3Fem_id%3D23821.0%26dlv_id%3D26081">video</a> of World Wildlife Fund staffers' children asking President Obama 
to attend the Copenhagen summit for a new global treaty to combat climate 
change.</p>

<p>Next, Rush took a caller who 
compared the public option to any problems with public schools and public 
housing. Rush said all you need to think when you hear "public option" is lines, 
lines, and more lines.</p>

<p>Rush then took a caller who 
mentioned the absentee ballots yet to be counted in the 23rd Congressional District election in New 
York, and Rush read an <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fhostednews%2Fap%2Farticle%2FALeqM5j0VibvgMRn4zDGTwEZjej-eRI1swD9BUA4300">AP story</a> on how the race has 
tightened and went on to gloat over the GOP gubernatorial victories in New 
Jersey and Virginia, suggesting that independents were voting for 
Republicans in large numbers.</p>

<p>Rush then came back from another 
break by having his favorite insurance company representative on the phone to 
talk about hospitals being set up in Costa Rica, treating it like an ad on his 
show. After a short break, Rush read some of the "thousands" of emails coming in 
from this call and declared that "we are all Costa Ricans 
now."</p>

<p>Rush's last caller of the day, and 
the week, complained about the bureaucratic hassle that imperiled his dream of 
inventing the perfect monthly toothbrush, eventually getting around to claiming that toothbrushes 
are being classified as medical devices and will be taxed under the House 
health care bill. Rush 
said tampons are also going to be taxed and imagined a rally of women waving 
tampons around in the air protesting the taxes, declaring it "a shame" that Ted Kennedy wouldn't be alive to see 
it.</p>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow 
and Kate Conway contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh 
Wire.</em></p>
<h2>Highlights</h2>
<blockquote>

<p> LIMBAUGH: This, 
my friends, is even more insidious than you know. This is more insidious than 
you can possibly imagine. I'm talking about bringing these terrorists up from 
Gitmo and trying them in New York City in a civil -- well, a civil -- criminal 
trial. It's just --</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Before I get into this 
disgusting travesty perpetrated here by Barack Obama, who -- you notice how this 
guy's always out of the country when bad news hits? Unemployment 9.4, flies off 
somewhere. Nine point seven, flies off somewhere. Ten point two, flies off 
somewhere. Sends Holder out there today to announce they're bringing the Gitmo 
detainees up here for trial. He's over there in Japan, and he pulled -- they 
asked him about it over there, and he pulled a Bill Clinton/Janet 
Reno.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Thus, the administration 
cooperates with the Obama left-wing base, giving it the reckoning it demands. 
But Obama gets to deny responsibility for any actual prosecutions. Now, we 
mentioned this to you last summer, that this was the objective of this. They 
don't want their fingerprints on it. But they want -- I mean, this is -- this -- 
again, this is banana republic-type stuff. This is Marxist-type stuff. You go 
after your predecessors and you put them in jail or you do what you can to 
embarrass them, discredit them, and ruin their lives.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: So, we're now going to 
have a trial that never had to happen for defendants who have no defense. That 
is key to understand what's happening here, folks. They have no defense. They 
have asked to be executed. They have admitted doing this. They're -- they take 
great pride in having blown up the World Trade Center. And as I said, when 
defendants have no defense for their actions, there's only one thing for their 
lawyers to do, and that's put the government on trial in hopes of getting the 
jury and the media spun up over government errors, government abuses, government 
incompetence. That's what's going to happen at this trial. It'll be a soapbox. 
Folks, it's going to be soapbox for Al Qaeda's case against America, and if you 
don't think that they can't find some pro bono ACLU lawyers to go in there and 
make the case that the United States of America is guilty, you have another 
thing coming.</p>

<p>And since that'll be their defense, 
quote-unquote, that the government of the United States is corrupt, unfair, 
unjust, and guilty, the defendants and their lawyers will demand every bit of 
information they can get about the interrogations, the renditions, secret 
prisons, undercover operations targeting Muslims in mosques, and depending on 
what judge catches the case, they're likely to be given a lot of 
it.</p>

<p>Because fairness is the -- has 
become the new foundation of the new America. Fairness as defined by a bunch of 
radical leftists. The administration will be able to claim that the judge, not 
the administration, is responsible for the exposure of our defense secrets. 
There won't be any fingerprints on Holder. There won't be any fingerprints of 
Obama's attached to this this. It's all going to fall on the judge. The judge is 
going to take the heat, and depending on who the judge is, he might enjoy it. I 
mean, there's a bunch of radical leftists on our federal bench as we sit here 
today. </p>

<p>And this circus is going to be 
played out for all to see. Holder's -- "Oh yeah, we're going to have TV cameras 
in there, we're" -- all of this. In the middle of a war, we are going to 
televise to the world exactly how a bunch of leftist lawyers and terrorists 
think this country sucks. And before it's all over, their lawyers are going to 
end up making the case that these guys had cause for hijacking airplanes and 
bringing down the twin towers. </p>

<p>At some point, that's where this 
goes. We're going to have so much sympathy for the discrimination against people 
from the religion of peace, that they were driven to this by our association 
with Israel. And before it's all said and done you're going to find some whacked 
nut jobs in the Upper West Side of Manhattan that are going to be on this jury 
who are going to end up thinking, "You know what? We did deserve it. Now we know 
why they don't like 'em, but maybe we can set the record straight here and go 
forward in peace if we just admit this was our fault." Endless fodder for the 
transnational left to press its case that actions taken in America's defense are 
violations of international law. And this is going to destroy the CIA. It will 
destroy the CIA, exposing virtually everything they've done, people who did it. 
It's not good, folks.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: And by the way, this 
decision was made by Obama. Not Holder. Holder is carrying out Obama's policies. 
Holder is Obama. Jeremiah Wright is Obama. Bill Ayers is Obama. Valerie Jarrett 
is Obama. Van Jones is Obama. And again, whether he's being naive and just 
doesn't understand it, hasn't properly educated, or whether it's diabolical and 
on purpose doesn't matter. The end result is the same.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Can you imagine this poor 
guy McChrystal? Here's this four-star general, and he has to sit there and 
listen to this community organizer, who wouldn't know the butt end of an AK-47 
if he saw it, tell him how to run a war. And then he's got to sit there and put 
up with a really strategically timed statement from our ambassador, appointed by 
Obama, in Kabul. </p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Outrageous 
comments</h2>
<blockquote>

<p> LIMBAUGH: Try 
this. There have been all kinds of people on television today being asked, 
"Bringing them into New York, doesn't that make New York a bigger terrorist 
target?" Hey. And they all say, "Well, no, no. New York's always a terrorist 
target. Look at '93. We tried those guys in 1993, and nothing happened." What do 
you mean, "Nothing happened"? You ever heard of 9-11? We tried these guys and 
convicted the blind sheikh in 1993 and nothing happened except 
9-11.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: It's really hard to say 
this to you, but you don't have a president who looks at life or war or the 
United States in any way, shape, manner, or form the way you do. You have a 
traditional view of this country based on your service to it and your commitment 
to it. We don't have a president who shares your commitment to the country, who 
shares your commitment to victory. We have a president and an administration who 
believes this country's guilty of things. And he's going to have trouble pulling 
the trigger on more troops over there, and even if he does pull the trigger on 
more troops, I think the constraints on their procedures over there, the rules 
of engagement, are going to be such that I -- it's going to be 
useless.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Folks, I'm sorry, I can't 
get off this decision to bring these terrorists to New York and conduct a trial. 
I just -- I -- this is such an insidious plot, it is such a disas-- do you 
realize Barack Obama is tougher on insurance companies than he is on the 9-11 
mastermind?</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: As long as we're throwing 
the rules out, here, we're conferring constitutional rights on noncitizens, why 
the hell do the jurors have to come from New York? Let's put Bill Ayers on the 
jury. Let's put his wife, Bernardine Dohrn, on the jury. Let's put Jeremiah 
Wright on the jury. Let's go get Saul Alinksy's son -- I think he lives in 
Boston -- put him on the jury. Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann. Who else could 
be -- we're talking about a jury of peers of these terrorists, who hated this 
country so much they wanted to blow up the World Trade Center and did. And Cindy 
Sheehan is the judge.</p>

<p>Oh! Put Harry Reid on the jury. 
"This war is lost. This war" -- and get Senator Durbin! Senator Durbin sides 
with these guys! Get Sestak. Durbin says that our interrogators were nothing 
than, like Pol Pots, renegades and the Nazis and the Soviet gulags and so forth. 
So, yeah, we get Dick Durbin. John Kerry, who served in Vietnam. John Kerry. Oh, 
oh. Look at the jury we could impanel here. </p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author>Z.P.</author>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911130030</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:29:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rush Compares Pelosi To Hitler And  Health Care Reform To Dachau</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911120045</link>
<description><![CDATA[<h2>Rush
falsely claimed Obama administration to "purge"
Republicans from government</h2>

<p>By
Tom Allison</p>

<p>Rush kicked
off today's show promoting a RedState <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.redstate.com%2Ferick%2F2009%2F11%2F12%2Fobama-administration-intends-to-purge-republicans-from-the-civil-service%2F">article</a>
that falsely claimed the Obama administration, through
the Office of Personnel Management,
"intends to purge all Republicans from the federal bureaucracy." Rush commented that this is an attempt to "purify"
the government. Not surprisingly, out came
the comparisons to totalitarian regimes, Marxism, and Hugo Chavez. </p>

<p>Rush
claimed that former President Bush left a lot
of democratically appointed employees from the Clinton administration. Rush said he saw similarities
between the Office of Personnel Management memo and "the unconstitutionality of
the czars."</p>

<p>Rush then talked about an address
he gave to the Boy Scouts of America function, where
he said he delivered a "profound heartfelt tribute" to Roger Ailes for
creating the "miracle" that is Fox News. Rush added that "Fox
is winning," and
also reported that there were "a lot of Fox people there" and he was honored to
be a part of it. </p>
<h2>Rush: Obama
is "a destructive ideologue"</h2>

<p>Rush dove
head first into an all-out assault on President Obama's economic policies, claiming that
the "<a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200910270044">man-child</a>" president doesn't really want to create jobs but
instead wants to "wipe out the rich." Discussing Obama's purported communist tendencies with a caller, Rush also commented that Obama doesn't know better
because that's how he was "raised." Limbaugh then floored it on the anti-Obama rhetoric:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Here's the truth, folks. I gotta say it. I have to say it again. Obama is open to learning
and understanding. He is on a mission. And when his mission
-- he's not open -- when his mission succeeds, the rest of the nation's
actions, people, the whole country fails. That's his mission. His success is the
failure of capitalism or the destruction of capitalism.</p>

<p>What we are witnessing is a failed presidency. It's
evidenced each and every day. We are in the midst of a failed presidency. We
are being led by a destructive ideologue, who
is on a mission -- and he's told us -- to remake this country.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush also
couldn't figure out why using unspent TARP money to pay down the budget deficit
made sense, arguing that it's like borrowing
money to pay back a debt. Rush also didn't believe that U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry is genuinely
cautious about authorizing more troops for Afghanistan, suggesting that it's
all too politically convenient. </p>

<p>Reading
from an Associated Press <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.yahoo.com%2Fs%2Fap%2F20091111%2Fap_on_bi_ge%2Fus_lost_decade">article</a>, Rush revived the comparison of Japan's "lost
decade" to the American recovery, something <em>Media
Matters for America</em> has <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200901050007">repeatedly</a> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200812220005">analyzed and corrected</a>.</p>

<p>Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910160029">couldn't resist smearing Anita
Dunn</a>, commenting that Obama might drop her off in China during his upcoming trip to Asia. </p>

<p>Rush
claimed that "there was no private sector growth" in the third quarter of this fiscal year,
suggesting that someone should FedEx his <em>Wall Street
Journal</em> op-ed to the White House because there were some "good ideas
in there." <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200901290029">Several
economists</a> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200901290025">disagree</a>.</p>
<h2>Rush
compared Pelosi to Hitler and health care reform to Dachau
</h2>

<p>Rush
continued ranting about the state of the
economy, gleefully blaming Obama for the unemployment rate and labeling the
stimulus package "a slush fund" for congressional
campaigns and saying it's a way for Congress to
buy support from the AMA and AARP.</p>

<p>Rush also
theorized that people in Washington actually think Republicans aren't getting
jobs on purpose just to make Obama look bad. And finally, in an attempt to pack
in as many tired falsehoods and smears in an hour of radio as possible, Rush
repeated the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911120022">false claim</a>
that failure to buy health insurance under the House health care bill would result in jail time. </p>

<p>But why
stop at mischaracterizing provisions of the House bill. Why not compare Speaker
Nancy Pelosi to Hitler and government's
involvement in health care to the Dachau concentration
camp?</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: And by the way, the media tweak of the day: Hitler put people in jail to lower the unemployment
numbers. Another media tweak, that's how Dachau
started. We have 35 seconds if you think we should bleep or edit this out. I
frankly think we should not. I didn't say anything about Obama there; I'm just giving a little historical truth. </p>

<p>Is this is all about Pelosi? This is
all -- how many seconds we got before we bleep it? Twenty? I'm not going to bleep
it out, Snerdley.
Look, this is Pelosi. She called us Nazis, swastikas during the tea parties. Now they call us teabaggers. She said it's OK to put people
in jail for not buying health insurance. Well? Historical -- OK, well, we can't bleep it now,
Snerdley. The delay went by.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush later
announced an on-air "unemployment summit" to coincide with Obama's job summit, where, for three
hours, Rush will take calls from Americans
looking for work, something Limbaugh claimed Obama should be doing.</p>
<h2>Rush:
"[W]e don't have the
guts to keep [Muslims] out of our institutions"</h2>

<p>Rush read
from a <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F11%2F12%2Fus%2F12families.html%3F_r%3D1%26scp%3D1%26sq%3Djob%2520woes%2Bfamily%2520life%26st%3Dcse">piece</a>
on the emotional and psychological impact the recession has had on families
with unemployed parents. Always playing the victim, Rush
interpreted the article as "anti-male" and "anti-father" because it framed
familial problems around the father being home. </p>

<p>Back from
the break, Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911100028">again mocked</a>
the World Wildlife Fund ad featuring children warning against climate change. Rush
then talked about a <em>Hill</em> newspaper <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fhomenews%2Fadministration%2F67011-white-house-wont-rule-out-reconciliation-rules-on-healthcare">article</a>
on the White House hinting that budget reconciliation could still be used to
pass health care in the Senate, claiming that
"they're breaking their own rules." </p>

<p>Rush also
opined on whether the CDC was inflating the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.yahoo.com%2Fs%2Fap%2F20091111%2Fap_on_he_me%2Fus_med_swine_flu">risk of
swine flu</a>
for counting the number of deaths "caused by complications related to swine
flu" and called the government response another Obama and government failure. </p>

<p>Rush
promoted a Hot Air <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fhotair.com%2Farchives%2F2009%2F11%2F12%2Fbreaking-hasan-wired-money-to-pakistan%2F">post</a> on reports
that alleged Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan might have been wiring money
to Afghanistan. Rush then ranted about other
possible Islamic extremists in the military, suggesting that we hold a summit
on what to do about them. Later on, Rush exaggerated
Hasan's <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911060011">role</a> on the George
 Washington University
task force, agreeing with a caller that "a terrorist" helped shape foreign and
domestic policy. Rush concluded that the Democrats' strategy of treating
terrorism as a criminal matter will not stop future attacks. After all, Rush
said, "[W]e don't have the guts to keep
[Muslims] out of our institutions."</p>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow, Kate Conway, and Zachary Pleat contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh
Wire.</em></p>
<h2>Highlights</h2>

<p><strong>Outrageous comments</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
Now last night, flew into New York -- actually, I was in Westchester
 County. The
Westchester-Putnam County Council of the Boy Scouts of America awarded my good
friend Roger Ailes the 2000 night -- the 2009 Good
Scout Award. As
you know, he's the CEO of Fox News Channel. And I was -- I just randomly opening my mail one day
and I got an invitation to go to this thing, and I moved the schedule around to
be able to go up there and do it because I wanted to -- you know, I asked for seven or eight minutes
to speak and they gave it to me.</p>

<p>And I did a
profound, heartfelt tribute to Roger and what he means to the country, what he
means -- has meant to me, the miracle that he has created, the culture that
he's -- one man -- they got 1,700 people that work at Fox. Roger's never been on
camera. Roger is not actively in the director's chair every day for all these
shows, and yet he's created this culture where everybody there is on the same
page and proud, and they're winning. Four times the audience of all the other
three combined. And it's just incredible.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
All of this has been a scam. Folks, the bottom
line is TARP, stimulus -- it's the Chicago
way. All this is, is getting money that you could have never voted through Congress to
pay off your political buddies and buy votes like with the AARP and the AMA and
whoever else you're gonna need. It's a slush fund. You wonder why they haven't
spent but 14 percent of the stimulus? Because
they never intended to. </p>

<p>It's a
slush fund. It's
gonna be used for Democrat re-election campaigns next year. It is used to pay
off members of Congress and whoever for their votes on needed Obama
legislation. I mean, this is classic, right out of the way Marxists and
socialists and Stalinists do things. It's just -- imagine a slush fund of over
a trillion bucks, almost 2 trillion, and that's
what we're looking at here.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
Here's the truth, folks. I gotta say it. I have
to say it again. Obama is open to learning and understanding. He is on a
mission. And
when his mission -- he's not open -- when his
mission succeeds, the rest of the nation's actions, people, the whole country
fails. That's his mission. His success is the failure of capitalism or the
destruction of capitalism.</p>

<p>What we are
witnessing is a failed presidency. It's evidenced each and every day. We are in
the midst of a failed presidency. We are being led by a destructive ideologue, who is on a mission -- and he's told us -- to
remake this country.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
Being charitable -- as charitable as I can -- this may not be Obama's fault. He is who he is.
He was raised by communists. He was mentored -- well, it
was Frank -- Frank Davis was an avowed
communist. His father, Barack Obama Senior, was one as well. Now, we know that
he's been educated in the Ivy League, which teaches the unfairness -- inherent
unfairness in this country that capitalism's
unfair, that it leads to unequal results, discrimination, poverty for some,
wealth for others. I mean, he's been taught
that this country's unjust and immoral, which is why I suggested, you know, a
couple of night classes on capitalism. </p>

<p>"Now, Rush, don't you think that he's actually been
exposed to it?" Oh, I think he's been exposed to it, but from a standpoint of
how unfair, how mean-spirited, and how unjust
it is. Well, you -- look
it. You know
what your kids are faced with in school every day, what they're being taught
about American history, and what they're being
taught about the evils this nation perpetrated after it was founded, even
before it was founded, when our ancestors arrived here. You can imagine what this guy's been taught, and we know that he
thinks it. He said it in his books, all over
the place, various interviews. So, he is who he is.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
And by the way, the media tweak of the day: Hitler
put people in jail to lower the unemployment numbers. Another media tweak,
that's how Dachau
started. We have 35 seconds if you think we should bleep or edit this out. I
frankly think we should not. I didn't say anything about Obama there; I'm just giving a little historical truth. </p>

<p>Is
this is all about
Pelosi? This is all -- how many seconds we got
before we bleep it? Twenty?
I'm not going to bleep it out, Snerdley. Look, this is Pelosi. She called us Nazis,
swastikas during the tea parties. Now they call us
teabaggers. She said it's OK to put people in jail for not buying health
insurance. Well? Historical -- OK, well, we
can't bleep it now, Snerdley. The delay went by.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I
guess we're just on the verge of internment camps. I know a little bit about
those internment camps. The Japanese in this country -- Japanese soldiers were permitted to fight, you know, the Japanese
descent, but not in the Pacific theater, they
were sent to Europe. They were not, you know -- we did things differently back then. We were
threatening -- the Japanese bombed us; we said, OK, we're not taking any chances, and it was a liberal Democrat that did it. </p>

<p>And now, we've got Obama in the White House and they're
talking about an internment of Muslims out
there on left-wing talk shows? Don't have the guts -- I mean, we don't have the guts to keep them out of
our institutions, much less in -- I'm not
suggesting -- I
think it's just paranoia these people are constantly living in, and they're
paranoid of us. They think we're going to demand it and Obama's going to do it,
which is simply laughable.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>America's Truth Rejector</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: This is what Marxists do.
This is a purge. This is typical of Marxist regimes, totalitarian regimes. And
I -- I'll tell ya what: I hope the next
Republican administration learns this lesson, because there are going to be
thousands of Maoists, sleazing their way into
the bureaucracy after whatever number of years Obama is in the White House. The
bureaucracy is being polluted with these people and --
just as the Democrats
and Obama are gonna purge all Republicans from the civil service. </p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
And the interpretation of this is clear. That's why I keep an eye on Venezuela,
I keep an eye on totalitarian regimes, because this is a purge, to purify the
federal government.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911120045</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:04:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh: Obama's  Ft. Hood Memorial Speech Was "Empty" And "Meaningless"</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911110039</link>
<description><![CDATA[

<p>By Zachary Pleat</p>
<h2>Rush: The press is "twisting itself into pretzels" to 
"deny the reality" of the Fort Hood shootings</h2>

<p>Without wasting any time, Rush 
started off his show today by talking about Bill Clinton, specifically his 
meeting yesterday with Senate Democrats over lunch. Rush characterized Clinton's 
comments by saying that he was telling Senate Democrats to just pass whatever 
they can and amend it year after year.</p>

<p>Next, Rush seemed to be happy that 
the Associated Press used the word "malaise" <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.yahoo.com%2Fs%2Fap%2F20091110%2Fap_on_go_pr_wh%2Fus_obama_ap_poll%3B_ylt%3DAgym8d2bVPyjibSosAYOGop0fNdF">in an article on the economy</a>, 
although he complained that the AP is "still hanging in there" for President Obama and that it's 
blaming American citizens for their negative feelings about the 
economy.</p>

<p>Rush then talked about <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whitehouse.gov%2Fthe-press-office%2Fremarks-president-memorial-service-fort-hood">Obama's speech</a> at Fort Hood 
yesterday, calling it the most "empty" and "meaningless" speech ever. He said 
that if you didn't know what happened at Fort Hood, you wouldn't know what Obama 
was talking about. After playing a montage of media figures saying that Obama's 
speech reminded them of Bill Clinton after Oklahoma City, Rush claimed that the 
media think tragedies are good for presidents and again said Clinton blamed him 
for Oklahoma City. </p>

<p>While reading a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fcorner.nationalreview.com%2Fpost%2F%3Fq%3DYjVlNjliYjEyOWI2NmZiM2JjNWYzNTFkNzJlNWQ5OWU">National Review Online post</a> that 
postulated that militant opposition to U.S. military operations is mainstream 
among Muslims, Rush wondered if Obama is just na&iuml;ve, because he's got to know 
what jihad is. Rush then delved back into his analysis of Obama's Fort Hood 
speech, saying it was yet another apology by Obama. Rush returned to the NRO 
post and repeated his statement from yesterday that shooting suspect Nidal Hasan wasn't under the 
radar, he was in fact "on stage."</p>

<p>Next, Rush played a clip of Fox News strategic analyst 
Ralph Peters demanding that Obama admit that the Fort Hood shooting was an act 
of terror. Rush said that Obama can't admit it was terrorism because it occurred 
on his watch.</p>

<p>After playing a clip of "Obama's 
patron," Chicago Mayor 
Richard Daley, talking 
about the Fort Hood shootings, Rush claimed that Daley is blaming the massacre 
on America's love of guns. Rush suggested that if they were armed, there may 
have been less carnage.</p>

<p>Fresh from the first break of his 
show, Rush said that the press "is twisting itself into pretzels," doing all it can to "deny the reality" 
of what happened at Fort Hood. </p>

<p>Rush then mocked the media's concern 
about the tea-party 
movement "ginning up violence" against Obama and attacked CNN for airing 
comments from a Muslim cleric calling Obama a "murderer," among other things. He then touted himself 
as a media expert who could explain why CNN had "zero" ratings, but managed to 
avoid this explanation by going to another "obscene profit 
break."</p>

<p>Back from the break, Rush took a 
caller from Tampa, who urged Rush to suspend his rhetoric for today, Veterans 
Day, to honor America's veterans. Rush responded by calling him possibly the 
most ignorant caller ever and launching into a list of his efforts to visit and 
assist wounded veterans. Rush eventually called him a "doofus" and an "idiot," 
and then used the 
opportunity to again accuse Obama of dithering on Afghanistan and denying the 
reality of what happened at Fort Hood.</p>

<p>Next, Rush decided to anoint Obama 
"the Iceman" to 
introduce a 4-day-old <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworldnews%2Fnorthamerica%2Fusa%2Fbarackobama%2F6520286%2FBloodless-President-Barack-Obama-makes-Americans-wistful-for-George-W-Bush.html">U.K. <em title="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/6520286/Bloodless-President-Barack-Obama-makes-Americans-wistful-for-George-W-Bush.html">Telegraph</em> article</a> about 
how Obama was making Americans "wistful" for George W .Bush. After confessing his ignorance about 
why Bush was ever called a hothead, Rush claimed that "we wanted hot headedness" 
after 9-11. Rush again said Obama is "uncomfortable with the concept of 
victory." After reading this article, Rush claimed that "you do not understand 
the ego of this man, the narcissistic ego of this man."</p>

<p>Rush then explained that speeches 
won't un-nuke Iran, stop Kim Jong-il, or stop whatever Rush thinks Huge Chavez is planning 
for Venezuela. Rush 
shared a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F11%2F08%2Fweekinreview%2F08baker.html%3F_r%3D2%26scp%3D1%26sq%3Dthe%2520words%2520who%2520once%2520soared%26st%3Dcse"><em title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/weekinreview/08baker.html?_r=2&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=the words who once soared&amp;st=cse">N</em><em title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/weekinreview/08baker.html?_r=2&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=the words who once soared&amp;st=cse">ew </em><em title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/weekinreview/08baker.html?_r=2&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=the words who once soared&amp;st=cse">Y</em><em title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/weekinreview/08baker.html?_r=2&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=the words who once soared&amp;st=cse">ork </em><em title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/weekinreview/08baker.html?_r=2&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=the words who once soared&amp;st=cse">T</em><em title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/weekinreview/08baker.html?_r=2&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=the words who once soared&amp;st=cse">imes</em> article</a> about the possible waning 
influence of Obama's speeches and helpfully explained why this was happening: 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Cause they are the same 
thing. The same thing regurgitated over and over and again. We live in an era of 
divisiveness, we live in an age of cynicism, we live in an age of selfishness. 
My country sucks. And now that I'm here it's going to get better. And we're 
going to work hard and we're going to find jobs. These speeches do not inspire 
anymore. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Coming back from another break, Rush 
mentioned what he called interesting polling data from <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gallup.com%2Fpoll%2F124226%2FRepublicans-Edge-Ahead-Democrats-2010-Vote.aspx">Gallup</a> and <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rasmussenreports.com%2Fpublic_content%2Fpolitics%2Fmood_of_america%2Fgeneric_congressional_ballot">Rasmussen</a> showing that Republicans 
are several points ahead in generic congressional ballots. Rush called this 
unprecedented, because according to him, Republicans never lead in generic 
polls, and claimed that the whole Obama agenda and the bad economy are moving independents to 
support Republicans. Rush then returned to Clinton's meeting with Senate 
Democrats, 
characterizing it as 
his instructing them on 
"how to fly their Zeros straight into our aircraft carriers."</p>
<h2>Rush: "So the It's-Our-Fault Administration continues"</h2>

<p>Rush started off the second hour by 
reading <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.app.com.pk%2Fen_%2Findex.php%3Foption%3Dcom_content%26task%3Dview%26id%3D89601%26Itemid%3D2">a Pakistani news article</a> on 
Secretary of State Hillary 
Clinton's visit to Pakistan, concluding the article on Clinton's 
comments by saying, "So there's -- that's who we are, that's who we have, that's 
who we have running our country. They're all Alinskyites."</p>

<p>Next, Rush talked about the possible 
deployment of additional troops to Afghanistan and complained for a while that 
Obama has never explained why we are in Afghanistan. Rush used this to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911010005">repeat</a> his accusation that Obama 
doesn't care about Afghanistan.</p>

<p>Rush then launched into a 
long-winded explanation of how Obama has "failed to connect the dots" between 
problems as various as Iran, missile defense in Europe, jihad and terrorism, and 
several other subjects that Rush felt like complaining about today. Rush 
concluded this explanation by claiming that the Obama administration is just 
sitting around and "hoping for the best."</p>

<p>Back from another break, Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2009%2F11%2F10%2Fcoverage-fort-hood-shooting-press-dodges-religious-component%2F">mentioned a FoxNews.com story</a> about 
previous investigations into Hasan to complain that the government failed, yet 
again. Rush complained that people are worried the right wing will be set off by this, claiming that "we are the 
enemy," not Hasan, to 
the Obama administration. </p>

<p>Rush then joined many other 
conservative media figures in complaining about Gen. George Casey's comments about diversity in 
the military and worries about a possible backlash against Muslims in America, 
declaring, "There 
aren't any hate crimes. There is no backlash against Muslims in America. Zip, 
zero, nada."</p>

<p>Rush then launched into a fairly 
nonsensical rant, 
complaining that competition and keeping score are being removed from the military, but that 
American soldiers are keeping score like this: Islamic terrorists, 13, Fort Hood, 0. Rush emphasized that soldiers everywhere 
"know it." Rush then said Obama's comments were "drivel" and complained that 
Obama went down to Fort Hood and still didn't get it. </p>

<p>Next, Rush again complained that 
conservatives were being blamed for everything, from 9-11 to Hurricane Katrina to Dr. 
George Tiller's murder, and that he personally was blamed for Donovan McNabb 
having a lousy season. Rush then claimed that conservatives are "the Satan" in 
the liberal "religion" and that conservatives need protection, not 
Muslims.</p>

<p>Rush then took a caller who compared 
Hasan to Bill Ayers. Rush joked that they don't yet know if Hasan was a friend 
of Obama's, and they both jokingly agreed that if he plays his cards right, 
Hasan too can chair a department at a prestigious university.</p>

<p>Next, Rush had a caller who 
mentioned her aunt's role in the Manhattan Project and who closed her call by advocating for more nuclear energy. Rush 
followed this up by reading a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F11%2F10%2Fbusiness%2Fenergy-environment%2F10nukes.html%3Fscp%3D1%26sq%3Delectricty%2Brussia%2527s%2520nuclear%2520weapons%26st%3Dcse"><em title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/business/energy-environment/10nukes.html?scp=1&amp;sq=electricty+russia's nuclear weapons&amp;st=cse">N</em><em title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/business/energy-environment/10nukes.html?scp=1&amp;sq=electricty+russia's nuclear weapons&amp;st=cse">ew </em><em title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/business/energy-environment/10nukes.html?scp=1&amp;sq=electricty+russia's nuclear weapons&amp;st=cse">Y</em><em title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/business/energy-environment/10nukes.html?scp=1&amp;sq=electricty+russia's nuclear weapons&amp;st=cse">ork </em><em title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/business/energy-environment/10nukes.html?scp=1&amp;sq=electricty+russia's nuclear weapons&amp;st=cse">T</em><em title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/business/energy-environment/10nukes.html?scp=1&amp;sq=electricty+russia's nuclear weapons&amp;st=cse">imes</em> article</a> explaining that some energy in America is being produced from retired Soviet nuclear 
weapons. </p>

<p>Rush then asserted that a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F11%2F11%2Fworld%2Famericas%2F11venez.html">story</a> about blackouts in Venezuela 
is a "teachable moment" for America. He explained that he focuses on Venezuela 
because he's afraid America is destined to become Venezuela if "we aren't 
vigilant." </p>

<p>Rush then used the mention of an 
interview David Plouffe had with Chris Matthews, due to his new book, to brag 
about the <em>New 
York Times</em> best-seller spots held by conservative books. Rush 
interrupted the interview with his own laughter, mocking the idea that 
he had anything to do with Republican congressional candidate Dede Scozzafava 
dropping out of the race in New 
York's 23rd District. Unfortunately for Rush, his protestations of 
innocence in that race 
<a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911040024">are 
completely undermined</a> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911030026">by</a> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911020021">his</a> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911020022">own</a> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200911010010">words</a>.</p>

<p>Rush finished his second hour by 
comparing Plouffe's claim that Rush was instrumental in purging Scozzafava from 
the congressional race to Obama's campaign appearances in New Jersey for 
incumbent Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine, asking, "Who spent more time 
campaigning: Barack Obama in New Jersey or me in New York-23? I didn't go there 
a single day." Of course, Rush's nationally syndicated program <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.790wtny.com%2FProgramSchedule%2Ftabid%2F54%2FDefault.aspx">is available six days of the week</a> in 
that area. </p>
<h2>Rush: "If anybody's close to being a 
teabagger, it's President Clinton"</h2>

<p>Back for the third hour, Rush 
continued his new obsession with Plouffe claiming that Rush was partially 
responsible for purging Scozzafava and said that Plouffe was really worried that 
he would purge the Blue Dogs. </p>

<p>Rush then took on Bill Clinton for 
reportedly referring to tea-party activists as teabaggers: 
</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Folks, we have reached a 
tipping point in vulgarity. Perhaps. President Clinton has once again demeaned 
himself by using a phrase describing a perverse sexual act, teabagging, as an 
attack and slur on Americans he used to lead. We're talking about Americans who 
do not engage in vulgar sexual acts. As President Clinton has engaged in. If 
anybody's close to being a teabagger, it's President Clinton. 
</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush then referred to Clinton as a 
"sexual predator" and doubled down on his previous reference to Clinton making 
the Democrats pilot airplanes into aircraft carriers to say he turned the 
Democratic Party into the "Kamikaze Party." Rush then wondered: If Bill Clinton thinks health care reform is such a winner, why pass it 
now? Why not wait until closer to the next election? Rush then spent some time 
comparing the current effort to reform America's health care system to what 
happened under Clinton in the 1990s. </p>

<p>Rush finished this segment by 
lamenting that Hillary Clinton didn't mention President Reagan in her remarks at 
the 20th anniversary of the dismantling of the Berlin Wall. </p>

<p>Coming back from the break, Rush 
proudly hyped <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.semissourian.com%2Fstory%2F1586060.html">an 
op-ed</a> on the shortage of swine flu vaccinations in his hometown newspaper, 
ranting that this was proof of government rationing. After a short break, Rush 
continued to complain about the situation faced by the senior citizen from his 
hometown, stating that the situation is a "rationed care death panel" under the 
oversight of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen 
Sebelius.</p>

<p>Rush then spent some time explaining 
his appearance on Sacramento radio station KFPK, and then <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fmfile.akamai.com%2F5020%2Fwma%2Frushlimb.download.akamai.com%2F5020%2FRushKFBK%2Frushkfbk.asx">treated us to some excerpts from his guest 
appearance</a>. Rush then teased us by promising he'll provide 
more excerpts tomorrow, 
and instead plugged the Heritage Foundation.</p>

<p>Feeling pressed for time in his 
final segment, Rush just rattled off the headlines of several news stories, and 
hilariously <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fhostednews%2Fafp%2Farticle%2FALeqM5ioKN-6tqKqccbLbVgmtkNuDRgo7w">hyped a story</a> reporting that the 
melting of Antarctica's ice helps offset global warming while simultaneously 
claiming that there isn't any melting going on. As good a note as any to end the 
not-quite 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month of the year's 
<em>The Rush Limbaugh 
Show</em>.</p>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow 
and Kate Conway contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh 
Wire.</em></p>
<h2>Highlights </h2>
<blockquote>

<p> LIMBAUGH: The 
rhetoric of this program is in defense of military personnel killed at Fort Hood 
and we are talking about a president who either doesn't or refuses to recognize 
a genuine threat that this country faces, who is dithering in Afghanistan. While 
three months ago the commander on the ground requested 40,000 more troops the 
president of the United States made a political calculation, he needed the House 
to pass his health care bill first before he could send the troops because he 
didn't want to lose his left-wing base, which is 
anti-military.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Barack Obama once said to 
Harry Reid, "Harry, I've got a gift." Obama thinks it's his speeches. Obam-- folks, you do not 
understand the ego of this man, the narcissistic ego of this man. The hardest 
thing for him to do every day is to turn away from the mirror after he gets 
dressed.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: In fact -- I've got to find this during the break. 
There's a story I missed from over the weekend in <em>The New York Times</em> by Peter Baker in which 
this whole point was made. Mr. President, these speeches are starting to sound 
tired and the same and -- yeah, yeah, here it is. I just happened to find it. 
The President whose words once soared. November 8th. Peter Baker. "As the most 
gifted orator of his generation, President O" -- he's not an orator, he's a 
teleprompter-reader. </p>

<p>"As the most gifted orator of his 
generation President Obama finds speech-making perhaps his most potent political 
tool. It propelled him to national promise in 2004 and the White House in 2008. 
And whenever he needs to calm economic fears or revive stalled health care 
legislation he takes to the lectern." He isn't calming anybody, this is the 
point. "But the limits of rhetoric were on display last week when the president 
could not rescue two foundering candidates in governor's races in New Jersey and 
Virginia. Has Mr. Obama lost his oratorical touch? Is the magic finally 
beginning to fade? Does the White House rely too heavily on his skills on the 
stump to advance his priorities? It may be too soon to reach such conclusions. 
The Democrats who lost last week, after all, had fatal flaws all their own. But 
the results do suggest that Obama's addresses these days may not resonate quite 
the way they did. Speeches that once set pulses racing now feel more familiar." 
</p>

<p>Cause they are the same thing. The 
same thing regurgitated over and over and again. We live in an era of 
divisiveness, we live in an age of cynicism, we live in an age of selfishness. 
My country sucks. And now that I'm here it's going to get better. And we're 
going to work hard and we're going to find jobs. These speeches do not inspire 
anymore.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: "Secretary of State 
Hillary Clinton has pledged continued pressure on militants along the 
Pakistan-Afghanistan border and noted that the United States bears some 
responsibility for helping to create terrorists that threaten America and its 
allies." So the It's-Our-Fault Administration continues. 
"Clinton also said in an interview that she's convinced of Pakistan's strong 
commitment to get rid of terrorists as she recognized that the South Asian 
nation is responding forcefully to the Taliban threat in areas bordering 
Afghanistan. The chief U.S. diplomat told popular Charlie Rose TV show that she 
listened to Pakistani concerns during her recent visit, and in her meetings with 
the civil society representatives also aired U.S. concerns on some issues 
including the whereabouts of Al Qaeda leaders. 'Well I did raise that question 
because I was very willing to hear all the questions and the concerns from the 
people in the government of Pakistan. There are reasons for their concerns, I 
mean, we haven't always been the most consistent or understanding partner and 
ally over the course of our relationship and we do bear some of the 
responsibility, frankly, for helping to create the very terrorists that we are 
now all threatened by.' " Our secretary of State. In Pakistan. Making that 
statement. So there's -- that's who we are, that's who we have, that's who we 
have running our country. They're all Alinskyites.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: And General Casey is now 
the Chief of Staff of the Army and he talked about the diversity in the Army, 
and oh, how this incident is so -- he said something to the effect that it'd be 
so bad, it'd be even worse if this incident caused us to lose our diversity in 
the military. And he went out there and said we're going to do everything we can 
to make sure there's not a backlash against the Muslim soldiers in our military. 
Janet Napolitano of the United Arab Emirates says we're gonna do everything we 
can to make sure there's not a backlash against Muslim-Americans in the United 
States, and there are statistics and numbers out there. Hate crimes against 
Muslims are at an all-time low; since 2001, they have plummeted. There aren't 
any hate crimes. There is no backlash against Muslims in America. Zip, zero, 
nada.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I got a quick question 
here for David Plouffe. He says I'm out there with Sarah Palin purging moderate 
members from the Republican Party. David Plouffe, a question from me, El Rushbo, 
the leader of the GOP. Who spent more time campaigning: Barack Obama in New 
Jersey or me in New York-23? I didn't go there a single day. Obama went to New 
Jersey three or four times, right? So who's purging what, Mr. 
Plouffe.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Folks, we have reached a 
tipping point in vulgarity. Perhaps. President Clinton has once again demeaned 
himself by using a phrase describing a perverse sexual act, teabagging, as an 
attack and slur on Americans he used to lead. We're talking about Americans who 
do not engage in vulgar sexual acts. As President Clinton has engaged in. If 
anybody's close to being a teabagger, it's President Clinton.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Statists sat in there and 
revised history books to take out all the stuff that the statists didn't want in 
there. This is exactly what Clinton's doing now. And by the way, ditto Hillary 
Clinton over there at the Brandenburg Gate. I don't care what your politics, how 
you can not mention Ronald Reagan, a former president of the United States, who 
was instrumental in the fall of Soviet Communism, how you can not mention him 
and still say that you are for a unified America is beyond me. How you can go 
over there and you can praise the current president who was barely reaching 
puberty when all that happened and probably regrets that it did. You mention 
him, you don't mention Thatcher. She's right there just, you know, a couple 
countries away in Europe. You don't mention Pope John Paul II, who was a huge 
role in it. You don't do -- these people, folks. They are <em>1984</em>, they are Saul Alinsky, they're Abbie 
Hoffman, they are -- they're a 60s radical bunch and they have finally got their 
arms around this country. And they're going to run it into the 
ground.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Now that last column, 
letter to the editor I read was from the <em>Southeast Missourian</em> today by a senior 
citizen who lives in my hometown, Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and he's been 
advised by his doctor to get the swine flu vaccine, and he went in there and the 
doctor had three vaccines, and the doctor said you've got to call the county 
health department. Folks, this is a death panel.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: So melting ice caps, which 
are not melting, but if they do, it's now a good thing. These people are turning 
themselves into pretzels. </p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author>Z.P.</author>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911110039</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:31:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rush: "Imagine if the Fort Hood Shooter ... was shouting Jesus Christ"</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911100043</link>
<description><![CDATA[<h2>Rush
"expecting ... Obama
to drop off Anita Dunn in Asia ... so she can fully
immerse herself in her Maoism"</h2>

<p>By Zachary Pleat</p>

<p>Rush began
his show today by asking his audience to stop emailing him, he knows that
"Anita Hun -- ahem -- Anita Dunn" is leaving the administration, and he says he
reported this a week ago. Rush, of course,
has <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910160029">previously</a> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910200019">smeared Anita Dunn</a> for having cited Mao. </p>

<p>Segueing into
his analysis of our current economic situation, Rush
then decided to highlight the
unemployment rate: </p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: That 10.2 percent rate is not accurate. It is
always calculated low. I have talked to many economists who claim that the --
to calculate the actual U.S.
unemployment rate, you multiply whatever the government says by one and a half.
During a recession, you multiply it by two. So 10 and a half unemployment
reported by government would equal 21 percent out in the real world. And there
are all kinds of factors of people that are not working, have given up trying
to work, and there are people who are still working who are being overworked by
people who refuse to hire anybody new but they're making them work longer
hours. There are also people in jobs that they hate but they can't leave
because there's nowhere else to go. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>This
led Rush to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911010002">repeat
his belief that this was all being done on purpose</a>, and then complain about the media and the Obama administration measuring
created or saved jobs, even though <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200906090018">the Bush administration did the same thing repeatedly</a>. </p>

<p>Moving
on, Rush continued his
meme that the purpose of health-care reform
is just to make people more dependent on government.</p>

<p>After
calling health care
reform the Democrat Incumbency Forever Act, Rush then said that the Democratic leadership was so
desperate to pass health care reform that "they're willing to even lose their
majority to get this." </p>
<h2>Rush:
"Imagine if the Fort Hood Shooter ... was shouting Jesus Christ"</h2>

<p>Coming back
from the first break, Rush brought up the tragic Fort Hood
shootings, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911060032">jumping on the "political correctness"
bandwagon</a>. Rush also criticized Obama's
initial <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whitehouse.gov%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2F05%2Ffort-hood">comments</a>
about the Fort Hood
shootings as "out of touch" and "insensitive."</p>

<p><strong>&nbsp;</strong>After another break, Rush wondered if anyone would have jumped to conclusions if
the alleged Fort Hood shooter "was shouting Jesus Christ," or if a Planned
Parenthood clinic was shot up. Rush then complained that Obama said we
shouldn't jump to conclusions about the shooter, and contrasted it with Obama's
first comments about the arrest of Professor Gates, which Rush did yesterday as
well.</p>

<p>Rush then
ended the first hour by <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911090019">again</a> claiming
that the Fort Hood shooter and his "radical imam" are
"just like Obama" and Rev. Jeremiah Wright. </p>
<h2>Rush:
"Terrorists are getting a pass."</h2>

<p>Rush
started off the second hour by wondering if the FBI and the Justice Department
should be "turned upside down and shaken up" for their alleged failure to stop suspected Fort Hood
shooter Nidal Hasan. Rush said Hasan was
"on stage", and that he was in "full imam garb" hours before he allegedly shot
up Fort Hood.</p>

<p>Rush then
played a parody of a public service announcement
on "Pre-Traumatic Stress Disorder" -- only
three years after <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theonion.com%2Fcontent%2Fnews%2Freport_more_u_s_soldiers_suffering">The
Onion</a> beat him to it. </p>

<p>Next, Rush
read a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fsweetness-light.com%2Farchive%2Fobamas-empathy-theme-regarding-911">Sweetness &amp; Light article</a> entitled
"Obama's Empathy For 9-11 Terrorists" and claimed that under Obama, "terrorists are
getting a pass," which served to prove that "there
are some sick people running the show in this country."</p>

<p>Returning from another
break, Rush mentioned
the impending execution of the convicted D.C. sniper, John Allen Muhammad. </p>

<p>Rush then
played an interview in which ABC's Jake Tapper asked
President Obama about the decision to send
more troops to Afghanistan.
Rush got angry at Obama's response because he mentioned the costs of sending
troops into the theater, ranting about how "only now" does Obama care about
costs, "50 measly billion dollars to win a war
after $750 billion in TARP money?" </p>

<p>Next, Rush
moved onto the issue of federal funding for abortions in the health-care reform bill, assuring his listeners that
abortion funding will indeed be in the final bill, or else the Democrats would
not pass it.</p>

<p>Rush then
repeated his astonishment that failure to obey the law could result in jail
time, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911070007">echoing</a> the
Drudge Report's fear mongering of jail time for failure to buy health
insurance. </p>

<p>Rush rounded
out the second hour by announcing that he would
be doing an hour of radio on Sacramento's
KFBK, where Rush <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kfbk.com%2Fpages%2Flimbaugh.html">said he
started his radio career in 1984</a>. </p>
<h2>Rush:
"[M]any children of the Middle East are having
explosives strapped on them by their parents and sent onto buses"</h2>

<p>Rush
started off the final hour of his show today by mentioning <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2009%2FPOLITICS%2F11%2F09%2Fbill.clinton.health.care.senate%2Findex.html">Bill
Clinton's visit</a> to several Democratic senators,
and repeated his earlier claim that the Democrats are willing to lose
congressional seats to pass health care reform.</p>

<p>After then complaining about a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fpublicpolicypolling.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fsome-interesting-health-care-numbers.html">Public
Policy Polling post</a> concerning how the health care reform issue affects Republicans,
calling the authors "clowns," Rush touted a Gallup
poll to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200910270034">flawed claim</a>
that 40 percent of Americans self-identify as conservatives.</p>

<p>Rush
finished off the segment by again accusing the administration of wanting health
care reform only to make people more dependent on government, and <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911100024">suggested</a> that some
Americans will be sent to "some re-education
camp if you don't lose weight." </p>

<p>Back from
another break, Rush decided to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fedition.cnn.hu%2F2009%2FSPORT%2F11%2F04%2Flittering.golf.balls%2Findex.html">share
a story</a> about the long decomposition time of golf balls, eventually getting
to a strange suggestion that the Loch Ness Monster died from eating golf balls.</p>

<p>Rush then
talked to a caller who claimed that no terrorist attacks occurred under seven
years of President Bush, and that Obama is
trying to cover up Fort
 Hood because he failed.
Rush claimed that the caller was "absolutely right", and
said that it's "no wonder it's not being
called a terrorist attack," because "there wasn't one during Bush's years."</p>

<p>After a
brief promotion of Zicam, Rush took another caller who mentioned Obama talking
about the expense of deploying troops to Afghanistan
with Tapper, with Rush claiming it's a poor excuse for Obama to dither on Afghanistan.</p>

<p>Rush came
back from a break wondering what happened to
the H1N1 emergency and <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msnbc.msn.com%2Fid%2F33797280%2Fns%2Fhealth-health_care%2F">read an MSNBC.com opinion piece</a> on the
administration's response to the disease. Rush
summed it up by saying, "All we need to know is
government is behind it". </p>

<p>Rush then
had a caller who asked if President Bush's "war effort to liberate Afghanistan and Iraq"
provided hope to children in the Middle East.
In his reply, Rush stated that "many children of the Middle
 East are having explosives strapped onto them by their parents."</p>

<p>Rush then
complained because children of World
Wildlife Fund employees are in a <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldwildlife.org%2Fclimate%2Finternational%2Fkidsvideo.html%3Fintcmp%3D224">video</a>
to call on Obama to go to Copenhagen for negotiations on plans to address climate change,
ranting about these children being
brainwashed "over a hoax". He interrupted the video to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworldnews%2Farticle-1226601%2FTeenager-shoots-polar-bear-dead-self-defence-stranded-iceberg.html">read
a story</a> about a 17-year-old who shot a polar
bear in self-defense. Coming back from
another break, Rush said that he's surprised there are enough children of WWF
staffers for the video, given how they feel about abortion and people causing
pollution.</p>

<p>Rush then
spent some time lamenting that he didn't get a caller's information to send him
a Sleep Number bed, and used this opportunity to advertise for them.</p>

<p>The final
caller into Rush's show brought up the issue of the constitutionality of
congressional health-care reform. Rush
responded that the Supreme Court can't address the constitutionality of it
until it's passed into law, but he would consult his "legal eagles" about it.
As <em>Media Matters</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200910300049">has noted</a>, legal
experts have debunked some claims in the conservative media about the
unconstitutionality of health care reform legislation.</p>

<p><em>Tom Allison, Zachary
 Aronow, and Kate Conway contributed to this edition of the
Limbaugh Wire.</em></p>
<h2><strong>Highlights
</strong></h2>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: You can stop sending me emails that Adita -- Anita
Hunn -- ahem -- Anita Dunn is leaving the Obama administration. We reported
that last week on this program when we also reported that her husband is
joining the administration. He's a lawyer in some capacity. I'm expecting Obama
will drop off Anita Dunn somewhere in Asia on
his next trip there so that she can fully immerse herself in her Maoism.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: That 10.2 percent rate is not accurate. It is
always calculated low. I have talked to many economists who claim that the --
to calculate the actual U.S.
unemployment rate, you multiply whatever the government says by one and a half.
During a recession, you multiply it by two. So 10 and a half unemployment
reported by government would equal 21 percent out in the real world. And there
are all kinds of factors of people that are not working, have given up trying
to work, and there are people who are still working who are being overworked by
people who refuse to hire anybody new but they're making them work longer
hours. There are also people in jobs that they hate but they can't leave
because there's nowhere else to go.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: In fact, there's a story today confirming --
confirming -- what I have said. A little editorial in <em>The Wall Street
Journal</em>. Some big, ranking Democrat went somewhere and let the cat out of
the bag of the purpose of health care: redistribution. The purpose of health
care is not to get people insured, not to get -- this is the Democrat
Incumbency Forever Act. It is to create so much transference of wealth, it is
to create so much dependence in the middle class on government that Democrats
will never lose power. That's the objective here. To make so many of you
dependent on your very existence for government subsidies, handouts, and checks
that you think only the Democrat Party will provide those for you, that
everybody knows the Republicans, if they ever get in power, are gonna cut that
back. So, this is the long-term goal. It's also a way for Obama to get even
with the achievers in this country, who he really is not happy -- let me find
that story. I've got it here.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: They don't care -- folks, this is so important to
get this health care bill, because this guy's right. Once it's there, it can't
be undone. It won't be rescinded. What government program ever is, may I ax
you. So, they're willing to even lose their majority to get this. They are
willing to lose their majority to get this. That's how big health care is. And
that is why the leaders, I'm talking about, the leaders and Obama on down are
happy to get this if it means -- even if it means losing their majority for
awhile. Because once they get this, I mean, they're going to -- they figure
they're going to get their majority back lickety-split. So the lesson here is,
you can be as opposed to this as you want -- and everybody is. There's not one
poll that shows support for this in a majority. The majority is opposed to it.
Doesn't matter. Doesn't matter. They are going to even sacrifice their
majorities to get this.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Now, I'm also hearing that Obama is going to personalize
this and pay tribute to each of the fallen personally, and if he does that,
that means he's stinging from the criticism of his speech with -- you know, to
the tribal leaders, where he gave a shout-out to this incident while praising
the tribal leaders at that scheduled conference. It was terrible, it was
horrible. It was as out of touch, disconnected from reality -- it was
insensitive. It was all the things that people thought Obama was not when they
elected him.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: So, the press here is getting more creative and
finding anything other than Islam's injunction to jihad to blame here. <em>The
New York Times</em> is claiming this is just one in a strong -- string of
violent incidents at Fort
 Hood. That's -- this is
what the left likes to call "blaming the victim." And it has a double virtue in
the <em>Times</em>' eyes of slandering soldiers as violent louts. And, boy, you
ought to see this <em>New York Times</em> story. It's all about how there are
divorces, there are wife beatings, there are incidents of violence that we
never hear about at Fort
 Hood. This guy was no
different than anybody else. Da da da da. They're going out of their way to
make sure that the U.S.
military is maligned for this. A respected, veneered institution of freedom and
liberty under assault because of political ideology and political correctness.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: From the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>: "Nidal Malik
Hasan's contacts with a radical Islamic cleric linked to some of the 9-11
hijackers were investigated but found to be mostly innocuous, officials say."
Really? What about all this talk post-9-11 that we had to start connecting the
dots that we didn't properly connect prior to 9-11? You know the headline here,
"Fort Hood
suspect was on U.S.
radar" -- really? "Radar"? Well, you know that's the screen with those little
dots on it, the little green dots that appear, and government's supposed to
connect those dots on the radar? And get this, Page 2 of this story: "DOJ,
Department of Justice guidelines did not warrant further investigation." What
are we doing to ourselves here? Nine-eleven never happened, or we're going to
reframe why it happened and who did it and for what reason? And somehow it's
our fault?</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: It's hard for people to accept this, but there are
people in this country who hate it. There are people in this country who
believe that the reason for all war, the reason for all angst, the reason for
all confrontation is us. And our size. And our power. That we have been
colonial, that we have been imperialistic, that we have conquered and stolen
all of the world's resources, and we have enriched ourselves and left the rest
of the world in abject poverty. And so we are a bad nation and we are evil and
that's why people hate us. And they work at the highest levels of government.
After 9-11, the State Department convened a seminar: What did we do to make
them mad? What is it about us they don't like? So, as difficult as it may be to
believe, there are people -- and Obama's one of them -- there are people in
this country who believe we are at fault and therefore, the mission has to be
to show these people that we mean them no harm, and that's -- and we'll even
apologize for our transgressions in the past as a means of showing you how
sincere we are. </p>

<p>We know the country prior to my becoming president, it was a
bad place. But now that I'm here, you can check our record for the last nine
months. We haven't attacked anybody, we haven't insulted anybody, we haven't
offended anybody. I'm running around the world apologizing for our country, for
my country, to show you that we don't mean you any harm. And we understand your
grievance against us, but we want to have a family of nations throughout this
world where there really aren't even any countries. I want to run it, he says,
but we don't even want any countries. We just want a unified world. Peaceful,
loving and so forth, and I get 10 percent of everything we generate from the
taxes of all citizens of the world.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Yet, they're going to great pains to say this is
not a war against Islam. Real Muslims are strongly opposed to violence. I tell
you, these people running this country must have so much guilt and so much animosity
toward this country -- the only thing that can explain this. Well, stupidity, I
guess you'd throw in there, too.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: See, what you have to understand -- in Obama's
mind, we, the United States,
are to blame for the poverty of the world, because we've stolen all the rich
resources. The ignorance of people in the world, the helplessness because of
our superpower status, and therefore their despair -- it's all our fault. "We
will have to make sure, despite our rage, that any U.S. military action takes into
account the lives of innocent civilians abroad. We will have to be unwavering
in opposing bigotry or discrimination directed against neighbors and friends of
Middle Eastern descent. Finally, we will have to devote far more attention to
the monumental task of raising the hopes and prospects of embittered children
across the globe, children not just in the Middle East but also in Africa,
Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe, and within our own shores." Raising the
hopes and the prospects.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>Well, how's the hope and change in this country that he's
behind working out for ya? The terrorists -- the terrorists are getting a pass,
Snerdly. Snerdly asked me, "What are the terrorists supposed to do?" They're
getting a pass. That's the whole point of this. The terrorists get a pass.
We've got to understand them. It's our fault. There's poverty, there's
destitution, desolution, there's despair and helplessness, and we've got to
understand why. And to understand why, we've got to understand why they hate
us. We've got to figure out what it is that wants to make them do this to us.
And, of course, the central answer to that question is, "We're doing it. We're
behind it." That explains all of this. There are some sick people running the
show in this country.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Suddenly, Obama is worried about money? He's
worried about 50 measly billion dollars to win a war after $750 billion in TARP
money? After a $1 trillion stimulus bill that's bombing out? On top of 1.2 to
$2 trillion for his health care plan? And he says it's expensive to send more
troops over there? It's a billion dollars for every thousand troops, and that's
expensive? All of a sudden, this guy's worried about the expense of something?</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>CALLER: I think that the main point behind the Fort Hood
terrorist attack is political correctness, but I also think that Obama, the
White House, and the media are not going to let the facts come out that it was,
in fact, a terrorist attack, because if it was a terrorist attack, that means
Obama failed. Bush gave us seven years with no terrorist attacks, and a little
over a year after Obama's been in office, there' s a terrorist attack while
he's trying to soften our defense and our intelligence? That means Obama
failed. Once again, the all-knowing, all-seeing Maja-Rushie is right. Obama
failed. </p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Need to ask you one question.</p>

<p>CALLER: Yeah.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Because I'm not -- we want to be accurate on this.
Did the Fort Dix attack occur during the Bush
administration? Or have all these attacks occurred since Obama took office? I
think Fort Dix was not this year. Now, Arkansas was this year.
The Arkansas recruit-- Fort Dix
was stopped? Oh yeah, Fort
 Dix was stopped. Yeah,
and that was during the Bush admini-- yeah, 2007. And that's right, the Bush
administration stopped it.</p>

<p>CALLER: Yeah.</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: That's right, that's right. So you are absolutely
right. I was just trying to be extra cautionary -- or cautious. You're
absolutely right. That's -- no wonder it's not going to be called a terrorist
attack. There wasn't one during Bush's years, and, of course, there haven't
been any since Obama swept in there and took office.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2><strong>Outrageous
comments</strong></h2>
<blockquote>

<p>CALLER: You cited a 2001 quote from the Messiah, and my
teleprompter has a question. The Messiah said that a key lesson learned from
9-11 is that it's incumbent upon us, the U.S.,
to provide hope for the children of the Middle East.
So what's your opinion as to whether President Bush's war effort to liberate Afghanistan and Iraq from their oppressive,
hate-generating regimes -- doesn't that provide that kind of hope?</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: I always thought it did, and I think ultimately
the people of Afghanistan
and Iraq
thought so. They eventually joined with us. Remember now, remember -- here's --
this is -- you know, nobody dare say what I'm going to say. But Obama talking
about "incumbent upon the U.S.
to provide hope for the children of the Middle East" -- many children of the Middle East are having explosives strapped on them by
their parents and sent onto buses. It is not the United States that is killing them
or destroying their hope. It is their own culture. But we dare not say that. So
don't tell anybody out there, Frank, that I said that.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH: That's children of the World Wildlife Fund
staffers in a video on the World Wildlife Fund website. I mean, this is --
these people using their own kids, brainwashing their own kids for the
advancement of a hoax. Using and brainwashing their own kids. About a lie. All
for the purpose of advancing a policy that's going to result in restricted
freedom for these kids. No chance at prosperity because of high energy taxes.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911100043</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:22:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh Calls  Rep. Cao "Cash Cao"</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911090036</link>
<description><![CDATA[<h2>Rush labeled health care reform vote the "Saturday night massacre"</h2>

<p>By Tom Allison</p>

<p>Rush kicked
off the show predicting that "political correctness will be our downfall," not
believing how often over the weekend he heard people ask why alleged Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan would
murder soldiers at Fort Hood. A theme for the show, Rush repeatedly compared
Hasan to the 9-11 hijackers, commenting that
they worshipped at the same mosque, visited strip clubs and bars before their
attacks, and espoused similar views. </p>

<p>Despite the
fact that a Republican-controlled Congress <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fclerk.house.gov%2Fevs%2F2003%2Froll332.xml">passed</a> the prescription
drug expansion of Medicare late on a weekend, Rush accused House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
of pulling a fast one by holding the health care
reform vote on a Saturday night when "no one
was paying attention"; he called it the "Saturday night massacre." </p>

<p>Rush wasn't
placated by the Stupak Amendment that would <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911060042">effectively</a> ban abortion
coverage for some who have it now, incredulous that conservatives would be
expected to support the bill. Rush declared that the legislation is not only
anti-fetus (as the Stupak Amendment won't be in
the final bill) but also "the most profoundly anti-life,
at-all-ages, piece of legislation that has ever passed the U.S.
House of Representatives."</p>

<p>Echoing the
Drudge Report and <em>The Washington Times</em>, Limbaugh <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911090017">falsely claimed</a> that
Rep. Bill Owens (D-NY), in his first day in office, broke four campaign
promises at once by voting for the House health care bill, misrepresenting both
Owens' campaign positions and provisions of the House health care bill.</p>

<p>Wrapping up
a busy first segment, Rush echoed a lot of conservative blogs today and
complained about Obama's absence from the 20-year
anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall.</p>
<h2>Rush on Fort Hood:
"[W]e could almost say that this is Obama's fault"</h2>

<p>Limbaugh
used the "if it acts like a duck and sounds like a duck" analogy to argue that
Hasan was a full-blown Islamic terrorist.
Limbaugh read from a UK <em>Daily Telegraph </em><a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworldnews%2Fnorthamerica%2Fusa%2F6526030%2FFort-Hood-gunman-had-told-US-military-colleagues-that-infidels-should-have-their-throats-cut.html">article</a>
that Hasan "had told US military colleagues that infidels should have their
throats cut." </p>

<p>Rush also
asked when President Obama would get blamed for
the Fort Hood massacre, because of reports that Hasan thought Obama would withdraw all troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, and lashed out after Obama
didn't. Limbaugh also mockingly hoped that FBI interrogators weren't
waterboarding Hasan.</p>

<p>Rush also
accused the media of politicizing the massacre:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Now the drive-by folks are bending over backwards
searching for the rationale, any rationale for the murders at Fort Hood, but, actually,
they're not looking for a rationale; they're
using the tragedy to justify their own personal claptrap: "Is America to blame?" They love this. This just gives
them another bit of ammo to shoot at this country:
"Is America to blame?" "Is the war to
blame?" "Is
Bush to blame?" "Is
Cheney to blame for this?"</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Rush then
played an excerpt from Sen. Lindsey Graham's (R-SC) appearance on CBS' <em>Face the Nation</em> -- where Graham and host Bob Schieffer agreed that
Muslims don't have a "corner" on extremist violence --
in order to criticize the media for not acknowledging the significance of evidence
of Hasan's extremist views.</p>

<p>Rush argued
that Hasan was promoted to major because of political correctness, then doubled back, claiming that "approved minorities,
approved victims are not held to the same standards"</p>

<p>Rush called
Obama's reaction to the Fort
 Hood attack "striking"
and called it "Obama's My Pet Goat moment." Rush also didn't seem happy that
Hasan's interrogators would honor his right
of an attorney. </p>
<h2>Rush:
"[T]his whole bill is
about death"</h2>

<p>Kicking off
the second hour, Rush repeated his claim from his appearance on <em>Fox News
Sunday</em> that he feels like he's in a war fighting liberals who are trying to
curb liberty and freedom. </p>

<p>Rush
couldn't believe that House Democrats were cheering passage of health care reform on Saturday night, arguing that
Democrats "just voted themselves out of office." Rush then transitioned into
another rant about the purported "freedom-killing" and "life-threatening" House health care
bill:</p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: The thing that really frosts me about this is that
this whole bill is about death. This whole bill is about rationing who gets
coverage and who doesn't and under what circumstances. It is the single
greatest tool a government will have to regulate every aspect of behavior. This
is a freedom-killing -- and it is going to end
up being a life-threatening bill. </p>

<p>Human beings will die earlier than normal, than necessary,
because of this bill. There will be bureaucratic institutions, bureaucracies, which will make decisions on who gets treated and
what kind of treatment they get and who doesn't get treated. But because they
thought the bill had been improved -- to say
that no money would be used to fund abortions --
that it was OK to support the bill.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Rush
on Rep. Joseph Cao: "Cash
Cao is his new nickname"</h2>

<p>Back from
the break, Limbaugh called the Stupak Amendment a "trick" to get pro-life congressional members to vote for the bill. Limbaugh
of course smeared the sole Republican to vote yes, Rep. Joseph Cao from Louisiana. Rush claimed
that "Cash Cao" was bought off with promises
of Medicaid funding by Obama.</p>

<p>Later on, a caller said
Limbaugh was "walking on thin ice" for calling Hasan a terrorist, warning that Obama would send his Marxist
propaganda machine after him. In response, Rush again argued that Hasan is an
"Islamic terrorist" and then read the majority of Fox News contributor Ret.
Col. Ralph Peters' <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nypost.com%2Fp%2Fnews%2Fopinion%2Fopedcolumnists%2Ffort_hood_xjP9yGrJN7gl7zdsJ31vnJ"><em>New York Post</em> op-ed</a>. Limbaugh promised to link to
the op-ed on his website. </p>

<p>Echoing
other conservative media, Rush played Sen. Joe Lieberman's
promise to filibuster health care reform that
includes a public option for the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911090006">dubious reason</a> that it
will have a negative impact on the deficit. </p>

<p>Back from
the break, Rush read from serial health care
reform misinformer Betsy McCaughey's November 7 <em>Wall Street Journal</em>
op-ed, which <em>Media Matters</em> has <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911070006">thoroughly debunked</a>.
Rush also read from this BigGovernment.com <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fbiggovernment.com%2F2009%2F11%2F06%2Fcommittee-confirms-comply-with-pelosi-care-or-go-to-jail%2F">blog
post</a> that shockingly confirmed that failure to adhere to the law might
result in jail time. </p>

<p>Later, Rush was all too happy to promote former GE CEO
Jack Welch's <em>Boston Herald</em> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonherald.com%2Fbusiness%2Fgeneral%2Fview.bg%3Farticleid%3D1209839">op-ed</a>, which criticized Obama's economic policies. Limbaugh
complained about the unemployment rate and read from this Associated Press <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ffinance.yahoo.com%2Fnews%2FJobless-10-percent-is-tougher-apf-544090931.html%3Fx%3D0%26.v%3D3">article</a>
arguing that this recession is tougher than
previous ones. </p>

<p>Rush also
agreed with a Jay Nordlinger <a href="http://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fcorner.nationalreview.com%2Fpost%2F%3Fq%3DY2JlYzMwZWUxYjIwODAzOGY0ZjRjMjI1NGZjZGJhODg%3D">blog
post</a>, incredulous that people would call for gun control in the wake of
Fort Hood. </p>

<p>Limbaugh
wrapped up today's show with a striking prediction of dire consequences for the
nation if the GOP doesn't win big in 2010. </p>

<p><em>Zachary Aronow, Kate Conway, and Zachary Pleat contributed to this edition of the Limbaugh
Wire.</em></p>
<h2>Highlights </h2>

<p><strong>Outrageous comments</strong></p>
<blockquote>

<p>LIMBAUGH: Last Saturday, House Democrats had the unmitigated gall to show up
on a Saturday night when nobody was paying attention,
after the unemployment number at 10.2 percent
and commit a Saturday night massacre on this country. That's
nothing other than a Saturday night massacre. </p>

<p>After
securing the vote to destroy the best health care delivery system in the world
and replace it with a massive, big government, trillion-plus dollar, job-killing monstrosity -- and
I gotta tell you something here, folks, on this. That Stupak
amendment -- I don't want to ever hear -- I don't want to
ever hear anybody tell me again that Nancy Pelosi's stupid. She pulled a giant
trick on pro-life Republicans and Democrats. Single-issue politics came roaring to the top here. </p>

<p>And when
she put in the Stupak Amendment that convinced pro-lifers, hey, hey, abortion's
not going to be funded; we gotta vote for it -- it was silly. I guess now we should all get behind
this bill because of this -- that's -- well,
that's what they're telling us. I mean, for
crying out loud. I mean, this is -- one of my
concerns, ladies and gentlemen, always was, you put abortion in it and forces will rally, then you pretend to take it
out, and those people suddenly think they have to be for a bill -- that this is where this abortion stuff -- I just scratch my
head. </p>

<p>OK, so we've been fooled, and the House has been
fooled into thinking that abortions are not going to be federally funded under
health care but for crying out loud when you look at the rest of the bill, it's about nothing but death. It's about the death
of the living. This is the most profoundly
anti-life, at-all-ages, piece of
legislation that has ever passed the U.S. House of Representatives. </p>

<p>I mean, it's anti-life,
depending on your age, depending on the severity of your illness, depending on
your party affiliation probably, depending on a whole lot of things. It is
anti-freedom, and,
without that, you're not going to have a
pro-life movement at all.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
I'm sure they're not going to call this a hate crime. I'm sure this man's inner
feelings are going to be probed regarding the Bush/Cheney war. You wait. But let's not forget this man had no problem with
killing people, zilch, 'cause he wasn't -- this guy's not a
pacifist. This guy is not a conscientious objector. He didn't like Americans in
Afghanistan or Iraq. </p>

<p>And by the way, I mean, playing the
game the way the media and the Democrats do, we
could almost say that this is Obama's fault, because this guy said that he believed Obama was
going to get us out of Iraq
and Afghanistan.
Obama hasn't done it and that's one of the reasons why the guy cracked.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
Now the drive-by folks are bending over backwards searching for the rationale,
any rationale for the murders at Fort Hood, but, actually, they're not looking for a rationale; they're using the tragedy to justify their own
personal claptrap: "Is
America to blame?" They love this. This just gives them another bit of ammo to shoot at this
country: "Is America to blame?" "Is the war to
blame?" "Is
Bush to blame?" "Is
Cheney to blame for this?"</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
The thing that really frosts me about this is that this whole bill is about
death. This whole bill is about rationing who gets coverage and who doesn't and
under what circumstances. It is the single greatest tool a government will have
to regulate every aspect of behavior. This is a freedom-killing -- and it is going to end up being a life-threatening
bill. </p>

<p>Human
beings will die earlier than normal, than necessary, because of this bill.
There will be bureaucratic institutions, bureaucracies,
which will make decisions on who gets treated and what kind of treatment they
get and who doesn't get treated. But because they thought the bill had been
improved -- to say that no money would be used
to fund abortions -- that it was OK to support the bill.</p>

<p>[...]</p>

<p>LIMBAUGH:
If we cede 2010, you can kiss the country goodbye as you know it. You can kiss
it goodbye. There won't be an uprising. And if
there is an uprising, even if Obama's defeated in 2012,
I mean, it's -- look it, I remember
during the Reagan years, one of the big things conservatives said they were
gonna do is dismantle the Department of Education. Has that happened? </p>

<p>And
people say, "Well we'll
get up there and we'll reverse all this." It
doesn't happen much, folks. Entitlements, new bills don't just get canceled.
They don't just get reversed or rescinded. You've got to stop them before they
happen. And if we cede the 2010 election, it's disastrous. No way.</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<author />
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/limbaughwire/200911090036</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:16:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
